Startup Diligence
Diligence report Enterprise Tech / Developer Tools / Open Source Databases Private unicorn / late-stage venture-backed

Supabase

Supabase Startup Diligence Research Report

The diligence thesis is a high-growth, developer-led Postgres platform with substantial open-source/community distribution and expanding enterprise packaging; the investment case depends on whether community adoption converts into durable paid ARR with healthy infrastructure margins and manageable reliability/privacy obligations.

Company profile

Supabase Startup Diligence Research Report

Supabase is eligible for a private-unicorn diligence report: public evidence verifies active/private status and a company-announced $100M Series E at a $5B pre-money valuation. Product, developer-community and open-source traction are strong, while audited financials, cap table, revenue quality, customer concentration, legal schedules and enterprise contract economics remain the core diligence gaps.

Website
supabase.com
Sector
Enterprise Tech / Developer Tools / Open Source Databases
Geography
United States / San Francisco Bay Area; globally distributed
Stage
Private unicorn / late-stage venture-backed
Known aliases
Supabase, Inc., supabase/supabase
Report version
1.0
Timezone
UTC

Executive summary

Strengths

  • Latest public valuation around $5B is verified by Supabase Series E announcement and independent news snippet.
  • Private-company eligibility is supported by YC Active and LinkedIn Privately Held evidence.
  • Product positioning as a Postgres developer platform is supported by YC, LinkedIn and Supabase materials.

Risks

  • Financial quality and valuation step-up cannot be underwritten without private ARR/burn/cap-table evidence.
  • Customer concentration and logo-to-revenue quality are not public.
  • Shared-responsibility and customer misconfiguration risk can create product, support and reputational exposure.

Gaps

  • Audited financial statements, ARR bridge, gross margin, burn, runway and debt instruments.
  • Fully diluted cap table, option pool, secondary sale terms and investor rights.
  • Top-customer revenue, contracts, renewal/churn cohorts and independent references.
  • Security reports, incident history, SOC/ISO evidence, subprocessors and litigation/regulatory schedules.

Recommended next steps

  • Open financial/cap-table data room and reconcile $5B valuation to ARR, NRR, burn and gross margin.
  • Run technical architecture and reliability review focused on Postgres scale, RLS defaults, incidents and cloud dependencies.
  • Conduct counsel-led litigation/IP/privacy diligence including USPTO/TSDR, dockets, DPA/subprocessor review and insurance.
  • Perform customer diligence with top accounts, churned accounts and enterprise pipeline conversion cohorts.

Risk register

high medium likelihood

R-001: Valuation step-up and financial quality opacity

Latest public $5B pre-money valuation follows a reported $2B Series D within months, while audited financials, ARR, burn and debt are not public.

Diligence request: Request audited financial statements, board packages, ARR bridge, burn, runway, debt, option pool and round documents.

high medium likelihood

R-003: Technical roadmap complexity around Postgres storage and scale

Oriole/pluggable-storage and decoupled compute/storage ambitions are strategically valuable but carry integration and reliability risk.

Diligence request: Request R&D roadmap, incident history, architecture review, migration plans and performance benchmarks.

high medium likelihood

R-009: Shared-responsibility misconfiguration risk

Customers retain responsibility for data, RLS, secrets, access management and production readiness; customer mistakes can become reputational or support incidents.

Diligence request: Review security-advisor adoption, default configurations, education, support tickets and incident root causes.

high unknown likelihood

R-006: Customer concentration and reference quality are unknown

Customer logos and case studies are public, but revenue concentration, contract terms, churn and implementation satisfaction are not.

Diligence request: Request top-25 customer revenue schedule, contracts, renewals, churn cohorts and independent reference calls.

medium medium likelihood

R-002: Usage-based pricing and gross-margin sensitivity

Pricing exposes Supabase to infrastructure cost, support and egress variability; realized margins are not public.

Diligence request: Request gross margin by product/tier, cloud COGS, egress exposure and pricing cohorts.

medium medium likelihood

R-004: Open-source governance and issue backlog

Large public repo traction and open issues imply community scale and support burden.

Diligence request: Review maintainer coverage, security response SLAs, contributor license controls and backlog aging.

medium medium likelihood

R-005: Developer-community claims may not convert into paid revenue

Stars, community members and developer counts are strong top-of-funnel signals but not proof of paid conversion or retention.

