Startup Diligence
Diligence report Enterprise technology: AI-powered identity verification, KYC/KYB/AML, biometrics, deepfake detection and fraud prevention Private unicorn / Series B growth-stage enterprise technology company

Incode Technologies

Incode Technologies Startup Diligence Report

Incode may benefit from durable demand for AI-era identity verification, deepfake defense and KYC/AML, but valuation support depends on proving paid usage, retention, gross margin, model performance and compliant data rights.

Company profile

Incode Technologies Startup Diligence Report

Eligible private-unicorn target with strong public evidence of active operations, broad IDV product surface, enterprise references, security/privacy positioning and continued hiring. Financial, customer, cap-table, legal/IP and control evidence remains high-gap.

Website
www.incode.com
Sector
Enterprise technology: AI-powered identity verification, KYC/KYB/AML, biometrics, deepfake detection and fraud prevention
Geography
United States / San Francisco listing with public offices and operations across North America, Latin America, Europe, Serbia, Israel and the UK
Stage
Private unicorn / Series B growth-stage enterprise technology company
Known aliases
Incode, Incode Technologies, Inc., Incode Omni
Report version
1.0
Timezone
UTC

Executive summary

Strengths

  • $1.25B unicorn status is corroborated by supplied CB row and company timeline.
  • Public product/docs show active multi-module identity platform.
  • About/careers/Greenhouse show global founder-led organization and active hiring.

Risks

  • No public financial statements, ARR, margins, burn or debt.
  • Biometric/privacy regulation and cross-border data exposure.
  • Crowded IDV/KYC market may pressure pricing and differentiation.

Gaps

  • Audited financials, ARR bridge, gross margin and cash runway
  • Cap table, investor rights and acquisition consideration
  • Customer concentration, contracts and renewal/churn data
  • Independent model benchmarks and security/privacy reports
  • Comprehensive litigation/IP/regulatory search

Recommended next steps

  • Open finance/cap-table data-room review before valuation reliance
  • Run customer-reference and top-account concentration diligence
  • Obtain security/privacy reports and model-validation artifacts
  • Commission legal/IP/regulatory search covering biometric privacy and M&A liabilities

Risk register

high high likelihood

R-001: Financial opacity and quality-of-revenue risk

No public audited financials, ARR, gross margin, burn, debt or cash runway.

Diligence request: Obtain audited financials, management accounts, ARR bridge, QoE, cash/debt and sales productivity metrics.

high medium likelihood

R-002: Valuation durability and preference-stack risk

$1.25B valuation is a 2021 anchor; current mark, preferences and financing needs unknown.

Diligence request: Request cap table, financing docs, 409A history, investor rights and financing plan.

high medium likelihood

R-005: Biometric privacy and regulated-industry exposure

Biometric processing and regulated-sector sales create enforcement/class-action risk.

Diligence request: Obtain DPIAs, consent/deletion proof, regulator correspondence and privacy counsel assessment.

high medium likelihood

R-009: Security/compliance evidence scope risk

Trust Center lists certifications but reports/scope/exceptions are gated.

Diligence request: Review SOC/ISO/FedRAMP reports, pentests, remediations and subprocessors.

high unknown likelihood

R-003: Customer concentration and renewal risk

Public logos do not disclose revenue weights, renewal status, NRR or churn.

Diligence request: Request top-customer revenue, cohort retention, contracts and reference calls.

medium high likelihood

R-004: Crowded IDV/KYC market and pricing pressure

Multiple overlapping competitors in IDV, biometrics and fraud protection.

Diligence request: Review win/loss, pricing, competitor benchmarks and churn displacement.

medium high likelihood

R-006: AI/deepfake technical arms race

Differentiation depends on proprietary AI/deepfake performance against evolving attacks.

Diligence request: Request independent benchmarks, model governance and red-team results.

medium high likelihood

R-010: International operations and data-transfer complexity

Offices/customers/data processing span many countries with privacy, employment and tax obligations.

Diligence request: Request transfer-impact assessments, local counsel memos and payroll/tax compliance.

