Startup Diligence
Diligence report Enterprise data analytics, open lakehouse, Trino-based federated query and AI data platform software Private unicorn / growth-stage enterprise software company

Starburst

Starburst Startup Diligence Report

Proceed only to confirmatory diligence. Public evidence supports a credible enterprise data/lakehouse platform built on Trino with named enterprise customers and cloud-channel reach; valuation and risk acceptance require audited financials, ARR/customer schedules, technical benchmarks, trust/security documents, cap table and counsel review.

Company profile

Starburst Startup Diligence Report

Eligible for public-source diligence: Starburst appears to remain an operating private unicorn with strong public financing, product, customer, partner and technical-lineage signals, but the investability question turns on private validation of ARR quality, customer concentration, current valuation, cap-table economics, security posture and legal/IP matters.

Website
www.starburst.io
Sector
Enterprise data analytics, open lakehouse, Trino-based federated query and AI data platform software
Geography
Boston, Massachusetts, United States; global enterprise software market
Stage
Private unicorn / growth-stage enterprise software company
Known aliases
Starburst, Starburst Data, Starburst Data, Inc., Starburst Enterprise, Starburst Galaxy
Report version
1.0
Timezone
UTC

Executive summary

Strengths

  • CB Insights lists Starburst as a $3.35B Boston Enterprise Tech unicorn and public sources show active operations.
  • Starburst announced a $250M Series D at a $3.35B valuation and SEC Form D corroborates an approximately $250M exempt offering.
  • Company product pages and Trino documentation support Galaxy, Enterprise and Icehouse as Trino/open-lakehouse products.
  • Public materials name large enterprise customers and a FINRA case study describes a 25PB Starburst Enterprise deployment.

Risks

  • The $3.35B valuation is a stale 2022 last-round/list value, not current fair value.
  • Revenue/ARR quality, gross margin, burn and runway are not publicly verifiable.
  • Customer concentration, renewal status, churn and NRR are hidden behind public logos.

Gaps

  • Audited financial statements, ARR bridge, billings, gross margin, burn, cash and forecasts.
  • Cap table, preferences, option pool, debt, 409A and financing documents.
  • Top-customer ARR/contracts, NRR/GRR, churn, renewals and reference calls.
  • Product telemetry, roadmap, independent performance benchmarks and SKU-level gross margin.
  • SOC reports, security incidents, litigation documents, IP assignments and insurance schedules.

Recommended next steps

  • Run confirmatory financial, customer and cap-table diligence before relying on valuation.
  • Pull PACER/counsel materials for Starburst Data, Inc. v. Hewitt and confirm official USPTO/IP records.
  • Conduct technical diligence on Trino differentiation, Icehouse/AIDA maturity, Varada integration and security controls.
  • Validate GTM efficiency through CRM export, channel attribution, marketplace bookings and customer references.

Risk register

high high likelihood

R-001: Stale last-round valuation

The $3.35B valuation is a 2022 private financing/list value, not a current audited fair-value mark.

Diligence request: Request current 409A, secondary transactions, board valuation materials and investor marks.

high high likelihood

R-002: Revenue, ARR quality and unit economics not public

Public sources disclose growth percentages, not audited revenue, ARR bridge, gross margin, COGS, burn or runway.

Diligence request: Obtain audited financials, ARR bridge, billing exports, product gross margin, cloud COGS and budget vs actuals.

high high likelihood

R-004: Intense lakehouse/hyperscaler competition

Starburst competes with Databricks, Dremio, hyperscaler query services, cloud warehouses and open-source Trino alternatives.

Diligence request: Review win/loss, pricing, displacement data, retention by competitor and differentiation benchmarks.

high medium likelihood

R-003: Customer concentration and renewal quality unknown

Public customer logos and case studies do not prove current ARR, concentration, renewal status, churn or NRR.

Diligence request: Request top-customer ARR, contracts, cohorts, usage telemetry and independent references.

high medium likelihood

R-007: Security/privacy evidence is access-gated

Trust Center and privacy policy are public, but SOC reports, exceptions, pentests, incident logs and DPAs were not reviewed.

Diligence request: Obtain trust-center documents, SOC bridge letters, pentest, subprocessors, DPIA and incident log.

high unknown likelihood

R-011: Cap-table preferences and debt unknown

Public rounds and Form D do not disclose preferences, debt, warrants, side letters, option pool or current ownership.

Diligence request: Review cap table, equity plans, debt instruments, investor rights and liquidation waterfall.

medium high likelihood

R-005: Open-source substitution and IP boundary risk

Trino creates credibility but also enables self-managed substitution and requires clear open-source/trademark/IP boundaries.

Diligence request: Review open-source licenses, contributor agreements, Trino/Starburst trademark rights and proprietary differentiation.

medium medium likelihood

R-006: Deployment complexity and performance claims

Federated/lakehouse performance depends on connectors, data locality, cloud costs, workload management and Varada integration results.

Diligence request: Run architecture review, customer benchmark validation, incident/support analysis and product telemetry review.

Chapter 01

01Financial Information

Public evidence verifies Starburst's unicorn financing history and $3.35B last-round/list valuation, but audited financials, ARR bridge, unit economics, cash runway and cap-table terms are private.

I.A Annual and quarterly financial information for the past three years

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

No audited annual/quarterly financial statements, management accounts, product/channel/geography revenue, backlog or AR aging were public; only financing and 3X ARR/customer-growth claims are public.

Evidence gaps

  • Audited/reviewed financial statements for FY2023-FY2025 and YTD 2026.
  • ARR bridge, billings, revenue-recognition policy, gross margin, COGS, backlog and AR aging.

Hidden risks

  • Revenue recognition and cloud gross margin may diverge materially from public ARR-growth messaging.
  • Customer contracts and marketplace sales could create complex revenue-recognition or deferred-revenue patterns.

Follow-up questions

  • How is ARR defined and reconciled to GAAP revenue?
  • What are gross margin and burn by product and deployment model?
Public revenue / ARR / unit-economic signals
itempublic evidenceverification statusdiligence request
ARR/customer growthSeries D release says Starburst had 3X customer and ARR growth.partially_verifiedARR bridge, ARR definition, billings/revenue reconciliation, cohort retention and customer count.
Audited revenue / GAAP financialsNo public audited income statement, balance sheet or cash-flow statements found.not_publicly_verifiableAudited/reviewed financial statements, management accounts and revenue-recognition memo.
Gross margin / cloud COGSProduct pages imply cloud and self-managed deployment but do not disclose gross margin or COGS.not_publicly_verifiableProduct-level gross margin, cloud-commit utilization, support cost and professional-services margin.
Cash runway / burn / debtFinancing amount is public; cash, burn, debt and runway are not.not_publicly_verifiableCash, monthly burn, runway, debt/lines, covenant and latest board-approved budget.