Diligence request: Request funnel metrics: free-to-paid conversion, activation, NRR, churn, CAC and cohort retention.

medium medium likelihood

R-007: Rapid distributed hiring and people-process scaling

Public headcount signals range from 280+ team members to 357 visible LinkedIn employees across many countries.

Diligence request: Request HRIS export, attrition, regretted loss, offer acceptance, compensation bands and country-by-country employer-of-record setup.

Chapter 01

01Financial Information

Funding and valuation are strongly evidenced; operating financials and capital structure remain private.

I.A Annual and quarterly financial information for the past three years

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Public sources verify funding and pricing signals but not audited financials, management accounts, backlog or AR aging.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist I.A.1, I.A.2, I.A.3, I.A.4, I.A.5, I.A.6 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Valuation step-up and financial quality opacity
  • Usage-based pricing and gross-margin sensitivity

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Annual and quarterly financial information for the past three years.
Public revenue, ARR and unit-economic signals
metricpublic signalverification statusprivate request
ARR / revenueNot disclosed in public sources reviewednot_publicly_verifiableAudited financials, ARR by month and revenue recognition memo
PricingFree, Pro $25+, Team $599+, Enterprise customverifiedActual ACV, discounting and overage revenue by cohort
Gross margin / COGSCompute and egress pricing exposed publicly; realized COGS not disclosednot_publicly_verifiableCloud spend, support cost, gross margin by product and customer
Backlog / AR agingNo public disclosurenot_publicly_verifiableBacklog, deferred revenue and AR aging schedules

I.B Financial Projections

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Pricing mechanics and growth signals are visible; projections, business predictability and external financing assumptions are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist I.B.1, I.B.2, I.B.3, I.B.4, I.B.5, I.B.6, I.B.7, I.B.8 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Usage-based pricing and gross-margin sensitivity

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Financial Projections.

I.C Capital Structure

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Public eligibility suggests a privately held company; shareholder, option, warrant, debt and off-balance-sheet schedules are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist I.C.1, I.C.2, I.C.3, I.C.4, I.C.5 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Valuation step-up and financial quality opacity

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Capital Structure.
Public capital structure and ownership snapshot
stakeholderpublic positionevidencediligence caveat
Accel / Peak XVSeries E lead investorsCompany Series E blogShare class, liquidation preference, board rights and ownership percent private
FigmaJoined Series ECompany Series E blogStrategic rights or commercial agreements unknown
EmployeesEligible for recurring secondary sale of 25% of vested stock per round per company blogCompany Series E blogPlan documents, option pool and tender terms private
Public market investorsNone observedLinkedIn Privately Held; YC ActiveConfirm no confidential IPO/acquisition process

I.D Other financial information

verified confidence: medium

Funding history is the strongest public financial evidence: $200M Series D snippet at $2B and company-announced $100M Series E at $5B pre-money.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist I.D.1, I.D.2, I.D.3 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Valuation step-up and financial quality opacity

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Other financial information.
Public funding-round history
dateroundamountvaluationlead or participantsverification
2025-04-22Series D$200M$2BNot fetched; Fortune/Yahoo snippet onlypartially_verified
2025-10-03Series E$100M$5B pre-moneyAccel and Peak XV led; Figma joined; YC, Coatue, Felicis, Craft, Square Peg existing investorsverified
pre-2025Prior roundsNot itemized publicly in this screennot_publicly_verifiableYC and other existing investors referencednot_publicly_verifiable
Supabase funding timeline Publicly observed funding and eligibility events.
Public valuation trajectory chart Shows priced public valuation anchors and undisclosed earlier periods.
Chapter 02

02Products

Product scope and pricing are public; margins, roadmap economics and production performance need company data.