Chapter 01

01Financial Information

Funding/valuation anchors are public; operating financials, cap table and forecasts are private.

I.A Annual and quarterly financial information for the past three years

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

No audited financials, management reports, backlog or AR aging are public; scale metrics are proxies only.

Evidence gaps

  • Financial statements, revenue detail, backlog and AR aging missing.

Hidden risks

  • Usage metrics may mask low monetization or concentration.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide audited financials, management accounts, ARR bridge, backlog and AR aging.
Revenue / ARR / unit-economic signals
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Trust checks4.1B+ trust checks in 2024partially_verifiedPaid vs free/test reconciliation
Document verifications340M+ document verificationspartially_verifiedPaid volume and margin
ARR/revenue/runwayNot disclosednot_publicly_verifiableARR bridge, GAAP revenue, cash/debt
Organic growth80% y/y organic growth claimpartially_verifiedBaseline and bridge

I.B Financial Projections

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Public materials show growth/M&A claims but no forecasts or assumptions.

Evidence gaps

  • Three-year forecast, capex, working capital and financing assumptions missing.

Hidden risks

  • Forecasts may depend on M&A, pilots or long enterprise cycles.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide board-approved model, pipeline, cohort retention and downside cases.

I.C Capital Structure

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Series B private status and M&A activity are visible; ownership and debt are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Cap table, options, warrants, debt and M&A terms not public.

Hidden risks

  • Hidden preferences, debt or earnouts could affect economics.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide cap table, financing docs, option plan, debt and M&A agreements.
Capital structure / ownership snapshot
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Founders/commonFounder/CEO public; ownership not publicpartially_verifiedFounder equity and vesting
Series B investorsTask row lists Dila Capital, Framework Ventures, 3L; full stack unknownpartially_verifiedInvestor rights/preferences
Options/debtNo public schedulenot_publicly_verifiableOption ledger, debt and liabilities
StatusSeries B | Alive; no SEC ticker exact matchpartially_verifiedCounsel status confirmation

I.D Other financial information

partially verified confidence: medium

Financing history is partly visible; tax/accounting policies are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Tax/NOL, accounting memos and round-by-round ownership missing.

Hidden risks

  • No tax, revenue-recognition or current-basis detail.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide tax schedules, accounting policies and financing history.
Public funding-round history
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
2015 foundingFounded by Ricardo Amper in San FranciscoverifiedIncorporation and founder stock records
2021 Series B/unicorn$220M last raised and $1.25B valuation anchorpartially_verifiedFull round docs and investor allocation
M&A expansionAuthenticID and MetaMap acquisition signalspartially_verifiedPurchase terms and integration budget
Financing and M&A timeline Founding, Series B/unicorn and acquisition signals.
Funding and valuation anchors Bar chart of funding and valuation anchors.
Chapter 02

02Products

Incode markets broad AI identity products; pricing and unit economics remain opaque.

II.A Description of each product

partially verified confidence: medium

Public pages support orchestration, IDV, biometrics, deepfake detection, workforce and developer integrations; SKU economics are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • SKU revenue, pricing, model reports, roadmap and margin missing.

Hidden risks

  • Performance and dependency quality may vary by jurisdiction.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide product P&L, price book, roadmap, model governance and customer metrics.
Product / SKU matrix
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Orchestration PlatformDashboard, workflows, analytics, case managementverifiedUsage/uptime
Identity VerificationDocument, face, liveness, OCR, age and AI checkspartially_verifiedBenchmarks/product P&L
DeepsightBehavior/device/camera/perception deepfake layerspartially_verifiedIndependent benchmark
APIs/SDKs/WorkforceDeveloper docs and featured product navigationverifiedAPI adoption/support burden
Pricing comparison / packaging evidence
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
List priceNo sampled public pricing; demo CTAsnot_publicly_verifiablePrice book/discount waterfall
Partner pricingPreferred partner-tier pricing mentionedverifiedChannel margin/deal protection
Competitor priceNot collected publiclynot_publicly_verifiableRFP/win-loss pricing
Product evidence / roadmap signals
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Docs breadthOnboarding, modules, consent, government sources, SDKsverifiedAPI uptime/developer satisfaction
Workflow/case managementNo-code flows and case reviewverifiedManual-review productivity
AI/deepfake roadmapDeepsight/Risk AI/Agentic Identity positioningpartially_verifiedRoadmap/adoption
AuthenticID integrationAcquisition announcementpartially_verifiedMigration KPIs
Public product architecture map Map platform, modules, APIs and dependencies.
Chapter 03