I.B Financial Projections

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

No public three-year projections, budget-vs-actuals, capex/working-capital assumptions or external financing plan were available.

Evidence gaps

  • Board-approved forecast, scenarios, pipeline coverage, pricing assumptions, hiring plan, cloud spend and financing needs.

Hidden risks

  • Forecasts may rely on aggressive enterprise expansion, AI/lakehouse demand or partner-channel conversion not supported by public metrics.

Follow-up questions

  • What are base/downside/upside ARR, revenue, margin and cash scenarios?
  • What external financing or debt assumptions are embedded?

I.C Capital Structure

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Public evidence names major investors and confirms a 2022 Form D amount, but shares outstanding, option pool, preferences, debt, warrants and off-balance-sheet liabilities are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Current cap table, liquidation waterfall, debt/warrants, option grants, 409A reports, investor rights and board consents.

Hidden risks

  • Multiple late-stage preferred rounds could include liquidation preferences, participation, ratchets or side letters that impair new-money/common economics.

Follow-up questions

  • What are fully diluted ownership and liquidation preferences by class?
  • Are there debt, SAFEs, warrants, secondary sales or ROFR obligations?
Capital structure / ownership snapshot
stakeholder or instrumentpublic positiondiligence caveatverification status
Founders and managementJustin Borgman, Matt Fuller and Martin Traverso are public founders/leaders.Founder ownership, vesting, retention and option holdings are private.partially_verified
Venture investorsIndex, Coatue, Andreessen Horowitz, Salesforce Ventures, Alkeon, Altimeter and B Capital are publicly named across rounds.Exact ownership, preferences, side letters and board/control rights are private.partially_verified
Preferred shares / SAFEs / notesForm D confirms securities offering amount but not instrument terms.Liquidation preferences, conversion, anti-dilution and debt are not public.not_publicly_verifiable
Options and employee equityNo public option-pool schedule found.Need option plan, grants, exercises, repurchases, 409A history and dilution schedule.not_publicly_verifiable

I.D Other financial information

partially verified confidence: medium

Public financing history is relatively strong; tax positions, accounting policies and financing economics remain private.

Evidence gaps

  • Tax positions, NOLs, revenue policies, board materials, investor consents and financing closing documents.

Hidden risks

  • Financing history may include secondary components or investor terms not disclosed in announcements.

Follow-up questions

  • Were any financing proceeds secondary?
  • What tax/NOL and accounting-policy positions could affect valuation?
Public funding-round history
dateroundamountlead or participantsvaluation or post moneyevidenceverification status
2019-11-20Series A$22MIndex Venturesnot_publicly_verifiableStarburst Series A release/snippets state $22M Series A led by Index Ventures.partially_verified
2020 (publication date not captured)Series B$42MCoatue; existing investorsnot_publicly_verifiableStarburst blog states it raised $42M Series B and added Coatue.verified
2021-01-06Series C$100MAndreessen Horowitz; Salesforce Ventures; Coatue; Index Ventures$1.2B valuationSeries C release announced $100M, $164M total financing and $1.2B valuation.verified
2022-02-09 / Form D 2022-03-30Series D / exempt offering$250M announced; $249,999,942 Form D soldAlkeon Capital; Altimeter; B Capital; a16z; Coatue; Index; Salesforce Ventures$3.35B valuationSeries D release and SEC Form D align on approximate amount.verified
2026-05-30 accessedCB Insights current unicorn-list valuenot a financing eventIndex Ventures; Coatue Management; Andreessen Horowitz$3.35B list valuationCB Insights row lists Starburst at $3.35B.verified

Funding announcements do not disclose security preferences, secondaries, debt or current valuation marks.

Starburst public funding and corporate timeline Timeline of founding, public financings, acquisition and legal/status milestones.
Implied public valuation trajectory Line chart of publicly disclosed private valuation anchors.

Null points are deliberate diligence-request markers.

Chapter 02

02Products

Starburst publicly offers a Trino-based product portfolio spanning fully managed Galaxy, self-managed Enterprise and Icehouse/open-lakehouse positioning, with pricing, margins, roadmap maturity and independent performance validation largely private.

II.A Description of each product

partially verified confidence: medium

Public product evidence verifies Galaxy, Enterprise, Icehouse, connector/client ecosystem and Trino technical foundation; market share, cost structure, product-level profitability and roadmap dates remain private.

Evidence gaps

  • Product telemetry, attach rate by SKU, implementation effort, customer NPS, roadmap, benchmark data and product-level gross margin.

Hidden risks

  • Product differentiation may erode if hyperscalers and open-source Trino cover enough workloads at lower incremental cost.
  • Connector support breadth can create hidden engineering/support obligations and lower margins.

Follow-up questions

  • Which SKUs drive ARR and gross margin?
  • What percentage of workloads can be served by open-source Trino or hyperscaler alternatives?
Product / SKU matrix
productaudiencekey featurespublic evidenceverification status
Starburst GalaxyCloud-first enterprise analytics and AI teamsFully managed multi-cloud platform; cloud on AWS/GCP/Azure; start-free/contact motion.Galaxy page says fully managed and multi-cloud.verified
Starburst EnterpriseSelf-managed, hybrid, regulated and on-prem enterprise deploymentsEnterprise-grade Trino distribution; 50+ data sources; performance/security/governance.Enterprise page describes supported Trino and 50+ sources.verified
Starburst IcehouseOpen lakehouse adopters using Apache Iceberg and TrinoIceberg + Trino open lakehouse architecture for AI/enterprise intelligence.Icehouse page says Icehouse: Iceberg + Trino.verified
AIDA / trusted agentic interfaceBusiness users needing conversational analytics over governed dataSite navigation describes AIDA as conversational analytics on governed data.Homepage/product navigation includes new AIDA feature.partially_verified
Pricing and packaging public comparison
offeringpublic pricing signalcommercial implicationverification status
Starburst GalaxyStart Free and Contact Us CTAs; no price card captured.Likely mixed product-led and enterprise sales motion; price realization unknown.partially_verified
Starburst EnterpriseEnterprise page/product navigation; no public list pricing.Discounting, services attach and renewal economics require private data.not_publicly_verifiable
Open-source TrinoOpen-source project available independently of Starburst.Sophisticated buyers may self-manage or use managed alternatives, pressuring price/value capture.verified
Competitive cloud/lakehouse platformsCompetitors market lakehouse/query services; pricing varies by compute/consumption.Need win/loss and pricing-discount analysis against hyperscalers/Databricks/Dremio/Snowflake.partially_verified

Public pricing was too thin for ACV or margin benchmarking.