II.A Description of each product

verified confidence: medium

Supabase is publicly positioned as a Postgres development platform with database, auth, APIs, realtime, storage and edge functions; production-readiness guidance shows mature controls and customer responsibilities.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist II.A.1, II.A.2, II.A.3, II.A.4, II.A.5, II.A.6 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Usage-based pricing and gross-margin sensitivity
  • Technical roadmap complexity around Postgres storage and scale
  • Shared-responsibility misconfiguration risk

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Description of each product.
Product and SKU matrix
product or moduleaudiencepublic featuresevidence status
Postgres database platformDevelopers / teamsDedicated/isolated Postgres clusters and database setupverified
Authentication and user managementApp developersAuthentication, RLS guidance, MFA/production controlsverified
Realtime, APIs, Storage, Edge FunctionsWeb/mobile/AI appsRealtime subscriptions/streams, instant APIs, storage and edge functionsverified
Enterprise platform featuresEnterprise teamsSSO, SLAs, 24x7x365 support, compliance and custom security questionnairesverified
Pricing and packaging comparison across tiers
tiermonthly priceincluded or highlighted featuresdiligence note
Free$050k MAU, 500MB database, 5GB egress, community supportPLG acquisition; cost of free users must be measured
ProFrom $25100k MAU, 8GB disk, 250GB egress, email support, 7-day backups/logsUsage overages can drive ARPU and bill shock risk
TeamFrom $599SOC2/ISO, SSO, priority support, 14-day backups, 28-day logs, HIPAA add-onCompliance monetization signal; attach rate not public
EnterpriseCustomDesignated support, uptime SLAs, BYO cloud, 24x7x365 support, private SlackEnterprise contract terms and SLA credit exposure private
Product maturity and production-readiness controls
control areapublic guidancerisk if weakverification
Data accessEnable RLS and policiesCustomer data exposure through misconfigurationverified
Network/securitySSL enforcement, network restrictions, MFAUnauthorized access or weak account controlsverified
PerformanceIndexes, load testing, resourcesProduction outage or degraded application performanceverified
Shared responsibilityCustomer responsible for data/schema/access/security controlsSupport/reputation risk despite customer faultverified
Product and responsibility architecture Logical product architecture from public positioning and documentation.
Chapter 03

03Customer Information

Customer logos and cases are public; concentration, contracts, churn and supplier economics are not.

III.A Top customers by application

partially verified confidence: medium

Company-owned customer stories identify a broad set of logos and use cases, but top-15 customer revenue is not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist III.A where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Customer concentration and reference quality are unknown

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Top customers by application.
Publicly known customers and case studies
customeruse case or outcomesource qualityrevenue verified
UdioAI music platform scaling/support collaborationSupabase/customer-story snippetNo
eXp Realty2,000+ non-technical employees build production software; replacing millions in SaaS contracts per snippetSupabase/customer-story snippetNo
Kayhan SpaceSatcat space-operator tooling; 8x developer-speed improvement per snippetSupabase/customer-story snippetNo
Phoenix EnergyFull-stack migration from MongoDB ahead of deadline with zero downtime per snippetSupabase/customer-story snippetNo
Other listed logosChatbase, Brevo, GovSignals, Rally, Deriv, Resend and others on customer indexCompany marketing indexNo
Customer evidence bar chart Compares public customer evidence strength by category.

III.B Strategic relationships

partially verified confidence: medium

Public case studies and investor/customer ecosystem evidence indicate strategic relationships; contractual economics remain private.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist III.B where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Customer concentration and reference quality are unknown

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Strategic relationships.
Strategic relationships and partnerships
relationshipnaturepublic evidencegap
FigmaSeries E strategic/financial investorFigma joined Series ECommercial terms or product integration not disclosed
Open-source communitiesPostgres, PostgREST, pgvector, Deno, Phoenix/imgproxy ecosystem alignment100k stars blog credits communities/toolsSponsorship/maintainer contracts not fully public
YC / Accel / Peak XV / existing investorsCapital and networkSeries E blog and YC profileGovernance rights and investor support not public

III.C Revenue by customer

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No public customer revenue concentration, ARR contribution or 5% customer disclosure was found.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist III.C where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Customer concentration and reference quality are unknown

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Revenue by customer.

III.D Significant relationships severed within the last two years

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No public evidence of severed major customer or supplier relationships was found; requires management certification.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist III.D where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Customer concentration and reference quality are unknown

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Significant relationships severed within the last two years.

