Startup Diligence
Diligence report Venture builder, metaverse infrastructure, Web3, AI simulation, and immersive digital experiences Late-stage private unicorn / venture builder; CB Insights stage Corporate Minority - II | Alive

Improbable Worlds Limited

Improbable Public-Source Startup Diligence Report

The attractive thesis is a well-capitalized, technically deep UK venture builder with major investors, public partner logos, and optionality in metaverse/Web3/AI ventures. The key diligence test is whether parent-company economics, ownership, recurring revenue, and IP rights justify the stale $3.36B unicorn valuation after FY2024 revenue fell to £10M.

Company profile

Improbable Public-Source Startup Diligence Report

Improbable is an active UK private unicorn by public-screen criteria, but the diligence posture is high-risk/track rather than invest-ready because the business model has pivoted from large operating revenue to a venture-builder model with opaque venture economics, customer concentration, cap table, and legal/IP exposure.

Website
www.improbable.io
Sector
Venture builder, metaverse infrastructure, Web3, AI simulation, and immersive digital experiences
Geography
United Kingdom headquartered; global venture, partner, and cloud footprint
Stage
Late-stage private unicorn / venture builder; CB Insights stage Corporate Minority - II | Alive
Known aliases
Improbable, Improbable.io, MSquared, M², Improbable Ventures, Improbable Capital, Improbable Worlds
Report version
1.0
Timezone
UTC

Executive summary

Strengths

  • Companies House verifies Improbable Worlds Limited as an active private limited company incorporated on 16 May 2012.
  • CB Insights lists Improbable as a $3.36B unicorn and alive/private, supporting private-unicorn eligibility.
  • BBC R&D independently validates use of Improbable’s platform/testbed in a live immersive music trial.
  • Company sources consistently support a venture-builder repositioning, though venture counts require reconciliation.

Risks

  • Reported revenue volatility around the pivot: £78M FY2022, £66M FY2023, £10M FY2024 consolidated revenue.
  • Venture/Web3/metaverse concentration creates monetization, adoption, token-market, and execution risk.
  • Governance and capital structure are complex and private, with founder and SVF PSC signals plus large historical funding.
  • Legal/IP/privacy/Web3 risks remain unresolved without counsel, registry, contract, and security diligence.

Gaps

  • Audited financial statements, management accounts, revenue bridge, and FY2025 YTD financials.
  • Fully diluted cap table, liquidation preferences, investor rights, options/warrants/notes, and debt documents.
  • Venture/product economics: ownership, revenue, gross margin, cash burn, exits, and fair-value marks.
  • Customer contracts and revenue concentration, including MLB/BBC/Yuga/Somnia economics.
  • Technical benchmarks, security audits, IP ownership, OSS obligations, and Web3/token allocation/compliance records.
  • Headcount bridge, attrition, compensation, incentive stock plans, and current org chart.

Recommended next steps

  • Proceed only to structured confirmatory diligence with a full finance/legal/product/customer data room.
  • Reconcile FY2022-FY2024 financials to audited accounts and build a venture-by-venture revenue/cash model.
  • Validate current valuation against investor marks, fair-value work, secondary trades, and venture ownership economics.
  • Run technical/IP/security diligence on MSquared, Somnia, MML/Thanos, cloud dependencies, and patent/OSS ownership.
  • Obtain top-customer contracts/references and verify whether named relationships produce recurring revenue.

Risk register

high high likelihood

R-001: Revenue volatility after pivot

Company-stated revenue changed from £78M FY2022 to £66M FY2023 to £10M FY2024 consolidated revenue, making trend quality and forecastability the top diligence issue.

Diligence request: Request full audited statements, revenue bridge, segment/customer revenue, one-off items, and board-approved forecast.

high high likelihood

R-002: Private operating pack unavailable

Core diligence schedules—full statements, customer revenues, backlog, AR aging, projections, accounting policies, cap table, insurance—are not publicly verifiable.

Diligence request: Do not rely on public screen for investment decision; require full data room and management Q&A.

high medium likelihood

R-003: Venture-builder/Web3/metaverse concentration

Strategy and public milestones increasingly depend on AI/Web3/metaverse ventures and Somnia ecosystem outcomes, which may be volatile and hard to monetize.

Diligence request: Request venture-level economics, ownership, token exposure, adoption metrics, and downside scenario plan.

high medium likelihood

R-007: Customer concentration and contract economics opaque

Named logos do not disclose revenue, renewals, concentration, or contract terms; FY2024 revenue base is small enough that single relationships could be material.

Diligence request: Request top-customer schedule, contracts, renewal history, references, and related-party revenue reconciliation.

high medium likelihood

R-008: Technical execution and benchmark risk

Performance claims around virtual worlds, messaging scale, blockchain throughput, and Somnia adoption need independent verification and cost analysis.