Starburst product and dependency architecture High-level architecture from users and BI clients through Galaxy/Enterprise, Trino, connectors and data sources.
Chapter 03

03Customer Information

Public customer proof includes credible enterprise logos and a detailed FINRA case study, but revenue concentration, contract status, churn, top suppliers and severed relationships are not publicly verifiable.

III.A Top customers by application

partially verified confidence: medium

Named public customers include FINRA, Comcast, DoorDash, Apache Corporation, Priceline, VMware, Conde Nast and Zalando; only FINRA had a detailed public scale case in this run.

Evidence gaps

  • Top-15 customer list for FY2024-FY2026 YTD by ARR/application, deployment type, contract status and reference contacts.

Hidden risks

  • Logo pages may include former, small or non-renewing customers; case studies can persist after material usage changes.

Follow-up questions

  • Which customers account for more than 5% of ARR?
  • Which public logos are current paid production deployments?
Publicly known customers and case studies
customersourceuse case or signalpublic evidenceverification status
FINRACase study and public listsAWS/S3 data lake analytics at 25PB and about 100B rows/dayCase study describes FINRA selecting Starburst Enterprise.partially_verified
ComcastSeries C release / PR list / homepageNamed public customer; Comcast architect award mentionSeries C and PR Newswire list Comcast.partially_verified
DoorDashPR Newswire / customer page featureNamed customer; public customer story/video existsPR Newswire lists Doordash; customer page featured DoorDash logo/video.partially_verified
Apache Corporation / Priceline / VMwarePR Newswire boilerplateNamed enterprise logosPR Newswire lists these companies as trusted by Starburst.partially_verified
Conde Nast / ZalandoSeries C releaseNamed public customers in 2021Series C release lists them as customers.partially_verified
Top-15 customers by ARRNot publicRevenue concentration unknownNo customer ARR schedule found.not_publicly_verifiable

III.B Strategic relationships

partially verified confidence: medium

Public partnerships include cloud marketplaces, Dell solution positioning, BI/Tableau integration and partner-award ecosystem mentions; revenue contribution and agreement terms are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Partner contracts, pipeline/source attribution, co-sell data, marketplace terms and support responsibility matrix.

Hidden risks

  • Marketplace and partner revenue may carry fees, lower margin, co-sell obligations or support costs not visible publicly.

Follow-up questions

  • What ARR is sourced through each partner/channel?
  • What exclusivity, discounting or support obligations exist?
Strategic relationships and partnerships
partnernaturepublic evidencediligence gap
AWS MarketplaceCloud procurement/deployment channelDocs say SEP is available directly through AWS Marketplace.Marketplace bookings, fees and co-sell terms.
Microsoft Azure MarketplacePreferred solution / marketplace channelDocs say SEP is available as a Microsoft preferred solution through Azure Marketplace.Azure-sourced ARR and support obligations.
Google Cloud MarketplaceMarketplace / GKE deployment channelDocs say SEP is available through Google Cloud Platform Marketplace.GCP revenue contribution and partner terms.
DellJoint data analytics/lakehouse solutionDell Data Analytics Engine page says powered by Starburst.Reseller/OEM agreement, attach rate, support split and margins.
Tableau / BI ecosystemIntegrationDocs say Tableau can connect via Starburst/ODBC/JDBC connectors.Usage telemetry and support burden.
Accenture, Slalom, Capgemini, Deloitte, Red Hat, Tackle.ioAward/partner ecosystem mentionsData Rebel/Partner Awards named partner categories.Active pipeline and revenue share not public.

III.C Revenue by customer

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Revenue by customer and customer concentration are not publicly verifiable; public customer-proof chart intentionally uses proof counts, not revenue.

Evidence gaps

  • Customer ARR schedule, NRR/GRR, churn, expansion, renewal dates, committed consumption and customer-support load.

Hidden risks

  • A small number of large enterprise or regulated customers could dominate ARR, renewals or support burden.

Follow-up questions

  • Does any customer exceed 5% of ARR?
  • What are renewal and churn trends for public-logo customers?
Customer public-proof concentration chart Bar chart using public-proof counts, not revenue, because customer ARR is not public.

Use only as public-proof visualization, not revenue concentration.

III.D Significant relationships severed within the last two years

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

No public schedule of severed customer, partner or supplier relationships was found.

Evidence gaps

  • Lost customer/partner/supplier list, churn reasons, win-back pipeline and terminated contracts.

Hidden risks

  • Loss of a marquee logo or cloud/channel partner could be obscured if historical logos remain online.

Follow-up questions

  • Which public logos have churned or downsized in the last 24 months?
  • Have any cloud/partner relationships been terminated or materially changed?

III.E Top suppliers

partially verified confidence: medium

Public architecture suggests dependencies on AWS/Azure/GCP, Trino, Apache Iceberg/open formats, connectors, BI tools and marketplace partners, but spend concentration and supplier agreements are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Vendor contracts, cloud commitments, marketplace terms, support SLAs and top supplier spend for FY2024-FY2026 YTD.

Hidden risks

  • Cloud committed-spend obligations, marketplace fees and connector maintenance may materially affect gross margin.

Follow-up questions

  • What cloud provider concentration and committed spend exist?
  • Which connectors or third-party systems drive most support cost?
Top supplier / cloud-and-infrastructure dependency
supplier or dependencyrolepublic evidenceconcentration risk
AWSCloud platform, marketplace, FINRA case-study deploymentGalaxy runs on AWS; FINRA case used AWS/S3; AWS Marketplace docs exist.Cloud COGS, committed spend and service limits require review.
Azure / GCPCloud platforms and marketplacesGalaxy/Enterprise pages and marketplace docs reference Azure and GCP.Partner/channel terms and multi-cloud support costs unknown.
Trino open-source projectCore query engine lineageTrino docs define distributed SQL engine; Starburst markets Trino foundation.Open-source substitution, community governance and license/trademark boundaries.
Apache Iceberg / open table formatsOpen lakehouse foundationIcehouse page says Iceberg + Trino.Market standard shifts or competitor control around open table formats.
BI/ETL/data-source ecosystemConnectors, clients and integrationsDocs list connectors and clients including Tableau/ODBC/JDBC.Connector maintenance and partner API changes can create support load.
Chapter 04

04Competition

Starburst competes in a crowded data lakehouse/federated analytics market against Databricks, Dremio, Snowflake/cloud warehouses, AWS Athena/hyperscalers and open-source Trino.

IV.A Competitive landscape by market segment

partially verified confidence: medium

Public evidence supports broad competitive overlap; actual market share, win/loss and pricing pressure are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Win/loss by competitor, pricing/discount logs, proof-of-concept conversion, product benchmarks and churn reasons.