III.E Top suppliers

verified confidence: medium

AWS-region documentation indicates a material cloud infrastructure dependency; supplier spend and contract terms are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist III.E where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Cloud-region and infrastructure dependency

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Top suppliers.
Top supplier / infrastructure dependency snapshot
supplier or dependencyrolepublic evidenceconcentration risk
AWS regionsProject deployment regionsDocs list AWS regions and one primary region per projectHigh if cloud terms/outages/data residency not managed
OAuth/SAML/SMTP/SMS/external APIsCustomer integrationsShared responsibility docs reference these third-party servicesCustomer integration outages can affect projects
Open-source componentsPlatform foundationPostgres, PostgREST, pgvector, Deno and Phoenix cited by company blogLicense/security/maintainer risk; open-source governance required
Chapter 04

04Competition

Competitive position is credible but crowded; win/loss and market share are not public.

IV.A Competitive landscape by market segment

verified confidence: medium

Supabase competes in developer backend/database platforms against cloud, open-source and Firebase-like alternatives; positioning rests on Postgres/open-source/developer experience.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist IV.A.1, IV.A.2 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Developer-community claims may not convert into paid revenue

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Competitive landscape by market segment.
Competitor comparison matrix
competitorsegmentproduct overlapsupabase differentiatorevidence basis
Firebase / Google CloudBackend-as-a-serviceAuth, database, functions, storageOpen-source and Postgres-first positioningSupabase product/GitHub/pricing evidence; competitor details analyst judgment
NeonServerless PostgresManaged Postgres developer databaseBroader app-backend suite and communityAnalyst market comparison
PlanetScale / cloud databasesDeveloper databasesManaged database workflowsPostgres app platform vs database-onlyAnalyst market comparison
AWS/GCP/Azure native servicesHyperscale cloudDatabases, auth, storage, functionsIntegrated developer experience and open-source communitySupabase docs/pricing plus analyst judgment
Basis-of-competition scoring
axissupabase positionrisk or gapevidence
Developer experienceStrong public signal from GitHub/community and product-led packagingNeeds paid conversion evidence102k+ stars; free tier; docs/blog
Enterprise readinessImproving with Team/Enterprise, SOC2/ISO mention and support tiersEnterprise NRR/SLA outcomes privatePricing page
Technical defensibilityOpen-source Postgres alignment plus Oriole R&DOpen source also lowers switching barriersOriole and product principles
Scale/reliabilityProduction checklist and status page support maturityIncident history not publicDocs/status snippet
Competitive market map Positions Supabase among backend/database alternatives.
Chapter 05

05Marketing, Sales, and Distribution

GTM appears product-led and community-driven; CAC, conversion and sales productivity are not public.

V.A Strategy and implementation

verified confidence: medium

Marketing signal is developer-led: free tier, open-source repo, docs, customer stories, community and launch/blog content.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist V.A.1, V.A.2, V.A.3, V.A.4 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Developer-community claims may not convert into paid revenue

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Strategy and implementation.
Public marketing-signal summary
signalobserved valuesourcediligence interpretation
GitHub stars102,786 via API; 100,000 milestone blogGitHub API / company blogStrong developer awareness; not revenue proof
Developers building8 million company-reported100k stars blogLarge top-of-funnel claim; require methodology
Community members540,000+Careers pageCommunity-led distribution; require active-member definition
Customer storiesMultiple named case studiesCustomer indexLogo/story evidence; validate references independently
GTM signal bar chart Quantifies available public top-of-funnel/community anchors.

V.B Major Customers

verified confidence: medium

Major-customer trends are visible only through selected customer stories; pipeline and expansion metrics are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist V.B.1, V.B.2, V.B.3 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Customer concentration and reference quality are unknown

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Major Customers.

V.C Principal avenues for generating new business

verified confidence: medium

Principal new-business avenues appear to be PLG/free tier, GitHub/community, docs/blog/customer stories and enterprise sales.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist V.C where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Developer-community claims may not convert into paid revenue

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Principal avenues for generating new business.
Distribution channels and GTM motions
channelpublic evidencelikely rolemissing metric
Free tier / PLGFree plan with MAU/database limitsAcquisition and activationFree-to-paid conversion
Open-source GitHub102,786 stars and Apache-2.0 repoDeveloper trust and adoptionGitHub-to-signup conversion
Community/content540k+ community and 100k-star blog; docs/blogEducation and retentionContent attribution/CAC
Enterprise salesEnterprise custom plan, designated support, SLAs, private SlackLarge ACV expansionQuota, sales cycle, pipeline coverage

V.D Sales force productivity model

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Sales compensation, quotas, cycle length and salesforce productivity are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist V.D.1, V.D.2, V.D.3, V.D.4 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Developer-community claims may not convert into paid revenue

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Sales force productivity model.