03Customer Information

Customer and partner logos are public; concentration, churn, renewal and supplier spend are private.

III.A Top customers by application

partially verified confidence: medium

Enterprise references are visible but top-15 customer spend by application is not.

Evidence gaps

  • Top customer list and YTD revenue by application missing.

Hidden risks

  • Logo pages can overstate customer depth.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide top-15 customer schedule, contracts and reference calls.
Public customers and case studies
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
ExperianAscend Platform integration testimonialpartially_verifiedContract scope/ARR
CitiAccount-opening testimonialpartially_verifiedProduction volume/renewal
EquifaxDigital Solutions partnership testimonialpartially_verifiedIntegration terms
Rappi/Rappibank, Banco Dondé, KlarLATAM banking/digital onboarding testimonialspartially_verifiedCurrent ARR/status

III.B Strategic relationships

partially verified confidence: medium

Partner directory lists resellers, SIs, OEM/MSP partners and integrations; revenue contribution unknown.

Evidence gaps

  • Partner revenue, pipeline and agreements not public.

Hidden risks

  • Partner listings may not equal material revenue.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide partner contracts, sourced ARR, reseller margin and pipeline.
Strategic relationships and partnerships
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
CarahsoftPublic-sector channel quotepartially_verifiedContract/pipeline
NTT Data/Optiv/SHI/Guidepoint/Tec360/AheadChannel/SI partnerspartially_verifiedSourced ARR/deals
Temenos/HubSpot/Zendesk/FreshservicePlatform integrationspartially_verifiedAdoption/support cost
Digital Check/Verifone/CastlesHardware integrationspartially_verifiedCertification/dependency terms

III.C Revenue by customer

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

No public customer revenue percentages.

Evidence gaps

  • Revenue by customer, NRR/GRR and churn missing.

Hidden risks

  • Large banks/governments could drive concentration.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide customer concentration, NRR/GRR and renewal pipeline.
Customer revenue concentration matrix
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Top customerNot publicly identifiednot_publicly_verifiableARR/margin/term
Bank/fintech referencesCiti, Rappi/Rappibank, Banco Dondé, Klarpartially_verifiedRevenue by logo
Enterprise/data partnersExperian/Equifax testimonialspartially_verifiedPartner vs customer split
Government/public sectorCarahsoft/government signalspartially_verifiedAward status/compliance
Customer/partner disclosed revenue concentration Null bar chart for concentration gaps.

III.D Significant relationships severed within the last two years

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No public severed-relationship evidence found; absence is not assurance.

Evidence gaps

  • Churned relationships and terminations private.

Hidden risks

  • Lost regulated customers may not be announced.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide churn, loss reviews and termination notices.

III.E Top suppliers

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Integrations and government sources are public; supplier spend/cloud/SLAs are not.

Evidence gaps

  • Vendor list, spend, SLAs and DPAs missing.

Hidden risks

  • Government/cloud/subprocessor dependencies could affect availability/compliance.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide vendor spend, subprocessors, government agreements and SLAs.
Supplier / infrastructure dependency matrix
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Cloud infrastructureVendor not disclosednot_publicly_verifiableCloud spend/SLAs/DR
Government SoR checksDocs list government sourcesverifiedContracts/costs/fallback logic
Subprocessors/data vendorsTrust Center references gated subprocessorsnot_publicly_verifiableSubprocessor list/DPAs
Acquired platformsAuthenticID/MetaMap signalspartially_verifiedNovations/integration plan
Chapter 04

04Competition

Crowded IDV/KYC/biometrics market; win rates, pricing and share private.