Hidden risks

  • Hyperscalers can bundle compute credits and native integrations to pressure Starburst's price realization.
  • Open-source or community Trino may limit proprietary capture among technically sophisticated buyers.

Follow-up questions

  • What workloads does Starburst consistently win vs Databricks/Dremio/Athena/Snowflake/open Trino?
  • How much discounting is required to win enterprise deals?
Competitor comparison matrix
competitorsegmentproduct overlapdifferentiator or pressuresource
DatabricksLakehouse / AI data platformEnterprise lakehouse analytics and governance budgetsBroad platform and AI ecosystem; may bundle compute/storage/governance.Databricks lakehouse page
DremioSQL lakehouse / data lake analyticsOpen lakehouse SQL analyticsDirect lakehouse positioning and performance claims.Dremio homepage
AWS AthenaHyperscaler serverless querySQL query directly over S3/data lakesNative cloud bundling and consumption pricing.AWS Athena docs
Snowflake / BigQuery / RedshiftCloud data warehouse/lakehouseAnalytics workloads, governance and data sharingBundled incumbents with procurement leverage.Public category analysis from competitor pages/search
Open-source Trino self-managedOpen-source alternativeCore distributed SQL query engineZero license cost if buyer self-manages; Starburst must justify support/security/performance premium.Trino docs/project
Basis-of-competition scoring
axisstarburst positioncompetitor pressurediligence test
Open/hybrid data accessFederated Trino-based analytics across hybrid sources.Open-source Trino and Dremio overlap.Win/loss by workload, connector and deployment type.
Managed cloud convenienceGalaxy fully managed on AWS/GCP/Azure.Athena/BigQuery/Snowflake/Databricks native cloud platforms.Conversion from trial to paid, cloud COGS and SLA history.
Performance/costVarada integration and Enterprise claims emphasize performance/cost.Warehouses and hyperscalers optimize bundled performance.Independent benchmarks and customer workload telemetry.
Governance/securityRBAC, access controls and trust center.Incumbent data clouds have mature governance suites.SOC exceptions, IAM architecture, data-lineage and policy enforcement.
Procurement/channelCloud marketplaces and Dell/BI partners.Hyperscalers can bundle credits and marketplace commitments.Partner-source bookings and renewal rates.
Open lakehouse competitive market map Positioning map for Starburst and major alternatives across openness/hybrid reach and platform breadth.

Coordinates are analyst judgment based on public positioning, not market share data.

Chapter 05

05Marketing, Sales, and Distribution

Public GTM appears enterprise/direct-sales led with free trials, cloud marketplaces, partners, events/content and open-source community credibility; pipeline, CAC, productivity and conversion metrics are private.

V.A Strategy and implementation

partially verified confidence: medium

Starburst markets open/hybrid lakehouse analytics through public product pages, customer proof, events, cloud marketplaces and partner ecosystem signals.

Evidence gaps

  • Marketing plan, channel pipeline, campaign ROI, sourced ARR, partner bookings and geographic revenue mix.

Hidden risks

  • AI/lakehouse messaging may run ahead of product maturity or customer adoption.
  • Events/content may create awareness without efficient pipeline conversion.

Follow-up questions

  • What channels source qualified pipeline and ARR?
  • How is AI/Icehouse messaging converting into paid deployments?
Distribution channels and GTM motions
channelpublic evidencelikely rolegap
Direct enterprise salesContact Us CTAs, Enterprise SKU, enterprise logos and sales roles.Primary motion for large accounts.Pipeline, quota, sales cycle, win rates and CAC.
Product-led/free trialStart Free link on Galaxy/Icehouse pages.Developer/evaluator entry point.Trial signups, activation, conversion and expansion.
Cloud marketplacesAWS, Azure and GCP marketplace documentation.Procurement acceleration and co-sell.Marketplace-sourced ARR and fees.
Partner/channel ecosystemDell solution and partner award categories.Enterprise solution/channel leverage.Partner-sourced pipeline, reseller margins and support obligations.
Open-source/content/eventsTrino heritage, resources and AI & Datanova event CTAs.Community credibility and developer awareness.Attribution from open-source/community to bookings.
Public marketing-signal summary
signalpublic evidenceanalyst readverification status
Customer logos and case studiesHomepage/customer pages and PR list named multiple enterprises.Credibility for enterprise category selling; still need current logo permission and ARR.partially_verified
Datanova / Data Rebel awardsPR Newswire announcement named customer and partner award winners.Community/partner marketing program around data-lake category.verified
AI & Datanova 2026 event CTASite navigation promotes AI & Datanova 2026 in Miami.Messaging pivot toward AI/enterprise intelligence.verified
Technical resourcesSite promotes Data Engineers Guide to Iceberg v3 and resources.Content supports developer/architect lead generation.verified

V.B Major Customers

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Major customer status and future growth are not public; public logos require current-contract and expansion validation.

Evidence gaps

  • Account plans, expansion pipeline, renewal dates, health scores and executive sponsor maps for top accounts.

Hidden risks

  • Major-customer relationships may have stalled, churned or consolidated without public disclosure.

Follow-up questions

  • What is the expansion pipeline for FINRA/Comcast/DoorDash and other named logos?
  • Which major customers are references?

V.C Principal avenues for generating new business

partially verified confidence: medium

Public evidence indicates new-business avenues through cloud marketplaces, open-source/technical content, events, direct sales, free trials and partners.

Evidence gaps

  • Lead-source attribution, free-trial conversion, marketplace bookings, partner pipeline and customer acquisition cost by channel.

Hidden risks

  • Attribution may be difficult because open-source/community, marketplace and direct sales can overlap.

Follow-up questions

  • What are conversion rates by source and segment?
  • What percentage of ARR is marketplace-committed spend versus direct contracts?
Public GTM funnel Funnel from community/content awareness through enterprise procurement; counts are private.

All counts are null because funnel metrics are private.

V.D Sales force productivity model

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Sales compensation, quotas, sales cycle, ramp, hiring plan and productivity model are not public; public open roles show active GTM hiring.

Evidence gaps

  • Sales roster, quotas, attainment, ramp, comp plans, CAC/payback and pipeline coverage.

Hidden risks

  • If enterprise sales cycles are long and technical POCs costly, CAC payback could be worse than public growth narrative implies.

Follow-up questions

  • What is median sales cycle and quota attainment?
  • How costly are proofs-of-concept and technical sales support?

V.E Ability to implement marketing plan with current and projected budgets

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

No marketing budget, CAC, channel ROI or forecasted budget was public.