V.E Ability to implement marketing plan with current and projected budgets

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Marketing budget sufficiency cannot be assessed publicly beyond fundraising and hiring signals.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist V.E where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Developer-community claims may not convert into paid revenue

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Ability to implement marketing plan with current and projected budgets.
Chapter 06

06Research and Development

R&D and open-source activity are strong; roadmap delivery risk needs engineering diligence.

VI.A Description of R&D organization

verified confidence: medium

Open-source repositories, verified GitHub organization, public contributors and careers claims show a large technical organization and community.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VI.A.1, VI.A.2, VI.A.3 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Open-source governance and issue backlog

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Description of R&D organization.
Key R&D personnel and organization signals
areapublic signalevidence statusdiligence need
FoundersPaul Copplestone and Ant Wilson listed as active founders by YCverifiedFull executive bios and technical leadership roles
Open-source orgVerified GitHub org with 151 public repos and 10,127 followersverifiedMaintainer assignments and security-response process
ContributorsCareers page claims 1,500+ contributorsverifiedContributor license and governance controls
Distributed team280+ team members in 55+ countriesverifiedFunction-level R&D headcount and hiring plan
R&D organization map Public R&D/community organization map without private reporting lines.

VI.B New Product Pipeline

verified confidence: medium

Public R&D agenda includes Oriole/Postgres storage work, scale and open-source initiatives; budget/timing milestones are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VI.B.1, VI.B.2, VI.B.3, VI.B.4 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Technical roadmap complexity around Postgres storage and scale

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to New Product Pipeline.
Public product / research pipeline
initiativestatuspublic goalrisk
OrioleDB / pluggable storageTeam joined Supabase in 2024Faster storage, pluggable storage, decoupled storage/computeDeep database engineering integration risk
MultigresMentioned in Series E hiring/open-source initiativesScale Postgres to petabytes / Vitess-for-Postgres ambitionSource page not fully fetched; milestones private
Platform production controlsPublic docs availableRLS, SSL, network restrictions, MFA, load testingCustomer misconfiguration risk
Core open-source platformActive public repo pushed 2026-05-21Postgres development platformHigh open issue/support burden
Chapter 07

07Management and Personnel

Founder, remote and headcount signals are public; full HR, compensation and turnover data are private.

VII.A Organization Chart

verified confidence: medium

The company is distributed/remote with public founder evidence; complete org chart reporting lines are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VII.A where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Remote global operating compliance

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Organization Chart.
Senior management roster snapshot
name or rolepublic rolesourcecaveat
Paul CopplestoneActive founderYC profileFull biography, equity and employment terms private
Ant WilsonActive founderYC profileFull biography, equity and employment terms private
Oriole team / technical leadersJoined Supabase for storage-engine R&DCompany blogNamed reporting lines and retention terms not public
Board / executives beyond foundersNot fully disclosed in reviewed public sourcesPublic gapRequest board deck, org chart and executive bios

VII.B Historical and projected headcount by function and location

verified confidence: medium

Public headcount anchors include 280+ team members, 55+ countries and 357 LinkedIn employees; function/location breakout is private.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VII.B where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Rapid distributed hiring and people-process scaling

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Historical and projected headcount by function and location.
Headcount and hiring signals
sourceheadcount or signalgeographyinterpretation
Careers page280+ team members55+ countriesCompany hiring page anchor; likely current marketing metric
LinkedIn201-500 company size; 357 discoverable employeesGlobal / US primaryProfile-based employee count can include alumni/lag
Series E blog100% distributed, 37 countries, over 30 ex-founders37 countriesTalent positioning and seniority signal
Private requestFunction, location and hiring-plan data unavailablenot_publicly_verifiableNeed HRIS and budget
Public headcount trend anchors Compares public employee-count anchors observed during research.

VII.C Senior management biographies

partially verified confidence: medium

YC verifies founders Paul Copplestone and Ant Wilson; complete senior-management biographies and tenure should be collected.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VII.C where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Rapid distributed hiring and people-process scaling

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Senior management biographies.