Diligence request: Run technical diligence: architecture review, benchmarks, security audits, uptime/cost telemetry, roadmap review.

high unknown likelihood

R-009: Legal, IP, privacy, and Web3 regulatory exposure

Public sources do not resolve litigation, regulator, IP ownership, OSS, privacy, cyber, cloud, or Web3 compliance risks.

Diligence request: Obtain counsel diligence, IP schedule, OSS scan, data/security reports, regulator correspondence, and Web3 compliance memo.

medium high likelihood

R-004: Stale unicorn valuation

The $3.36B unicorn valuation dates to 2017 public market-database tracking and may not reflect current pivoted economics or investor marks.

Diligence request: Request latest valuation, investor marks, 409A/fair-value work, and secondary pricing.

medium medium likelihood

R-005: Governance and capital complexity

PSC records show founder and SVF Holdings control signals, while large historical funding implies potential preferences, veto rights, and liquidation complexity.

Diligence request: Request cap table, shareholder agreements, board minutes, investor rights, reserved matters, and option plan.

Chapter 01

01Financial Information

Improbable passes private-unicorn eligibility screens, but public financial evidence shows a major business-model pivot with sharply lower FY2024 consolidated revenue and missing private operating schedules.

I.A Annual and quarterly financial information for the past three years

partially verified confidence: medium

Public sources provide high-level 2022-2024 revenue/cash/profit signals and Companies House filing cadence, but not full statements, footnotes, backlog, or AR aging.

Evidence gaps

  • Audited income statements, balance sheets, cash-flow statements, footnotes, management accounts, backlog, AR aging, revenue by product/customer/geography.

Hidden risks

  • Revenue comparability is low after the venture-builder pivot.
  • Profitability quality may rely on one-off gains or portfolio accounting not visible publicly.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide audited FY2022-FY2024 accounts, monthly FY2025 management pack, revenue bridge by product/venture, cash burn, gross margin, AR aging, and backlog.
Public financial snapshot and pivot signal
PeriodRevenue GBP mProfit or loss GBP mCash GBP mNotes
FY202278-19140Pre-pivot company update; ~650 employees reported.
FY20236611185Company reports profitability and strong liquidity.
FY202410162.8First financial year of venture-builder model; revenue base reset.

Revenue comparability is limited by business-model change and lack of full account extraction.

Reported revenue, profit/loss, and cash trend Company-stated financial snapshots show the scale of Improbable’s pivot and liquidity position.

Do not compare periods without explaining the business-model change.

I.B Financial Projections

partially verified confidence: medium

No three-year model was public. Company disclosed FY2024 cash and a 2025 plan to invest $17M in 10+ ventures, but projected revenue, margins, capex, working capital, and financing assumptions remain private.

Evidence gaps

  • Board-approved forecast, scenarios, capex, working capital, financing plan, FX assumptions, venture-by-venture revenue and funding needs.

Hidden risks

  • Forecasts may depend on venture exits, token economics, and intercompany services rather than recurring contracted revenue.
  • FX risk exists because public reporting uses GBP while funding/FDV and planned investments are reported in USD.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide three-year quarterly financial model with downside/base/upside cases and a bridge from parent cash to venture commitments.
New product and venture pipeline
Pipeline itemEvidence
Multiple ventures per year2025 venture-builder update.
10+ venture investmentsCompany update.
SomniaFY2024/2025 update.
AI transformation / simulation venturesCompany-owned product list.
Portfolio and venture-pipeline count signals Publicly stated venture counts differ by page/date and definition.

Counts are not necessarily contradictory if definitions differ.

I.C Capital Structure

partially verified confidence: medium

CB Insights and Companies House confirm unicorn/public-control and charge signals, but shares outstanding, options/warrants/notes, debt balances, and off-balance-sheet obligations are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Fully diluted cap table, debt schedule, shareholder agreements, option/warrant/SAFE/note schedules, investor rights, off-balance-sheet liabilities.

Hidden risks

  • Large historical funding and PSC records may imply complex preference/control rights.
  • Debt security interests could restrict asset sales, venture transfers, or financing.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide cap table, financing documents, debt agreements, outstanding charge payoff/covenant certificates, and board/investor consent schedule.
Capital structure and eligibility facts
ItemPublic evidenceStatusImplication
Private-unicorn screenCB Insights lists Improbable at $3.36B, unicorn date 2017-05-11; Companies House active private limited.verifiedEligible for private-unicorn diligence, with valuation-staleness risk.
Funding totalCB profile reports $865.95M total raised and $112.02M latest round.partially_verifiedRequest primary financing history and cap table.
Major historical roundCompany says 2017 $502M funding led by SoftBank.partially_verifiedSoftBank/PSC role may affect control and exit rights.
ChargesHSBC Innovation Banking charges registered in 2024; one outstanding in reviewed register.verifiedNeed debt schedule, covenants, collateral, and consent requirements.
Private unicorn and financing timeline Timeline from incorporation through public funding and filing signals.