Evidence gaps

  • Marketing budget, CAC by channel, campaign ROI, event ROI and board-approved hiring/spend plan.

Hidden risks

  • Marketing spend may be inefficient if category messaging is crowded and enterprise conversion requires heavy technical selling.

Follow-up questions

  • What is CAC payback by channel and segment?
  • Which marketing programs are being scaled or cut?
Chapter 06

06Research and Development

Starburst has credible public technical lineage through Trino and visible R&D themes around Icehouse, AIDA, connectors, security and Varada integration; cost, roadmap execution, support burden and IP chain are private.

VI.A Description of R&D organization

partially verified confidence: medium

Public materials identify technical leadership and open roles tied to Trino engine, security and engineering; full R&D org, costs and productivity are private.

Evidence gaps

  • R&D org chart, sprint/roadmap, headcount/cost by team, attrition, code ownership, IP assignments and security SDLC.

Hidden risks

  • Key-person dependency around Trino creators/engine expertise could impair roadmap if retention weakens.
  • Distributed engineering across India/Poland/remote roles may introduce coordination and IP-assignment complexity.

Follow-up questions

  • Who owns Trino core vs proprietary features?
  • What is the R&D spend and roadmap capacity by product?
Key R&D personnel / leadership and notable hires
name or rolepublic rolebackground or relevancesource
Martin TraversoChief Technology Officer / co-founderDirect Trino/Presto technical lineage and product credibility.Starburst about page and Trino lineage sources
Matt FullerCo-founderFounder/operator continuity; detailed current scope not public.Starburst about page
Varada engineering/product leadershipJoined Starburst after acquisitionInorganic performance/indexing capability and integration risk.Varada acquisition release
Software Engineer - Trino Engine / Application Security EngineerOpen rolesShows continuing investment in core engine and security.Open roles page
R&D and product-portfolio map Portfolio view of core engine, enterprise features, Icehouse/AIDA and Varada-derived performance work.

VI.B New Product Pipeline

partially verified confidence: medium

Public pipeline signals include Icehouse, AIDA, connector/data products work and Varada-derived performance; specific dates, costs, risks and adoption are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Product roadmap, release gates, engineering cost, benchmark results, adoption by SKU, support tickets and Varada purchase/IP documents.

Hidden risks

  • AI/agentic interface features may require governance, evaluation and data-permission controls not evident in public sources.
  • Acquired Varada IP/employees may have integration or assignment risks.

Follow-up questions

  • What products are GA vs beta, and what ARR is attached?
  • What milestones and costs remain for Icehouse/AIDA/Varada integration?
Public product / research pipeline
projectpublic statusevidencerisk or gap
IcehousePublicly marketed architectureIcehouse: Iceberg + Trino for open lakehouse.Adoption, GA maturity, migration economics and roadmap private.
AIDA / agentic interfaceNew feature in site navigationConversational analytics for business users on governed data.AI governance, hallucination controls, usage and pricing private.
Connectors and data productsDocs/product pages describe connector matrix and data products/context layer.50+ data sources and connector docs; site mentions enterprise context layer/data products.Connector maintenance and support load require review.
Varada indexing/performance integrationAcquisition announced; expected rollout to select customersRelease claims up to 7x performance and 40% compute-cost reduction.Integration status, IP chain and realized customer impact private.
Chapter 07

07Management and Personnel

Public evidence verifies core founder/technical leadership and current hiring signals, but full org chart, headcount, compensation, turnover, employee relations and equity plans are private.

VII.A Organization Chart

partially verified confidence: medium

A partial public org chart can be inferred around founder/CEO and CTO/co-founder roles; full reporting lines and executive roster are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Full org chart, board roster, executive duties, succession plan and span-of-control analysis.

Hidden risks

  • Missing CFO/CRO/CISO/board visibility can hide governance, sales execution or security accountability gaps.

Follow-up questions

  • Who owns finance, sales, security, legal and customer success?
  • What are board composition and observer rights?
Public leadership/org chart Partial public org chart from company about page and known functional roles.

Reporting lines beyond public roles are analyst placeholders and require company confirmation.

VII.B Historical and projected headcount by function and location

inconclusive confidence: low

Exact historical/projected headcount is not public; open roles show current hiring in engineering, GTM, product, support and services across multiple geographies.

Evidence gaps

  • Historical monthly headcount by function/location, contractor list, hiring plan and budget.

Hidden risks

  • Hiring plans may reflect backfills rather than growth; public snippets may lag actual headcount.

Follow-up questions

  • How many employees and contractors does Starburst have by function/location?
  • Which roles are growth hires versus backfills?
Headcount and hiring signals
functionpublic signalobserved roles countdiligence request
EngineeringSecurity, Trino engine, benchmark infrastructure, staff/software engineering roles in India/Poland.10Engineering headcount, attrition, roadmap capacity and location mix.
Sales / GTMSDR, enterprise account executive, GTM university talent roles.5Sales productivity, quota, ramp, pipeline and churn by segment.
Product / marketing / support / servicesProduct management, web developer, technical support, professional services roles.7Support burden, services margins, product capacity and marketing ROI.
Total company headcountSearch snippets mention follower/employee estimates but direct profiles were inaccessible.not_headcountHRIS roster by function/location, offer plan, contractor list and attrition.

Observed role counts are approximate from public page text and should not be treated as hiring plan completeness.

Open roles by function Bar chart of approximate role counts visible on Starburst open roles page at access date.

Approximate counts from text extraction; verify with live careers page before relying.

VII.C Senior management biographies

partially verified confidence: medium

Public biographies support founder/CEO and CTO credibility but do not cover full senior management or references.

Evidence gaps

  • Executive bios, background checks, references, board assessment and succession/retention plans.

Hidden risks

  • Founder-led technical credibility may mask gaps in late-stage finance, sales operations or public-company readiness.

Follow-up questions

  • What is the complete senior team and tenure by role?
  • Have any key executives departed in the last 24 months?
Senior management roster
namerolepublic biography or signaldiligence caveat
Justin BorgmanFounder & CEOFounded Starburst in 2017; prior VP/GM at Teradata via Hadapt acquisition.Employment agreement, equity, succession and references private.
Martin TraversoChief Technology Officer / co-founderListed on company page; Trino/Presto lineage supports technical credibility.Retention/equity and reporting lines private.
Matt FullerCo-founderListed as co-founder on company page.Current operating scope and retention not public.
CFO / COO / CRO / CISONot fully verified from accessible public sourcesNo complete executive roster captured.Request full org chart, board deck, succession and background checks.

VII.D Compensation arrangements

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Executive employment agreements, compensation, bonuses, benefits and severance are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Executive employment agreements, comp plans, bonus targets, benefits, severance and retention packages.