IV.A Competitive landscape by market segment

partially verified confidence: medium

CB lists multiple IDV/biometric competitors; Incode differentiates on AI scale, orchestration and trust claims.

Evidence gaps

  • Market share, win/loss, pricing and benchmarks missing.

Hidden risks

  • IDV checks may commoditize and pressure price.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide win/loss, analyst reports, benchmarks and pricing comparisons.
Competitor comparison matrix
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
IDVerseAI IDV/fraud protection SaaSverifiedFunding/pricing/win-loss
VeriffAI-driven verification for fraud/KYCverifiedBenchmarks/pricing
InnovatricsBiometric/facial/fingerprint recognitionverifiedVertical overlap
ID.me / IDMission / FRS LabsDigital identity, biometrics, onboarding/authverifiedFunding/customer overlap
Basis-of-competition scoring
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
AI/deepfakeDeepsight and 35+ AI model claimspartially_verifiedIndependent benchmarks
Data scale4.1B+ checks and 400M profilespartially_verifiedAudited paid usage
Enterprise complianceTrust Center certificationspartially_verifiedReports/scope/exceptions
Distribution/pricePartner directory plus quote-led pricingpartially_verifiedPartner ARR/price waterfall
Market and regulatory force table
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
AI fraud/deepfakesDeepsight page emphasizes threatverifiedDemand and benchmarks
Biometric/privacy regulationPrivacy policy has biometric/Illinois/CCPA/GDPR sectionsverifiedDPIAs/compliance evidence
Enterprise security requirementsTrust Center certificationspartially_verifiedCurrent reports
Partner/channel conflictBroad partner ecosystempartially_verifiedMargins/exclusivity
IDV competitive market map Qualitative map of competitors.
Chapter 05

05Marketing, Sales, and Distribution

GTM uses direct enterprise sales, partners, integrations and content; productivity/private CAC unavailable.

V.A Strategy and implementation

partially verified confidence: medium

Public evidence shows verticalized enterprise positioning and partner/content channels.

Evidence gaps

  • Marketing budget, attribution and ROI not public.

Hidden risks

  • Vertical breadth increases regulatory complexity.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide GTM plan, source mix, partner ARR and CAC/payback.
Distribution channels and GTM motions
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Direct enterprise demoDemo CTAs and vertical pagesverifiedConversion/sales cycle
Channel partners/resellers/SIsPartner directory/Carahsoftpartially_verifiedPartner ARR
Platform integrationsTemenos, HubSpot, Zendesk, hardwarepartially_verifiedAdoption/support cost
M&A expansionAuthenticID and MetaMap signalspartially_verifiedCross-sell/retention
Public marketing signal summary
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Customer testimonialsExperian, Citi, Equifax and LATAM banking quotespartially_verifiedReference calls/contracts
Analyst/review positioningGartner/Liminal/G2 claimspartially_verifiedFull reports/methodology
Trust marketingTrust Center visiblepartially_verifiedReports/exceptions
AI/deepfake contentDeepsight messagingpartially_verifiedCampaign performance
Enterprise GTM funnel Funnel with public motions and missing metrics.

V.B Major Customers

partially verified confidence: medium

Named testimonials show credibility but not account status or pipeline.

Evidence gaps

  • Account plans and expansion pipeline private.

Hidden risks

  • Major accounts may concentrate pipeline/resources.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide account plans and renewal forecast.

V.C Principal avenues for generating new business

partially verified confidence: medium

Avenues include demo requests, partner co-sell, integrations and content/analyst signals.

Evidence gaps

  • Inbound conversion, outbound productivity and channel mix missing.

Hidden risks

  • Enterprise sales may be long and costly.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide funnel metrics, source mix and sales cycle.

V.D Sales force productivity model

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Sales roles are public; quotas, ramp and cycles are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Sales compensation, quota, cycle and new-hire plan missing.