I.D Other financial information

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Tax positions, revenue-recognition policies, venture/intercompany accounting, and full financing history are not public; only summary funding milestones and filing status were verified.

Evidence gaps

  • Tax returns, transfer-pricing memos, revenue-recognition policy, intercompany agreements, fair-value policy, NOL/tax asset schedule.

Hidden risks

  • Intercompany revenues, venture gains/losses, and fair-value marks could distort operating performance.
  • Tax exposures may span UK and international subsidiaries.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide accounting policies, tax position memo, transfer-pricing support, valuation-policy memo, and financing-history schedule.
Chapter 02

02Products

Improbable now presents a portfolio/venture-builder product surface around metaverse, Web3, AI transformation, and deep technical infrastructure; public evidence supports breadth but not economics or product-market fit.

II.A Description of each product

partially verified confidence: medium

Public pages describe venture-building services, MSquared/virtual worlds, Somnia/Web3 infrastructure, simulation ventures, Thanos, and MML. Growth, share, cost structure, and product profitability are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Revenue and margin by product/venture, active customers/users, retention, roadmap, benchmark reports, product cost structure, IP ownership.

Hidden risks

  • Product portfolio breadth may obscure which products generate recurring revenue.
  • Highly technical claims may carry execution and infrastructure-cost risk.
  • Open-standard and venture-owned IP may weaken parent-company monetization.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide a venture/product matrix with ownership, revenue, gross margin, active customers/users, roadmap, unit economics, technical benchmarks, and sunset criteria.
Product and venture surface
SurfaceEvidenceDiligence question
Venture builder17 ventures including 7 exits; 60+ incubation-studio team.Which ventures are controlled, equity-method, revenue-generating, or service clients?
MSquared / virtual worldsBuilding page references 15,000+ users and asset mobility.What active worlds, retention, revenue, and SLAs exist?
Somnia / blockchain infrastructureFY2025 update cites Somnia FDV >$1B, 379k wallets, 1B transactions.How much economics accrue to Improbable versus the foundation/token ecosystem?
Open standards/toolsThanos and MML sites corroborate technical footprint.What IP is proprietary, open-source, or encumbered by third-party licenses?
Product economics and technical risk register
Product or capabilityMissing metric
Large-scale virtual-world techProduction benchmark, cost per concurrent user, uptime, gross margin.
Venture studio servicesPricing model, intercompany fees, ownership stakes, realized returns.
Somnia ecosystemSustainable fees, token ownership, active user retention, compliance posture.
Product and technology architecture map Conceptual map of public product/technology surfaces.

Architecture is inferred from public descriptions, not a verified systems diagram.

Chapter 03

03Customer Information

Named public relationships validate some market activity, especially BBC R&D and MLB/Yuga/Somnia signals, but top-customer lists, revenue concentration, supplier spend, and severed relationships are not public.

III.A Top customers by application

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No top-15 customer list was public. Public names are relationship signals, not a ranked revenue schedule.

Evidence gaps

  • Top customer list by application/product for FY2023-FY2025, product ownership, timing, contract status, revenue.

Hidden risks

  • Logo visibility can overstate contracted revenue.
  • Venture-related counterparties may blur customer versus investee economics.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide top-15 customer schedule by year and application, including ARR/revenue, gross margin, renewal date, and product/venture owner.
Named public customers, partners, and exits
CounterpartyEvidence
BBC R&D / MAX-RBBC says performances streamed into a 3D space hosted by project partner Improbable.
Major League BaseballCompany says partnership continued with games every Wednesday in September.
Yuga LabsCompany announced sale of Imporium to Yuga Labs.
Somnia Foundation / ecosystemCompany update says Somnia launched using Improbable-developed technology.
Customer, revenue, and supplier data gaps
Checklist areaGap
Top 15 customersCustomer revenue by application/product for FY2023-FY2025.
Revenue concentration >5%Customer concentration, renewal rates, and dependency on venture-related parties.
Top suppliersCloud spend, minimum commitments, termination rights, security addenda.
Named relationship map Publicly named customers, partners, and ecosystem relationships.

III.B Strategic relationships

partially verified confidence: medium

BBC R&D independently validates a technical trial; MLB and Yuga evidence are company-authored; Somnia is central to the 2025 venture update.

Evidence gaps

  • Executed agreements, SOWs, renewals, payment terms, exclusivity, minimums, revenue share, termination rights.

Hidden risks

  • Strategic partner announcements may not translate into durable revenue.
  • Contract rights around IP, branding, data, and revenue share are unknown.

Follow-up questions

  • Obtain partner contracts and customer references for BBC, MLB, Yuga Labs, and Somnia-related arrangements.

III.C Revenue by customer

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Revenue by customer and 5% concentration are not public; company revenue volatility increases the importance of customer-level analysis.

Evidence gaps

  • Revenue by customer, customer concentration over 5%, churn/renewal, deferred revenue, related-party revenue.