Hidden risks

  • Retention may depend on unobserved acceleration, bonus, severance or change-of-control terms.

Follow-up questions

  • Which executives have change-of-control or retention provisions?
  • Are benefits and compensation competitive by geography?

VII.E Incentive stock plans

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Option plans, equity grants, exercise prices, vesting schedules and refresh practices are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Equity incentive plans, grant ledger, option pool, exercises, repurchases and 409A valuations.

Hidden risks

  • Late-stage private valuation resets or underwater options could impair retention.

Follow-up questions

  • What percentage of employees are underwater or under-retained?
  • What option pool increase is needed for the plan?

VII.F Significant employee relations problems, past or present

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Careers page describes remote/DEI commitments; no public employee-relations schedule or HR complaint history was available.

Evidence gaps

  • HR complaints/investigations, employee-relations log, severance agreements, worker-classification review and engagement surveys.

Hidden risks

  • Remote/global teams can create hidden classification, employment-law, payroll and culture risks.

Follow-up questions

  • Have there been discrimination, harassment, wage/hour or classification claims?
  • How are remote/global employment obligations managed?

VII.G Personnel Turnover

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

No public turnover data was found; open roles and culture statements are insufficient to assess retention.

Evidence gaps

  • Monthly hires/departures, regretted attrition, offer acceptance, retention packages and key-person risk assessment.

Hidden risks

  • High technical talent attrition could threaten roadmap and customer support, especially around Trino expertise.

Follow-up questions

  • What is attrition by function/location and level?
  • Which key engineers or GTM leaders are retention risks?
Departures / turnover / employee-relations signals
itempublic evidenceverification statusdiligence request
Turnover and regretted attritionNo public turnover schedule found.not_publicly_verifiableMonthly headcount, attrition by function/location, regretted attrition and exit interview themes.
Employee-relations claimsCareers page states values/remote/DEI commitments; no public disputes reviewed except legal search separately.inconclusiveHR complaints, investigations, severance, labor counsel letters and litigation docket review.
Compensation and retentionNo employment agreements, bonus plans or retention packages public.not_publicly_verifiableExecutive agreements, bonus plans, equity plans, retention grants and offer letters.
Chapter 08

08Legal and Related Matters

Public legal/IP diligence found a Starburst trademark record, SEC Form D, privacy/trust materials and a CourtListener-indexed Starburst Data, Inc. v. Hewitt docket; most legal, contractual, insurance and regulatory matters require counsel/data-room review.

VIII.A Pending lawsuits against the Company

inconclusive confidence: medium

Accessible public searches did not identify a defendant-side lawsuit against Starburst, but CourtListener indexes one Starburst-named case and public searches are not legal clearance.

Evidence gaps

  • Counsel litigation schedule, PACER searches, threatened claims, arbitrations and settlement agreements.

Hidden risks

  • PACER documents, arbitration, demand letters or settled disputes may be non-public.

Follow-up questions

  • Are there any pending or threatened claims against Starburst?
  • What is the status/exposure of any non-public disputes?
Pending lawsuits against the company
casecourt or indexfiled datestatussource note
No defendant-side case against Starburst identified in accessible public searchesCourtListener exact query and web searchnot_publicly_verifiableCourtListener returned one case where Starburst is a named party/plaintiff in title; PACER and counsel confirmation required.
STARBURST DATA, INC. v. HEWITTM.D.N.C. / CourtListener2025-03-18Company-initiated based on caption; docket documents not reviewedIncluded here because it is a litigation exposure even if not against Starburst.

Do not treat absence of public cases as legal clearance; run counsel/PACER searches.

VIII.B Pending lawsuits initiated by Company

partially verified confidence: medium

CourtListener indexes STARBURST DATA, INC. v. HEWITT in M.D.N.C.; complaint, claims, damages and status were not reviewed.

Evidence gaps

  • Complaint, answer, motions, orders, settlement posture, damages and counsel assessment.

Hidden risks

  • The case could involve former employee, contractor, customer or IP/commercial issues that require context.

Follow-up questions

  • What facts underlie Starburst Data, Inc. v. Hewitt?
  • Is any IP, employment or customer dispute implicated?
Pending lawsuits initiated by the company
defendantcourtdocketfiled datenature or causediligence request
Joshua Robert HewittU.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina (indexed by CourtListener)1:25-cv-002092025-03-18Contract: Other; Diversity-ConversionObtain complaint, answer, motions, orders, settlement posture, damages and counsel assessment.
Other initiated lawsuitsNot public in accessible resultsnot_publicly_verifiableAsk counsel for complete litigation schedule and threatened claims.

VIII.C Environmental and employee safety issues and liabilities

not publicly verifiable confidence: medium

As a software company, environmental/safety exposure appears limited publicly, but remote/global employment, office safety and data-center/cloud vendor responsibilities are private.

Evidence gaps

  • OSHA/safety records if any, remote-work policy, international employment compliance and office lease/safety responsibilities.

Hidden risks

  • Remote/global work can create ergonomic, payroll, tax and local employment compliance obligations.

Follow-up questions

  • Are there any workplace safety, remote-work or international employment compliance claims?

VIII.D Material patents, copyrights, licenses, and trademarks

partially verified confidence: medium

Public IP evidence includes the STARBURST trademark, Trino open-source lineage and Varada acquisition claims; official patent inventory, licenses and IP assignments require counsel review.

Evidence gaps

  • Official USPTO/TSDR records, patent list, invention assignments, open-source compliance policy, Varada purchase/IP documents and freedom-to-operate memo.

Hidden risks

  • Open-source license noncompliance, trademark conflicts or incomplete acquired-IP assignments could impair defensibility.

Follow-up questions

  • What proprietary IP differentiates Starburst from open-source Trino?
  • Are all founder/employee/Varada IP assignments complete?
Material IP — patents, trademarks, copyrights, licenses
assetjurisdiction or projectpublic statussourcerisk or request
STARBURST word markUnited States trademarkSerial 87706659; registration 5608477; continued use and incontestability accepted per mirrorTrademarkElite/USPTO mirrorConfirm official USPTO status and assignment chain.
Trino / PrestoSQL open-source lineageTrino projectTrino is the new name for PrestoSQL; distributed SQL engineTrino docs/blogReview open-source licenses, trademark rights, contributor agreements and separation from Starburst proprietary IP.
Varada technology / patented indexing technologyAcquired technologyStarburst announced acquisition of Varada and proprietary/patented indexing technologyVarada acquisition releaseObtain purchase agreement, IP assignments, patent list and Israel employment/IP documentation.
Starburst patents beyond trademarkUSPTO/Google Patents searchNo definitive Starburst Data patent list verified in this runPublic search limitationRun official patent counsel search and freedom-to-operate review.
Legal, IP and compliance timeline Timeline of public legal, IP, regulatory and compliance artifacts.