Hidden risks

  • Scaling sales before productivity proof could reduce runway.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide quota attainment, ramp, CAC/payback and hiring plan.
Sales force productivity model gaps
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Quota/attainmentNot disclosed; sales hiring publicnot_publicly_verifiableQuota/ramp by cohort
Sales cycle/CACNot disclosednot_publicly_verifiableCycle/CAC/payback/spend
Channel productivityPartner directory onlypartially_verifiedPartner pipeline/margin
Pricing/discountingQuote-led/no public pricenot_publicly_verifiablePrice book/win-loss

V.E Ability to implement marketing plan with current and projected budgets

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Budget sufficiency cannot be assessed from public sources.

Evidence gaps

  • Marketing budget, runway and hiring budget private.

Hidden risks

  • Inefficient CAC could force financing.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide operating plan, marketing budget and runway analysis.
Chapter 06

06Research and Development

R&D evidence centers on AI/ML, IDV, deepfake detection, government sources and integrations; budget/model governance private.

VI.A Description of R&D organization

partially verified confidence: medium

Leadership and jobs show CTO/Head of AI plus engineering, ML, data, DevOps and QA hiring.

Evidence gaps

  • R&D spend, model governance, incidents and technical debt private.

Hidden risks

  • Fraud/AI vectors can outpace R&D.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide R&D org chart, roadmap, governance, QA and incidents.
Key R&D personnel and notable hires
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Jovan JovanovicChief Technology OfficerverifiedEmployment agreement/references
Alex GolunovHead of AIverifiedModel governance ownership
Roman KarachinskyChief Product OfficerverifiedRoadmap ownership
Open R&D rolesBackend, DevOps, Staff, ML, Data, QA rolesverifiedHiring plan/attrition
Technical dependency and control matrix
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Model data/profiles400M profiles and 4.1B+ checks claimedpartially_verifiedData provenance/model cards/bias tests
Government SoR checksDocs list countriesverifiedContracts/fallback logic
Security controlsTrust Center certificationspartially_verifiedReports/remediation tracker
Acquired platformsAuthenticID/MetaMap signalspartially_verifiedTechnical DD/migration plan
R&D portfolio and dependency map Map AI, IDV, controls and dependencies.

VI.B New Product Pipeline

partially verified confidence: medium

Deepsight/Risk AI/Agentic Identity/Workforce and AuthenticID integration are public signals; costs/adoption unknown.

Evidence gaps

  • Project status, development cost, dependencies and adoption missing.

Hidden risks

  • Integration or model shortcomings could slow roadmap.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide roadmap, R&D budget, integration plan and beta feedback.
Public product / research pipeline
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
DeepsightProduct page/benchmark claimspartially_verifiedFalse-positive/negative cohorts
Risk AI Agent / Agentic IdentityFeatured navigationpartially_verifiedRoadmap/adoption
Government verification sourcesDocs list countriesverifiedContracts/coverage
AuthenticID integrationAcquisition announcementpartially_verifiedIntegration milestones
Chapter 07

07Management and Personnel

Public evidence verifies founder-led leadership, 600+ Incoders and active hiring; comp, equity, turnover and HR issues private.

VII.A Organization Chart

partially verified confidence: medium

Public org chart can be approximated from executive roles; formal lines and board oversight private.

Evidence gaps

  • Formal org chart, board committees and succession plan missing.

Hidden risks

  • Founder/key-person dependence and succession risk.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide org chart, board materials and executive agreements.
Public leadership org chart Public executive roster.

Reporting lines inferred from executive hierarchy.

VII.B Historical and projected headcount by function and location

partially verified confidence: medium

Company claims 600+ Incoders and 15 fetched open roles across functions/locations.

Evidence gaps

  • Historical headcount, attrition and forecasts private.