Hidden risks

  • Potential dependency on a small number of partners, token ecosystems, intercompany fees, or exit events.
  • Customer concentration could be hidden by consolidated public summaries.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide customer revenue detail, customer cohorts, and related-party revenue reconciliation.

III.D Significant relationships severed within the last two years

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No severed-relationship schedule was public. Imporium sale to Yuga Labs is a relationship/exit event, not necessarily a severed customer relationship.

Evidence gaps

  • List of terminated customers/partners/suppliers, reasons, revenue impact, residual obligations, disputes.

Hidden risks

  • Divestitures or strategic shifts may change customer commitments and revenue base.
  • Terminated contracts could create warranty, support, or IP tail obligations.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide severed-relationship log for FY2024-FY2026, including contract terminations and venture divestiture obligations.

III.E Top suppliers

partially verified confidence: medium

Only indirect supplier signals were public: cloud providers such as AWS/Google Cloud and the broader technology stack. Supplier spend and commitments are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Top suppliers, cloud spend, committed use discounts, DPAs, security addenda, termination terms.

Hidden risks

  • Cloud commitments could be material given high-scale virtual-world and blockchain workloads.
  • Supplier security/data-processing terms affect customer and regulatory obligations.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide top supplier schedule, cloud contracts, annual spend, commitments, and security/privacy addenda.
IP, contracts, privacy, and insurance diligence map
AreaMissing private material
PatentsPatent schedule, assignments, encumbrances, claim maps.
Website/IP termsCustomer license, venture IP assignment, OSS policy.
Cloud/data suppliersCloud agreements, DPAs, SOC/ISO reports, security incidents.
InsuranceD&O, E&O, cyber, employer liability, product liability, key-person policies.
Material contractsExecuted agreements, termination rights, exclusivity, revenue share, indemnities.
Chapter 04

04Competition

Improbable’s competitive set spans venture studios, metaverse platforms, Web3 infrastructure, and AI simulation; public evidence supports positioning but not market share or win/loss performance.

IV.A Competitive landscape by market segment

partially verified confidence: medium

Improbable competes on technical depth, capital availability, founder support, and named partnerships, but market share and pricing position are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Market-size analysis, market share, pricing, win/loss data, competitor benchmarks, founder/customer pipeline.

Hidden risks

  • Competitive boundaries are diffuse, increasing strategic focus risk.
  • Venture-studio economics may be competed away by founders seeking less dilution.
  • Token/Web3 infrastructure competition is intense and cyclical.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide market maps, segment revenue, win/loss analysis, pricing policy, and benchmark comparisons versus key competitors.
Competitive landscape by segment
SegmentLikely competitors or alternatives
Venture studio / deep-tech builderVC studios, accelerators, corporate venture builders, strategic investors.
Metaverse / virtual experiencesGame engines, event platforms, Roblox/Fortnite ecosystems, bespoke Unreal/Unity developers.
Web3 infrastructureOther L1/L2 chains, appchains, centralized event tech.
AI simulation / supply-chain toolsDigital-twin, simulation, AI planning and enterprise optimization vendors.
Competitive strengths and weaknesses
Strength or weaknessDiligence takeaway
Strength: deep capitalization and investor networkUseful for venture-building credibility, but financing terms may be complex.
Strength: named technical partnersStrong logos; verify recurring revenue and referenceability.
Weakness: volatile reported revenueHarder to benchmark against conventional SaaS or infrastructure peers.
Weakness: Web3/metaverse concentrationExposure to adoption cycles and token valuation volatility.
Competitive segment map Qualitative market map of Improbable’s competing segments.

Competitor names were not exhaustively researched; map is segment-oriented.

Chapter 05

05Marketing, Sales, and Distribution

Go-to-market appears centered on founder sourcing, strategic partnerships, thought leadership, and venture launches; sales productivity, pipeline, quotas, CAC, and marketing budget are not public.

V.A Strategy and implementation

partially verified confidence: medium

Public strategy positions Improbable as a builder of AI, Web3, and metaverse ventures with strategic-partner proof points and updated marketing leadership.

Evidence gaps

  • Channel strategy, marketing calendar, budget, lead sources, conversion rates, geographic focus.

Hidden risks

  • Marketing may need to educate several markets simultaneously.
  • Repositioning can dilute legacy brand equity from gaming/defence/simulation roots.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide FY2025-FY2027 marketing plan, channel budget, funnel metrics, and positioning tests.
Marketing and distribution motions
MotionLikely objective
Founder/venture inboundSource and incubate deep-tech ventures.
Thought leadership / newsCreate credibility with founders, partners, and investors.
Strategic partnershipsBuild anchor use cases and validate venture exits.
Sales and marketing capacity indicators
IndicatorInterpretation
CMO appointmentMarketing leadership investment aligns with AI/Web3 repositioning.
Open commercial/technical rolesHiring supports venture/platform operations.
Cash capacityLikely budget ability for near-term venture marketing, but allocation unknown.
Venture-builder go-to-market funnel Publicly described venture-building stages.