VIII.E Insurance coverage and material exposures

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Insurance schedules and claims history are not public; cyber/E&O/D&O coverage is a high-priority private request given data-platform/security exposure.

Evidence gaps

  • Cyber, E&O, D&O, EPLI, general liability policies, claims history and broker coverage adequacy memo.

Hidden risks

  • Coverage exclusions for data incidents, open-source claims or contractual indemnities could be material.

Follow-up questions

  • What are coverage limits, exclusions and claims history?
  • Do customer contracts require specific insurance or indemnity levels?

VIII.F Material contracts

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Material customer, cloud, marketplace, partner, employment, IP and acquisition contracts are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Top customer MSAs, cloud/marketplace agreements, partner/reseller agreements, Varada purchase agreement, employment/IP agreements and lease/vendor contracts.

Hidden risks

  • Hidden indemnities, SLA credits, termination rights, MFNs, exclusivity or marketplace fees may materially affect economics.

Follow-up questions

  • Which contracts contain unusual indemnities, exclusivity, termination-for-convenience or price protections?
Material contracts, insurance and exposure checklist
itempublic evidenceverification statusdiligence request
Customer contracts / MSAs / DPAsNamed customers public, contract terms private.not_publicly_verifiableTop customer contracts, DPAs, SLAs, renewal terms, indemnities and termination rights.
Cloud/provider/marketplace agreementsAWS/Azure/GCP marketplace availability public, terms private.not_publicly_verifiableMarketplace agreements, cloud committed spend, credits, reseller terms and COGS schedules.
Cyber/E&O/D&O insuranceNo insurance schedule public.not_publicly_verifiableInsurance binders, claims history, exclusions and coverage adequacy.
Employment/IP assignment contractsLeadership and acquisition public; employment/IP terms private.not_publicly_verifiableEmployee inventions agreements, Varada IP assignments, executive agreements and contractor agreements.

VIII.G Regulatory agency problems

inconclusive confidence: medium

Public regulatory/compliance surface includes SEC Form D, Trust Center and Privacy Policy; no enforcement history was verified publicly.

Evidence gaps

  • Privacy/regulatory counsel memo, incident log, regulator correspondence, SOC reports, pentests, DPAs and subprocessor agreements.

Hidden risks

  • Privacy/security obligations are material for a data platform; undisclosed incidents or audit exceptions could affect customers and valuation.

Follow-up questions

  • Have there been any data incidents, regulator inquiries or material audit exceptions?
  • What privacy laws and data-transfer regimes apply by geography?
Regulatory / agency actions and compliance surface
agency or areaaction or artifactdate or periodstatusdiligence caveat
SECForm D exempt offering notice2022-03-30FiledDoes not disclose public-company status, cap table or investor terms.
Security/complianceTrust Center with security certifications/compliance documents; SOC 2 Type 2 resource listed2025/2026 resources visiblePublic portal / access-gated reportsObtain complete reports, exceptions and remediation evidence.
PrivacyPrivacy Policycurrent public policyPublishedValidate GDPR/CCPA processes, DPAs, subprocessors and incidents.
Regulatory enforcementNo public enforcement action verifiednot_publicly_verifiableCounsel should run enforcement, sanctions and privacy-regulator searches.
Full risk-register heatmap Heatmap of top diligence risks by severity and likelihood.