Hidden risks

  • Multi-country hiring increases payroll/tax/compliance complexity.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide HRIS export, plan, recruiting funnel and attrition.
Headcount and hiring signals
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Global team600+ Incoders, 25+ nationalitiespartially_verifiedHRIS export
OfficesNew York, Belgrade, Mexico City, Madrid, London, Tel Aviv, BarcelonaverifiedPayroll/tax entity map
R&D hiringBackend, DevOps, Staff, ML, Data, QA rolesverifiedHiring plan/attrition
Sales/G&A hiringAE, Account Manager, SLED AE, Total RewardsverifiedSales capacity model
Headcount and hiring public trend Bar chart of workforce signals.

VII.C Senior management biographies

partially verified confidence: medium

Senior management names/roles are public; details and background checks private.

Evidence gaps

  • Detailed bios, references, background checks and equity ownership private.

Hidden risks

  • Public bios may omit disputes or covenants.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide bios, references, agreements and equity holdings.
Senior management roster
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Ricardo AmperFounder & CEO; founded June 17, 2015verifiedEquity/agreement/references
Jovan Jovanovic / Alex Golunov / Roman KarachinskyCTO / Head of AI / CPOverifiedDetailed bios/retention
Jesse Franklin / Marianna AmperCFO / SVP Strategic FinanceverifiedFinance controls/related-party review
Jose Baltazar / Iñigo Castillo / Diego CreelBusiness operations and regional headsverifiedRegional P&L/employment terms

VII.D Compensation arrangements

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

No public executive compensation, benefits or severance terms.

Evidence gaps

  • Employment agreements, comp plans and benefits costs missing.

Hidden risks

  • Change-of-control payments can affect economics.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide compensation summary and benefits docs.

VII.E Incentive stock plans

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

No public option plan, grant schedule or 409A materials.

Evidence gaps

  • Stock plan and grant ledger private.

Hidden risks

  • Option pool and retention grants can dilute investors.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide stock plan, grant ledger, vesting and 409A history.

VII.F Significant employee relations problems, past or present

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No public employee-relations dispute evidence; absence not proof.

Evidence gaps

  • HR complaints, settlements and regulator correspondence private.

Hidden risks

  • Employment issues can remain non-public.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide HR/legal matters summary and complaint logs.

VII.G Personnel Turnover

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Turnover data is not public; hiring may reflect growth or backfills.

Evidence gaps

  • Turnover, regretted attrition and retention data missing.

Hidden risks

  • High R&D/sales attrition could impair execution.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide 24-month attrition, exit themes and retention grants.
Departures / turnover signal table
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Executive departuresNo departure list in sampled sourcesnot_publicly_verifiableDeparture history
Functional attritionOpen roles onlynot_publicly_verifiable24-month attrition by function/location
Employee relationsCulture statements onlynot_publicly_verifiableComplaint/settlement summary
Chapter 08

08Legal and Related Matters

Privacy/security posture is public; comprehensive litigation, IP, insurance, contracts and regulatory review requires counsel/data room.

VIII.A Pending lawsuits against the Company

inconclusive confidence: low

No obvious pending lawsuits in broad search screens; no comprehensive docket search.

Evidence gaps

  • PACER/state/international docket results and counsel summary missing.

Hidden risks

  • Biometric, AI, employment or contract disputes could exist outside indexed search.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide litigation docket, demand letters and counsel letter.
Pending lawsuits against company public-screen table
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Broad lawsuit searchNo obvious pending lawsuit in top fetched resultsinconclusivePACER/state/international docket search
Biometric/BIPA exposurePrivacy policy confirms biometric processing/Illinois sectionrisk_area_no_case_verifiedPrivacy counsel memo/complaint history
Comprehensive docket reviewNot performed publiclynot_publicly_verifiableCounsel response letter
Legal, privacy and regulatory timeline Timeline of compliance/legal signals.

VIII.B Pending lawsuits initiated by Company

inconclusive confidence: low

No public company-initiated litigation identified in sampled sources.

Evidence gaps

  • Affirmative claims and arbitration private.