No sales pipeline counts, CAC, quota, or conversion metrics were public.

V.B Major Customers

partially verified confidence: medium

Public major-customer evidence is logo/relationship-based rather than pipeline or account-development data.

Evidence gaps

  • Account plans, pipeline, renewal/expansion opportunities, references, revenue by major customer.

Hidden risks

  • Pipeline quality may depend on a few brand-name events or ventures.
  • No renewal or expansion data public.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide customer pipeline, opportunity stages, renewal schedule, and account-development plans for top relationships.

V.C Principal avenues for generating new business

partially verified confidence: medium

New business likely comes from founder inbound/outbound, portfolio launches, strategic partnerships, and investor networks described by the Building page.

Evidence gaps

  • Founder funnel, source channels, acceptance rate, venture stage gates, investor syndication pipeline.

Hidden risks

  • Success depends on selecting high-potential founders and maintaining differentiated operating support.
  • Revenue timing may lag because venture equity value is realized later than services revenue.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide venture sourcing funnel with leads, diligence pass rates, investment committee decisions, and signed founder agreements.

V.D Sales force productivity model

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No sales-force model, compensation, quota, sales cycle, or hiring plan is public; open roles provide only indirect capacity signals.

Evidence gaps

  • Sales org chart, quota, comp plans, cycle length, conversion, hiring plan, churn.

Hidden risks

  • Without sales metrics, public revenue forecasts cannot be tested.
  • Venture-builder deal cycles may not map to traditional quota models.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide sales and business-development productivity model, compensation plan, and headcount plan by role.
Headcount signal reconciliation Publicly visible people-count signals are not directly comparable.

This figure should not be read as a layoff chart without internal headcount bridge.

V.E Ability to implement marketing plan with current and projected budgets

partially verified confidence: medium

Cash balance suggests capacity, but marketing and venture budgets are not public. Planned $17M venture investment provides an outer signal, not a GTM budget.

Evidence gaps

  • Approved budget by function, cash runway, committed investments, marketing ROI.

Hidden risks

  • Cash could be earmarked for debt, venture support, or operations rather than marketing.
  • Web3/AI market cycles could require higher-than-planned spend.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide board-approved budget, marketing spend, venture commitments, and liquidity runway under downside cases.
Chapter 06

06Research and Development

R&D evidence points to a technically ambitious platform spanning virtual-world scale, Web3, MML/Thanos, and simulation ventures; benchmark, security, roadmap, and cost data remain private.

VI.A Description of R&D organization

partially verified confidence: medium

Public data show a 60+ incubation studio and leadership/role signals, but not a detailed R&D org chart, allocation, or budget.

Evidence gaps

  • R&D org chart, budget, allocation by product/venture, key-person dependencies, security and QA process.

Hidden risks

  • Studio capacity may be stretched across 12-17 ventures and multiple deep-tech areas.
  • Critical R&D may sit in ventures rather than parent company.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide R&D staffing plan, budget, roadmap owners, dependency map, and key-person retention plan.
R&D organization and technical assets
Asset or teamR D question
Incubation studioFunction mix, seniority, and allocation by venture.
Networking/rendering/spatial audioBenchmark proof, roadmap, cloud cost, and production reliability.
Blockchain / SomniaProtocol ownership, security audits, mainnet reliability, token economics.
MML / ThanosAdoption, licenses, governance, and maintainers.

VI.B New Product Pipeline

partially verified confidence: medium

Company expects to launch multiple ventures annually and invest $17M in 10+ ventures; Somnia and AI/Web3 ventures are highlighted, but cost/timing/status by product is not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Product roadmap, development cost by venture, launch gates, critical dependencies, security audits, IP ownership, code quality metrics.

Hidden risks

  • Product pipeline may be dependent on token-market conditions and external ecosystem adoption.
  • Unclear IP allocation between parent and ventures may impair monetization.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide product pipeline dashboard, technology readiness levels, launch budgets, audit results, and IP assignment/open-source inventory.
Chapter 07

07Management and Personnel

Founder leadership, officer/PSC records, selected management bios, and people-count signals are public; current org chart, compensation, equity incentives, employee-relations issues, and turnover are not public.

VII.A Organization Chart

partially verified confidence: medium

No full org chart is public. Companies House and the About page identify directors, founder, and selected executives; PSC records identify significant-control parties.

Evidence gaps

  • Full org chart, board composition, committee charters, reporting lines, succession plan.

Hidden risks

  • Governance and reporting lines may be complex due to investors, ventures, and PSCs.
  • Recent role changes can disrupt execution if not integrated.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide current org chart, board/committee structure, reporting lines, and succession/key-person plan.
Public management, officers, and control signals
Person or entityEvidence
Herman NarulaAbout page bio and Companies House officer/PSC records.
Robert WhiteheadAbout page and Companies House officer record.
SVF Holdings (UK) LLPCompanies House PSC record.
Robin Šmíd / Mark Shepherd / CMO appointmentAbout and CMO announcement.
Headcount and personnel signals
SignalPeriod or context
EmployeesFY2022 company update.
People across groupFY2023 modern slavery group statement.
Incubation studio teamCurrent about page.
Open rolesCareers page point-in-time.