Evidence

Evidence claims
IDClaimStatusSources
EC-001 CB Insights lists Starburst as a United States/Boston Enterprise Tech unicorn valued at $3.35B with date joined 1/6/2021. verified high SRC-001
EC-002 Starburst's public website is active and markets an enterprise intelligence/data platform. verified high SRC-002
EC-003 Starburst announced a $250M Series D at a $3.35B valuation and $414M total financing to date. verified high SRC-003
EC-004 Starburst announced a $100M Series C at a $1.2B valuation led by Andreessen Horowitz. verified high SRC-004
EC-005 Starburst publicly announced a $42M Series B after its earlier Series A. verified medium SRC-005
EC-006 Starburst publicly announced a $22M Series A led by Index Ventures in November 2019. partially verified medium SRC-006
EC-007 SEC Form D records Starburst Data, Inc. sold approximately $249,999,942 in a 2022 exempt offering. verified high SRC-007
EC-008 Starburst markets itself as founded by Trino's creators and operating across 60+ countries. partially verified medium SRC-002SRC-008
EC-009 Starburst's public leadership page identifies Justin Borgman as Founder & CEO and Martin Traverso as CTO/co-founder. verified high SRC-008
EC-010 Starburst Galaxy is publicly positioned as a fully managed enterprise intelligence platform running in the cloud on AWS, GCP and Azure. verified high SRC-009
EC-011 Starburst Enterprise is publicly positioned as a self-managed enterprise-grade distribution of open-source Trino across hybrid and cloud deployments. verified high SRC-010
EC-012 Starburst Icehouse is publicly positioned as Iceberg + Trino for open lakehouse adoption. verified medium SRC-011
EC-013 Starburst documentation describes connectors and clients that allow SQL access to many data sources. verified high SRC-012SRC-013SRC-023
EC-014 Starburst documentation describes built-in role-based access control and security features. verified medium SRC-014
EC-015 Starburst has product-led and sales-led public CTAs but does not publish transparent enterprise pricing in accessible public materials. partially verified medium SRC-009SRC-015
EC-016 Public company and wire-service materials list enterprise customers including Comcast, DoorDash, FINRA, Priceline, VMware, Conde Nast and Zalando. partially verified medium SRC-002SRC-004SRC-016SRC-017
EC-017 A public FINRA case study says FINRA used Starburst Enterprise on AWS/S3 for a 25PB environment and about 100B new rows per day. partially verified medium SRC-018
EC-018 Starburst documents public AWS, Azure and Google Cloud marketplace procurement/deployment channels. verified high SRC-019SRC-020SRC-021
EC-019 Starburst publicly markets a Dell data analytics/lakehouse solution powered by Starburst. partially verified medium SRC-022
EC-020 Starburst integrates with Tableau and standard BI/SQL client workflows. verified medium SRC-023SRC-013
EC-021 Trino is an open-source distributed SQL query engine for querying large data sets across heterogeneous sources. verified high SRC-024
EC-022 The Trino project states PrestoSQL was rebranded as Trino. verified high SRC-025
EC-023 Amazon Athena directly overlaps with Starburst's SQL-on-data-lake value proposition. verified high SRC-028
EC-024 Databricks and Dremio publicly position lakehouse platforms that compete for similar analytics budgets. verified medium SRC-026SRC-027
EC-025 Starburst's open roles page showed public hiring across engineering, product, sales, support, marketing and services. verified medium SRC-029
EC-026 Starburst publicly promotes a remote-work culture and diversity/inclusion efforts. verified medium SRC-030
EC-027 Starburst maintains a public Trust Center with security certifications, compliance documents and key policies. partially verified medium SRC-033
EC-028 Starburst publishes a privacy policy covering personal data collection, use and safeguards. verified medium SRC-034
EC-029 CourtListener indexes one case, STARBURST DATA, INC. v. HEWITT, filed in M.D.N.C. on March 18, 2025. partially verified medium SRC-031
EC-030 TrademarkElite mirrors a USPTO record for the STARBURST mark owned by Starburst Data, Inc., serial 87706659, registration 5608477. partially verified medium SRC-032
EC-031 Starburst announced acquisition of Varada, including patented indexing technology and engineering/product leadership joining Starburst. verified medium SRC-035
EC-032 Accessible SEC submissions data for Starburst Data, Inc. showed a Form D but no public S-1 filing in this run. partially verified medium SRC-007SRC-038
EC-033 Audited financial statements, revenue, ARR bridge, gross margin, burn, cash, debt and forecasts were not publicly verifiable. not publicly verifiable high SRC-003SRC-004SRC-037
EC-034 Customer concentration, churn, NRR/GRR, renewal status and contract economics are not publicly verifiable. not publicly verifiable high SRC-016SRC-017SRC-018SRC-037
EC-035 Capital structure, ownership percentages, option pool, debt, preferences and off-balance-sheet liabilities are not publicly verifiable. not publicly verifiable high SRC-003SRC-004SRC-007SRC-037
EC-036 Product roadmap maturity, product-level gross margin, support load and benchmark claims are not publicly verifiable. not publicly verifiable medium SRC-009SRC-010SRC-011SRC-037
EC-037 Current public pipeline positioning includes Icehouse, data products/context layer and AIDA, while open roles include Trino engine and security work. partially verified medium SRC-002SRC-011SRC-029
EC-038 Exact headcount and turnover were not publicly verified, but public snippets and open roles show a sizable hiring surface. inconclusive low SRC-029SRC-036
EC-039 No public top-supplier purchase concentration or supplier contracts were found; key dependencies are inferred from product architecture and cloud marketplace materials. not publicly verifiable medium SRC-009SRC-010SRC-018SRC-019SRC-020SRC-021SRC-037
EC-040 Insurance coverage, material contracts, employment agreements, IP assignments and regulatory correspondence were not publicly verifiable. not publicly verifiable high SRC-031SRC-033SRC-034SRC-037
Sources
IDPublisherTitleAccessed
SRC-001 CB Insights The Complete List Of Unicorn Companies 2026-05-30
SRC-002 Starburst Enterprise Intelligence Platform | Starburst 2026-05-30
SRC-003 Starburst Starburst Raises $250 Million to Lead the Market Shift to Faster Analytics on Decentralized Data 2026-05-30
SRC-004 Starburst Starburst Secures $100M Series C Financing To Turn Data Analytics On Its Head, Led By Andreessen Horowitz 2026-05-30
SRC-005 Starburst Starburst Announces $42 Million Series B 2026-05-30
SRC-006 Starburst Starburst Raises $22M To Enable Enterprises To Analyze Anything, Anywhere 2026-05-30
SRC-007 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission SEC Form D: Starburst Data, Inc. 2026-05-30
SRC-008 Starburst About | Starburst 2026-05-30
SRC-009 Starburst Starburst Galaxy | Starburst 2026-05-30
SRC-010 Starburst Starburst Enterprise | Starburst 2026-05-30
SRC-011 Starburst Starburst Icehouse Architecture | Starburst 2026-05-30
SRC-012 Starburst Docs Connector overview — Starburst Enterprise 2026-05-30
SRC-013 Starburst Docs Clients — Starburst Enterprise 2026-05-30
SRC-014 Starburst Docs Security — Starburst Enterprise 2026-05-30
SRC-015 Starburst Plans and Pricing | Starburst 2026-05-30
SRC-016 Starburst Customers | Starburst 2026-05-30
SRC-017 PR Newswire Starburst Unveils Inaugural Data Rebel and Partner Award Winners at Datanova Conference 2026-05-30
SRC-018 CaseStudies.com / FeaturedCustomers Case Study: FINRA achieves faster, scalable analytics on 25PB of data with Starburst Enterprise 2026-05-30
SRC-019 Starburst Docs Starburst Enterprise in AWS Marketplace 2026-05-30
SRC-020 Starburst Docs Get Starburst in Azure Marketplace 2026-05-30
SRC-021 Starburst Docs Starburst Enterprise in Google Cloud Marketplace 2026-05-30
SRC-022 Starburst / Dell solution page Dell Data Analytics Engine, AI and Analytics | Starburst 2026-05-30
SRC-023 Starburst Docs Starburst - Tableau Desktop 2026-05-30
SRC-024 Trino project Overview — Trino documentation 2026-05-30
SRC-025 Trino project We're rebranding PrestoSQL as Trino 2026-05-30
SRC-026 Databricks Data Lakehouse Architecture | Databricks 2026-05-30
SRC-027 Dremio Dremio | The Agentic Lakehouse 2026-05-30
SRC-028 Amazon Web Services What is Amazon Athena? 2026-05-30
SRC-029 Starburst Open Roles | Starburst 2026-05-30
SRC-030 Starburst Careers | Starburst 2026-05-30
SRC-031 CourtListener / Free Law Project CourtListener search results for "Starburst Data" 2026-05-30
SRC-032 TrademarkElite STARBURST Trademark (USPTO Serial 87706659) – Starburst Data, Inc. 2026-05-30
SRC-033 Starburst Trust Center Trust Center - starburstdata.com 2026-05-30
SRC-034 Starburst Privacy Policy | Starburst 2026-05-30
SRC-035 Starburst Starburst Acquires Varada To Deliver The New Standard Of Data Lake Analytics 2026-05-30
SRC-036 DuckDuckGo DuckDuckGo search result for Starburst LinkedIn/Forbes headcount anchors 2026-05-30
SRC-037 User-provided workflow request User request and absence of data-room materials 2026-05-30
SRC-038 DuckDuckGo DuckDuckGo search results for Starburst IPO/acquired/shutdown checks 2026-05-30

Disclaimer

This report is a public-evidence diligence snapshot, not investment advice. Important financial, legal, technical, and contractual facts remain non-public and should be verified directly with management and primary documents before any investment decision.