VII.D Compensation arrangements

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Employment agreements, benefits cost and executive compensation are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VII.D.1, VII.D.2 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Rapid distributed hiring and people-process scaling

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Compensation arrangements.

VII.E Incentive stock plans

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Employee secondary statement indicates equity liquidity practices, but stock-plan terms and dilution are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VII.E where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Valuation step-up and financial quality opacity
  • Rapid distributed hiring and people-process scaling

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Incentive stock plans.

VII.F Significant employee relations problems, past or present

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No public employee-relations problems were identified in this standard screen.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VII.F where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Rapid distributed hiring and people-process scaling

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Significant employee relations problems, past or present.

VII.G Personnel Turnover

verified confidence: medium

Public turnover rates are not available; rapid distributed growth warrants retention diligence.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VII.G.1, VII.G.2 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Rapid distributed hiring and people-process scaling

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Personnel Turnover.
Departures / turnover signals
categorypublic evidenceverification statusfollow up
Founder departuresYC lists active founders Paul Copplestone and Ant WilsonverifiedConfirm founder vesting, roles and key-person plans
Executive turnoverNo comprehensive public turnover schedule foundnot_publicly_verifiableProvide two-year executive and R&D attrition by month/function
Employee relationsNo material public issue identified in standard screenunverifiedProvide complaints, investigations and employment claims schedule
Chapter 08

08Legal and Related Matters

Public legal terms and IP snippets exist; litigation, insurance, contracts and regulatory history need counsel review.

VIII.A Pending lawsuits against the Company

inconclusive confidence: medium

Public web search did not surface a clear pending lawsuit against Supabase, but this is inconclusive without docket searches.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VIII.A where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Litigation search incompleteness

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Pending lawsuits against the Company.
Pending lawsuits against company
casecourt or sourcestatusdiligence action
No clear pending lawsuit surfaced in public web searchDuckDuckGo lawsuit searchinconclusiveRun PACER/state/international docket search
India network-blocking articles/snippetsSearch snippets, not direct legal docketreputational/regulatory signal onlyAsk counsel for any takedown/blocking notices and jurisdictional responses
Legal and regulatory timeline Timeline of public legal/compliance/IP-relevant events and gaps.

VIII.B Pending lawsuits initiated by Company

inconclusive confidence: medium

Public web search did not surface clear plaintiff-side litigation by Supabase, but counsel confirmation is required.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VIII.B where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Litigation search incompleteness

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Pending lawsuits initiated by Company.
Pending lawsuits initiated by company
matterpublic evidencestatusdiligence action
Supabase as plaintiffNo clear public result found in standard searchinconclusiveCounsel docket search and IP-enforcement schedule
Open-source/IP enforcementNo public enforcement action identifiednot_publicly_verifiableRequest cease-and-desist, infringement and trademark-opposition history

VIII.C Environmental and employee safety issues and liabilities

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No environmental or workplace-safety liabilities are public; remote/software profile lowers but does not eliminate employment-safety compliance needs.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VIII.C.1, VIII.C.2 where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Remote global operating compliance

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Environmental and employee safety issues and liabilities.

VIII.D Material patents, copyrights, licenses, and trademarks

partially verified confidence: medium

Trademark snippets show Supabase-related records; official trademark and open-source IP chain require counsel review.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VIII.D where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Trademark chain and brand protection

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Material patents, copyrights, licenses, and trademarks.
Material IP assets
assetjurisdiction or licensestatusrisk or request
supabase/supabase source codeApache-2.0verified via GitHub APIReview third-party dependency notices and contributor agreements
SUPABASE word/design trademarksUSPTO-related snippetspartially_verifiedReview official TSDR ownership/assignments/oppositions
OrioleDB/storage-engine IPOpen-source/company acquisition contextpartially_verifiedReview acquisition documents, invention assignments, patents and licenses

VIII.E Insurance coverage and material exposures

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Insurance limits, exclusions, cyber coverage and claims history are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VIII.E where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Reliability/SLA exposure

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Insurance coverage and material exposures.

VIII.F Material contracts

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Material customer, cloud, investor, acquisition and employment contracts are not public; DPA provides only standard public legal terms.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VIII.F where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Privacy and data-processing obligations

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Material contracts.