Signals are not directly comparable; request a reconciled monthly headcount bridge.

Public management and control chart Publicly visible management and control relationships.

Not a full board or management org chart.

VII.B Historical and projected headcount by function and location

partially verified confidence: medium

Public headcount signals are inconsistent by scope: ~650 FY2022 employees, >800 FY2023 group people, and 60+ current incubation-studio team.

Evidence gaps

  • Monthly headcount by function/location/entity, contractor count, hiring plan, attrition, vacancy list.

Hidden risks

  • A smaller studio may limit execution capacity; a larger group footprint may imply hidden subsidiary/contractor obligations.
  • Projected hiring and turnover are unknown.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide reconciled headcount bridge from FY2022 to current by entity/function/location and hiring plan by venture.

VII.C Senior management biographies

partially verified confidence: medium

About page provides biographies for founder and selected executives; Companies House provides officer records, but complete CVs, tenure, and references are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Management CVs, employment history, references, tenure, responsibilities, background checks.

Hidden risks

  • Bios do not prove execution capacity across all ventures.
  • Recent leadership changes need retention and integration diligence.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide management bios/CVs, references, background checks, responsibilities, and key-person risk assessment.

VII.D Compensation arrangements

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No employment agreements, compensation summaries, or benefit plans were public.

Evidence gaps

  • Employment agreements, bonus plans, severance, benefits, change-of-control terms.

Hidden risks

  • Key-person retention, severance, change-of-control, and bonus obligations may materially affect transaction terms.
  • Venture-specific comp may create conflicts.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide compensation schedules and key executive employment agreements.

VII.E Incentive stock plans

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No option pool, EMI plan, RSU, phantom equity, or venture-level incentive plan was public.

Evidence gaps

  • Option pool, grant ledger, vesting schedules, exercise prices, EMI/tax compliance, venture equity incentives.

Hidden risks

  • Unseen dilution and venture-level incentives may alter economics and retention.
  • Investor/founder preference rights may interact with employee incentives.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide incentive plan documents and grant-by-grant schedule.

VII.F Significant employee relations problems, past or present

inconclusive confidence: low

No employee-relations problems were found in reviewed public sources, but no tribunal/search/interview work was performed.

Evidence gaps

  • Employee claims, tribunal/litigation records, whistleblowing logs, grievance logs, health/safety incidents.

Hidden risks

  • Past restructurings or pivots may have created employment claims not visible publicly.
  • International subsidiaries add jurisdictional complexity.

Follow-up questions

  • Ask counsel/HR for employee-relations issue log and pending claims; run jurisdiction-specific searches.
Legal, regulatory, and secured-interest records
AreaStatus
Entity statusverified
Accounts filingsverified
Chargesverified
Litigationinconclusive
Modern slavery / workforce complianceverified
Legal and diligence risk heatmap Severity/likelihood matrix for principal legal and public-source diligence risks.

VII.G Personnel Turnover

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Turnover data and retention benefits are not public. Headcount signal changes make turnover/restructuring diligence high priority.

Evidence gaps

  • Monthly attrition, regretted attrition, retention plans, exit interview themes, benefit changes.

Hidden risks

  • Turnover could impair deep technical execution and customer continuity.
  • High venture churn may be hidden by parent-level metrics.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide two-year turnover dashboard by function/location/entity plus retention plan and benefits overview.
Chapter 08

08Legal and Related Matters

Companies House/legal pages verify active status, filings, charges, basic privacy/terms, and patent-count signal, but litigation, regulatory, contract, insurance, and IP ownership require private legal diligence.

VIII.A Pending lawsuits against the Company

inconclusive confidence: low

No pending lawsuits against Improbable were found in reviewed public sources, but searches were not comprehensive.

Evidence gaps

  • Counsel litigation schedule, court searches, claims correspondence, arbitration/tribunal records.

Hidden risks

  • Material litigation could exist in court systems, subsidiaries, employment tribunals, or arbitration outside reviewed sources.
  • Web3/live-events/IP activities increase potential dispute surface.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide counsel letter and litigation schedule; conduct UK, US, EU, and subsidiary jurisdiction searches.

VIII.B Pending lawsuits initiated by Company

inconclusive confidence: low

No company-initiated lawsuits were found in reviewed public sources; comprehensive court database searches were not completed.

Evidence gaps

  • Company litigation docket, outside counsel invoices, settlement agreements, arbitration records.

Hidden risks

  • Potential IP enforcement or contract disputes may be non-public or in foreign jurisdictions.
  • Recoveries/costs could affect valuation.