Hidden risks

  • IP enforcement or collections may not appear in broad search.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide schedule of claims and counsel memo.
Pending lawsuits initiated by company screen
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Company-initiated casesNo visible top-result initiated litigationinconclusiveCounsel schedule of claims
IP enforcement/trade secretsNo exact patent result; enforcement not searched comprehensivelynot_publicly_verifiableIP litigation/demand letters
Collections/customer disputesNot publicnot_publicly_verifiableAR disputes/arbitration

VIII.C Environmental and employee safety issues and liabilities

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Software/identity operations suggest low environmental exposure; workplace matters private.

Evidence gaps

  • EHS policies, workers comp and incident logs private.

Hidden risks

  • Global offices create local compliance issues.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide EHS/workplace incident summary.

VIII.D Material patents, copyrights, licenses, and trademarks

inconclusive confidence: low

Exact patent search inconclusive; trademarks/copyrights not exhaustive.

Evidence gaps

  • IP schedule, OSS/SBOM, AI training-data rights and assignments missing.

Hidden risks

  • Model IP/training data rights or acquired IP chain may be weak.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide IP schedule, assignments, OSS/SBOM and acquisition IP records.
Material IP, certifications and regulatory obligations
itempublic evidencestatusdiligence request
Proprietary AI/ML models35+ AI models claimedpartially_verifiedIP ownership/model cards/data rights
Patents/trademarksExact patent search inconclusive; trademark not exhaustiveinconclusiveFormal IP schedule/search
Security certificationsSOC2/ISO/HIPAA/FedRAMP/ACCS/Kantara listedpartially_verifiedReports/scope/exceptions
Biometric/privacy obligationsPrivacy policy covers biometric/Illinois/CCPA/GDPRverifiedDPIAs/consent/deletion logs
Material contractsPartner/docs pages do not disclose termsnot_publicly_verifiableContract register/DPAs/SLAs/indemnities

VIII.E Insurance coverage and material exposures

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

No public cyber/E&O/D&O/EPLI policy limits or exclusions.

Evidence gaps

  • Insurance policies and claims history missing.

Hidden risks

  • Identity vendors face cyber, privacy and E&O exposure.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide insurance schedule and claims history.

VIII.F Material contracts

not publicly verifiable confidence: high

Material customer, vendor, data, partner and M&A contracts are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Top contracts, DPAs, SLAs, indemnities and M&A agreements missing.

Hidden risks

  • DPAs, SLAs, indemnities and data-source terms may be material.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide contract register and key agreements.

VIII.G Regulatory agency problems

partially verified confidence: medium

Trust Center and Privacy Policy show compliance posture; broad searches found no obvious enforcement, but biometric/privacy risk remains core.

Evidence gaps

  • Regulator correspondence, DPIAs, audits and incident history missing.

Hidden risks

  • Biometric, age-verification, KYC/AML, cross-border and AI rules can create enforcement risk.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide reports, DPIAs, consent records, regulator correspondence and incident logs.
Diligence risk heatmap Heatmap of key risks.