VIII.G Regulatory agency problems

verified confidence: medium

Public docs/DPA/status materials verify privacy, shared-responsibility and operational obligations; agency-action history remains unverified by comprehensive regulator search.

Evidence gaps

  • Private data-room evidence required for checklist VIII.G where public sources are silent.

Hidden risks

  • Shared-responsibility misconfiguration risk
  • Privacy and data-processing obligations
  • Reliability/SLA exposure

Follow-up questions

  • Provide company-certified materials responsive to Regulatory agency problems.
Regulatory, contracts and operational legal matters
matterpublic evidenceverificationprivate request
DPA/privacy rolesDPA covers database/tooling services and continuous processingverifiedSigned customer DPAs, subprocessors, TIAs and breach log
Shared responsibility/securityDocs assign customer responsibility for data/access/security controlsverifiedSecurity questionnaires, SOC/ISO reports, customer incident tickets
Status/incidents/SLAPublic status page surfaced by searchverifiedIncident export, postmortems, SLA credits and enterprise SLAs
Insurance/contractsNo limits/contracts public beyond standard legal docsnot_publicly_verifiableCyber/E&O/D&O policies, cloud/customer/material contracts
Legal and operating risk heatmap Maps risk register severity and likelihood.
Regulatory and responsibility control map Shows privacy/security responsibility interfaces among customer, Supabase and suppliers.