Follow-up questions

  • Ask counsel for all open/threatened claims initiated by Improbable or subsidiaries.

VIII.C Environmental and employee safety issues and liabilities

partially verified confidence: medium

No environmental/safety liabilities were found publicly; modern slavery statement provides supply-chain/people compliance posture.

Evidence gaps

  • H&S policies, incident logs, environmental liabilities, modern slavery supplier due diligence, contractor audits.

Hidden risks

  • Live events, offices, and international subsidiaries may create health/safety obligations not visible online.
  • Supplier and contractor risk exists in global operations.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide health/safety incident log, modern-slavery supplier diligence, and international compliance status.

VIII.D Material patents, copyrights, licenses, and trademarks

partially verified confidence: low

CB Insights reports 27 patents and public terms assert website IP, but material IP schedule, assignments, licenses, OSS, trademarks, and venture IP split were not verified.

Evidence gaps

  • Patent/trademark/copyright schedules, assignments, licenses, OSS bill of materials, invention assignment agreements, encumbrances.

Hidden risks

  • Key IP may be owned by ventures, foundations, employees, contractors, or open-source projects.
  • Patent encumbrances from investors/debt/customer contracts could exist.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide IP schedule, patent-family analysis, trademark search, OSS scan, IP assignments, and venture IP agreements.

VIII.E Insurance coverage and material exposures

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Insurance coverage is not public; material exposures likely include cyber/privacy, live immersive events, Web3/regulatory, D&O, E&O, employer liability, and IP.

Evidence gaps

  • Insurance policies, limits, exclusions, claims history, broker letters.

Hidden risks

  • Coverage gaps could be material given platform, data, live-event, and Web3 exposure.
  • D&O coverage is important with large investors and complex governance.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide complete insurance schedule and claims history; obtain broker coverage adequacy memo.

VIII.F Material contracts

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Public materials identify cloud providers and named partner relationships, but no material customer, supplier, investor, venture, or service contracts are public.

Evidence gaps

  • Material contract list, customer/partner agreements, cloud contracts, venture service agreements, investor rights, debt documents.

Hidden risks

  • Unknown exclusivity, data rights, revenue share, IP ownership, change-of-control, and termination provisions.
  • Cloud commitments could materially affect unit economics.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide material contracts over threshold, including customer, cloud, venture, financing, and IP/license agreements.

VIII.G Regulatory agency problems

inconclusive confidence: low

No regulatory agency problems were found in reviewed public sources; however, Web3, privacy, employment, and international operations require counsel confirmation.

Evidence gaps

  • Regulator correspondence, privacy incidents, security incidents, AML/sanctions review for Web3 exposure, employment regulator records.

Hidden risks

  • Somnia/Web3 ecosystem, data processing, international hiring, and live events may trigger regulatory scrutiny.
  • Absence of public enforcement does not prove no inquiries.

Follow-up questions

  • Request regulatory inquiries log, privacy/security incident register, Web3 compliance memo, and counsel confirmation.