Evidence

Evidence claims
IDClaimStatusSources
EC-001 Incode is a $1.25B private unicorn per supplied CB row and company timeline. verified high SRC-001SRC-002
EC-002 CB profile lists Incode as Founded 2015, Series B | Alive, $257M total raised and $220M last raised. verified medium SRC-013
EC-003 Incode was founded in San Francisco in 2015 and claims 600+ Incoders and 25+ nationalities. verified medium SRC-002
EC-004 Incode markets end-to-end orchestration for KYC, KYB, AML, age verification, cases, analytics and APIs/SDKs. verified medium SRC-004
EC-005 Incode claims proprietary AI/ML, facial recognition, liveness, document verification, OCR, age estimation and 35+ AI models. partially verified medium SRC-005
EC-006 Deepsight is marketed as multi-layer deepfake detection across behavioral, device, camera and perception layers. partially verified medium SRC-006
EC-007 Incode claims 4.1B+ trust checks, 340M+ document verifications, 400M profiles and 99.99% reliability. partially verified medium SRC-003
EC-008 Public testimonials/logos include Experian, Rappi/Rappibank, Banco Dondé, Klar, Citi and Equifax. partially verified medium SRC-003
EC-009 Incode publishes channel, SI, OEM/MSP and platform-integration partners. partially verified medium SRC-012
EC-010 Trust Center lists SOC2, ISO/IEC 27001/30107/42001, HIPAA, FedRAMP Class C, ACCS and Kantara/IAL2 signals. partially verified medium SRC-007
EC-011 Privacy Policy discloses biometric processing, processor role, GDPR/CCPA rights and Illinois biometric retention language. verified medium SRC-008
EC-012 Developer docs show onboarding lifecycle, modules, government verification sources, consent and web/SDK integrations. verified medium SRC-009
EC-013 Greenhouse shows open roles across G&A, R&D, engineering, ML/data, QA and sales in multiple locations. verified medium SRC-011
EC-014 Incode lists senior leaders led by Founder & CEO Ricardo Amper. verified medium SRC-002
EC-015 Incode announced acquiring AuthenticID and claimed 80% organic growth and 4.1B+ checks for the combined company. partially verified medium SRC-014
EC-016 Public signals indicate Incode acquired MetaMap assets/subsidiaries in Brazil and Mexico in 2024. partially verified medium SRC-015SRC-013
EC-017 CB identifies competitors IDVerse, Veriff, Innovatrics, FRS Labs, ID.me and IDMission. verified medium SRC-013
EC-018 SEC ticker-list exact screen found no Incode match. partially verified medium SRC-016
EC-019 Broad legal search screens did not surface obvious Incode lawsuits/regulatory actions in top results. inconclusive low SRC-017
EC-020 Exact Google Patents search did not show visible Incode Technologies patent results in fetched excerpt. inconclusive low SRC-018
EC-021 Audited financials, ARR, concentration, gross margin, runway, debt and cap table are not publicly disclosed. not publicly verifiable high SRC-013
EC-022 Public pricing appears enterprise/demo-led; no sampled public price book was found. partially verified medium SRC-019
EC-023 Incode targets regulated verticals: financial services, healthcare, gaming/gambling, ecommerce, public sector and social media. verified medium SRC-002
EC-024 Supplier spend, top cloud providers, insurance and material contracts are not public. not publicly verifiable high SRC-009
EC-025 Employee turnover, compensation plans, equity plans and employee relations issues are not public. not publicly verifiable high SRC-010
EC-026 No existing reports/*incode*-diligence-report.yaml was present before writing. verified high SRC-001
Sources
IDPublisherTitleAccessed
SRC-001 CB Insights CB Insights unicorn-list row supplied in task 2026-06-04
SRC-002 Incode Incode About page 2026-06-04
SRC-003 Incode Incode Why Incode page 2026-06-04
SRC-004 Incode Incode Platform page 2026-06-04
SRC-005 Incode Incode Identity Verification page 2026-06-04
SRC-006 Incode Incode Deepsight page 2026-06-04
SRC-007 Incode / SafeBase Incode Trust Center 2026-06-04
SRC-008 Incode Incode Privacy Policy 2026-06-04
SRC-009 Incode Incode Developer Hub 2026-06-04
SRC-010 Incode Incode Careers page 2026-06-04
SRC-011 Greenhouse / Incode Incode Greenhouse job board 2026-06-04
SRC-012 Incode Incode Partners & Integrations 2026-06-04
SRC-013 CB Insights CB Insights Incode profile 2026-06-04
SRC-014 Incode Incode AuthenticID acquisition announcement 2026-06-04
SRC-015 The Recursive The Recursive: Incode Technologies Acquires MetaMap 2026-06-04
SRC-016 U.S. SEC SEC company tickers JSON 2026-06-04
SRC-017 Microsoft Bing Bing/Jina Incode lawsuit search 2026-06-04
SRC-018 Google Patents Google Patents exact Incode Technologies search 2026-06-04
SRC-019 Incode Incode sitemap 2026-06-04

Disclaimer

This report is a public-evidence diligence snapshot, not investment advice. Important financial, legal, technical, and contractual facts remain non-public and should be verified directly with management and primary documents before any investment decision.