Evidence

Evidence claims
IDClaimStatusSources
EC-001 Supabase is listed by Y Combinator as an active Summer 2020 company in developer tools/open source/databases in the San Francisco Bay Area. verified high SRC-001
EC-002 Supabase announced a $100M Series E at a $5B pre-money valuation led by Accel and Peak XV with existing investors including YC, Coatue, Felicis, Craft and Square Peg; Figma joined the round. verified high SRC-002SRC-015
EC-003 A public news snippet reports Supabase raised a $200M Series D at a $2B valuation in April 2025. partially verified medium SRC-016
EC-004 Supabase has not been shown by public research to have IPO’d, been acquired, or shut down; YC lists it active and LinkedIn lists it privately held. verified high SRC-001SRC-008SRC-002
EC-005 Supabase pricing includes Free, Pro from $25/month, Team from $599/month, and Enterprise custom pricing with usage-based compute and add-ons. verified high SRC-003
EC-006 Supabase’s public product positioning is a Postgres development platform with database, auth, instant APIs, realtime, storage and edge functions. verified high SRC-001SRC-008SRC-009
EC-007 Supabase’s public GitHub repository is Apache-2.0 licensed and had 102,786 stars, 12,494 forks, 1,046 open issues, and a 2026-05-21 push during research. verified high SRC-005
EC-008 Supabase blog claimed it reached 100,000 GitHub stars and eight million developers building with Supabase in April 2026. partially verified medium SRC-009
EC-009 Supabase’s company customer-story index lists customers including Chatbase, Brevo, eXp Realty, GovSignals, Kayhan Space, Phoenix Energy, Rally, Udio, Deriv, Resend and others. verified medium SRC-004
EC-010 Search snippets for Supabase customer stories cite use cases at Udio, eXp Realty, Kayhan Space and Phoenix Energy with scaling, enterprise innovation, developer speed and migration claims. partially verified medium SRC-017SRC-018SRC-019SRC-020
EC-011 Supabase careers page states the company has 280+ team members in 55+ countries, $500M raised, 540,000+ community members and 1,500+ contributors. verified medium SRC-007
EC-012 LinkedIn lists Supabase as privately held, founded in 2020, in IT Services and IT Consulting, with company size 201-500 and 357 discoverable employees. verified medium SRC-008
EC-013 Supabase is 100% remote/distributed with no offices according to YC, Careers and Series E materials. verified high SRC-001SRC-002SRC-007
EC-014 Supabase acquired or brought in the Oriole team to work on a faster Postgres storage engine, pluggable storage, and decoupled storage/compute. verified high SRC-010
EC-015 Supabase docs define a shared responsibility model: customers remain responsible for account access, data, access management, database schema and security controls; Supabase handles infrastructure responsibilities. verified high SRC-011
EC-016 Supabase production documentation recommends RLS, SSL enforcement, network restrictions, MFA, load testing, indexes and availability preparation before production. verified high SRC-012
EC-017 Supabase projects are deployed to one primary region; docs list general and exact AWS regions across Americas, Europe, APAC and other AWS geographies. verified high SRC-013
EC-018 Supabase’s DPA states services involve database/tooling services for web and mobile applications and covered data processing can be continuous for storage, deletion, rectification, analysis, transfer and aggregation. verified high SRC-014
EC-019 Public search did not identify a clear pending lawsuit against Supabase, but the search was not a comprehensive docket review. inconclusive low SRC-022
EC-020 Public search did not identify clear lawsuits initiated by Supabase; this remains not publicly verifiable without docket searches and counsel confirmation. inconclusive low SRC-022
EC-021 Public trademark search snippets identify Supabase-related trademark records, including a Supabase, Inc. registration and a prior SUPABASE record. partially verified medium SRC-021
EC-022 Supabase has a public status page surfaced in search results with incident update subscriptions. verified medium SRC-023
EC-023 Supabase’s public GitHub organization is verified, US-located, and had 151 public repositories and 10,127 followers during research. verified high SRC-006
EC-024 Revenue, ARR, gross margin, churn, customer concentration, backlog, AR aging, debt, option pool and cap table details are not public. not publicly verifiable high SRC-002SRC-003SRC-004
EC-025 Supabase competes across developer database/backend platforms where the basis of competition includes open-source Postgres alignment, breadth of backend services, pricing, compliance, scale and developer experience. partially verified medium SRC-003SRC-005SRC-009
EC-026 Supabase’s marketing and distribution motion is strongly product-led and developer-community-led, supported by free tier, public docs, open source GitHub traction, customer stories and community claims. partially verified high SRC-003SRC-004SRC-005SRC-007SRC-009
EC-027 Management details publicly verify founders Paul Copplestone and Ant Wilson through YC; a complete executive roster, board, compensation and turnover history are not public. partially verified medium SRC-001SRC-007SRC-008
Sources
IDPublisherTitleAccessed
SRC-001 Y Combinator Y Combinator company profile: Supabase 2026-05-21
SRC-002 Supabase Supabase Series E 2026-05-21
SRC-003 Supabase Pricing & Fees | Supabase 2026-05-21
SRC-004 Supabase Customer Stories | Supabase 2026-05-21
SRC-005 GitHub GitHub API repository metadata for supabase/supabase 2026-05-21
SRC-006 GitHub GitHub API organization metadata for Supabase 2026-05-21
SRC-007 Supabase Careers | Supabase 2026-05-21
SRC-008 LinkedIn Supabase | LinkedIn company profile 2026-05-21
SRC-009 Supabase 100,000 GitHub stars 2026-05-21
SRC-010 Supabase Oriole joins Supabase 2026-05-21
SRC-011 Supabase Shared Responsibility Model | Supabase Docs 2026-05-21
SRC-012 Supabase Production Checklist | Supabase Docs 2026-05-21
SRC-013 Supabase Available regions | Supabase Docs 2026-05-21
SRC-014 Supabase Supabase DPA (August 5, 2025) 2026-05-21
SRC-015 TechCrunch TechCrunch coverage: Supabase $5B valuation 2026-05-21
SRC-016 Yahoo Finance / Fortune Fortune/Yahoo coverage: Supabase Series D 2026-05-21
SRC-017 Supabase / DuckDuckGo snippet Udio | Supabase Customer Stories search result 2026-05-21
SRC-018 Supabase / DuckDuckGo snippet eXp Realty | Supabase Customer Stories search result 2026-05-21
SRC-019 Supabase / DuckDuckGo snippet Kayhan Space | Supabase Customer Stories search result 2026-05-21
SRC-020 Supabase / DuckDuckGo snippet Phoenix Energy | Supabase Customer Stories search result 2026-05-21
SRC-021 DuckDuckGo / USPTO.report snippets DuckDuckGo search results for Supabase USPTO trademark 2026-05-21
SRC-022 DuckDuckGo DuckDuckGo search results for Supabase lawsuits 2026-05-21
SRC-023 DuckDuckGo / Supabase Status snippets DuckDuckGo search results for Supabase status incidents 2026-05-21

Disclaimer

This report is a public-evidence diligence snapshot, not investment advice. Important financial, legal, technical, and contractual facts remain non-public and should be verified directly with management and primary documents before any investment decision.