Evidence

Evidence claims
IDClaimStatusSources
EC-001 Improbable Worlds Limited is an active UK private limited company incorporated on 16 May 2012. verified high SRC-003
EC-002 Improbable remains listed by CB Insights as a unicorn valued at $3.36B with a 5/11/2017 unicorn date. verified high SRC-001
EC-003 CB Insights profiles Improbable as alive, founded in 2012, London-based, with $865.95M total raised and a $112.02M latest round. partially verified medium SRC-002
EC-004 Public control records identify Herman Narula and SVF Holdings (UK) LLP as persons with significant control, while Companies House officers list current directors. verified high SRC-005SRC-006
EC-005 Company milestone pages describe major financing events including a $20M 2015 investment and a $502M 2017 SoftBank-led funding round. partially verified medium SRC-008
EC-006 Improbable reported profitability in 2023, with £66M revenue, £11M profit, and £185M cash. partially verified medium SRC-017
EC-007 Improbable reported 2022 revenue of £78M, losses reduced to £19M, cash of £140M, and around 650 employees. partially verified medium SRC-018
EC-008 Improbable reported FY2024 group revenue of £10M, cash of £162.8M, 12 ventures, Somnia FDV over $1B, 379,000 wallets, 1B transactions to 27 October 2025, and plans to invest $17M in 10+ ventures. partially verified medium SRC-019
EC-009 Improbable describes itself as a 13-year tech venture builder with 17 ventures including 7 exits and a 60+ person incubation studio. partially verified medium SRC-008
EC-010 Improbable homepage language states nine ventures launched and six exits, which conflicts with or predates the About page count of 17 ventures including 7 exits. partially verified medium SRC-009SRC-008
EC-011 The Building page describes Improbable venture-building support across funding, product and engineering, people, legal, partnerships, operations, and deep technology. verified high SRC-011
EC-012 Improbable claims technical breakthroughs in high-scale networking, rendering, spatial audio, blockchain, Thanos, and MML. partially verified medium SRC-011SRC-022SRC-023
EC-013 BBC R&D independently reported that a MAX-R music trial used an Improbable-hosted 3D space/testbed and Improbable platform users could join as avatars. verified high SRC-021
EC-014 Improbable announced continuing work with Major League Baseball on the Virtual Ballpark, including September weekly baseball games. partially verified medium SRC-020
EC-015 Improbable announced the sale of Imporium to long-standing partner Yuga Labs. partially verified medium SRC-024
EC-016 Improbable careers pages showed open roles including treasury, front-end, platform engineering for Somnia, and marketing, indicating continuing hiring around venture/platform needs. partially verified medium SRC-013
EC-017 Improbable privacy materials identify Cyber Essentials Plus and cloud providers such as Google Cloud and AWS. verified high SRC-014
EC-018 Improbable website terms state website content belongs to Improbable and terms are governed by English law. verified high SRC-015
EC-019 The modern slavery statement described more than 800 people across UK and international operations for FY2023 and was approved by Herman Narula. verified high SRC-016
EC-020 Companies House charge records show 2024 HSBC Innovation Banking charges, with two satisfied in 2025 and one outstanding at the time reviewed. verified high SRC-007
EC-021 No material pending litigation was found in the public sources reviewed, but no comprehensive litigation search was performed. inconclusive low SRC-003SRC-015
EC-022 CB Insights reports 27 patents for Improbable, but material patent details and ownership chains were not verified. partially verified low SRC-002
EC-023 Improbable’s venture model includes funding, strategic support, legal, operations, product, engineering, people, and partnerships support to portfolio companies. verified high SRC-011
EC-024 Core diligence items such as complete financial statements, projections, cap table, customer revenue concentration, backlog, sales productivity, compensation, and insurance are not publicly verifiable from reviewed sources. not publicly verifiable high SRC-003SRC-008SRC-019
EC-025 Improbable appears to meet private-unicorn screening criteria: active private company, no IPO or acquisition found, and CB Insights valuation above $1B. verified high SRC-001SRC-002SRC-003
EC-026 Improbable’s 2025 messaging deepens focus on AI and Web3 and includes appointment of a former Revolut/Bitpanda executive as CMO. partially verified medium SRC-025
EC-027 BBC, Thanos, and MML evidence corroborate that Improbable’s technology stack extends beyond a single consumer product into infrastructure and standards for virtual worlds. partially verified medium SRC-021SRC-022SRC-023SRC-011
EC-028 Companies House filing-history snippets show accounts activity through the 2024 reporting period. verified high SRC-004
Sources
IDPublisherTitleAccessed
SRC-001 CB Insights The Complete List Of Unicorn Companies 2026-05-17
SRC-002 CB Insights Improbable company profile 2026-05-17
SRC-003 Companies House Improbable Worlds Limited overview 2026-05-17
SRC-004 Companies House Improbable Worlds Limited filing history 2026-05-17
SRC-005 Companies House Improbable Worlds Limited officers 2026-05-17
SRC-006 Companies House Improbable Worlds Limited persons with significant control 2026-05-17
SRC-007 Companies House Improbable Worlds Limited charges 2026-05-17
SRC-008 Improbable About Us 2026-05-17
SRC-009 Improbable Improbable homepage 2026-05-17
SRC-010 Improbable Capital 2026-05-17
SRC-011 Improbable Building 2026-05-17
SRC-012 Improbable Ventures 2026-05-17
SRC-013 Improbable Careers 2026-05-17
SRC-014 Improbable Privacy Policy 2026-05-17
SRC-015 Improbable Website Terms 2026-05-17
SRC-016 Improbable Modern Slavery Statement 2026-05-17
SRC-017 Improbable Improbable achieves profitability in 2023 and launches its Venture Builder model with a strong capital position to pursue new investments 2026-05-17
SRC-018 Improbable Improbable Innovation Update: Improbable ventures into new worlds, unveils robust financial performance 2026-05-17
SRC-019 Improbable Improbable provides update on its venture builder model; blockchain powered by Improbable-developed technology hits $1bn valuation milestone 2026-05-17
SRC-020 Improbable Improbable and Major League Baseball continue their partnership to host baseball games in the Virtual Ballpark every Wednesday in September 2026-05-17
SRC-021 BBC Research & Development Trialling live music performances in immersive 3D worlds: MAX-R 2026-05-17
SRC-022 Thanos Thanos 2026-05-17
SRC-023 MML Metaverse Markup Language 2026-05-17
SRC-024 Improbable Improbable sells Imporium to its long-standing partner, Yuga Labs 2026-05-17
SRC-025 Improbable Venture Builder Improbable deepens focus on AI & web3, appoints former Revolut & Bitpanda executive as Chief Marketing Officer 2026-05-17

Disclaimer

This report is a public-evidence diligence snapshot, not investment advice. Important financial, legal, technical, and contractual facts remain non-public and should be verified directly with management and primary documents before any investment decision.