Startup Diligence
Diligence report Wealthtech / RIA custody and advisor software Late-stage private unicorn

Altruist

Altruist Startup Diligence Research Report

The attractive diligence thesis is an integrated RIA custody and software platform that can reduce advisor workflow fragmentation and compete with incumbents through product velocity and low-friction pricing. The counter-thesis is that regulated custody, low/no platform fees, AI data processing and incumbent competition create compliance, margin and execution risk that cannot be underwritten without private financial, customer, regulatory and technical evidence.

Company profile

Altruist Startup Diligence Research Report

Altruist merits continued diligence as a high-growth, late-stage wealthtech/custody platform with visible funding momentum, advisor-scale claims, product breadth and regulated-entity infrastructure. The diligence posture should remain risk-forward: public materials do not disclose consolidated economics, capital structure, customer concentration, sales productivity, full regulatory remediation or AI/data-control evidence.

Website
altruist.com
Sector
Wealthtech / RIA custody and advisor software
Geography
United States; public records cite Culver City, CA and Dallas, TX regulated-entity office
Stage
Late-stage private unicorn
Known aliases
Altruist Corp, Altruist LLC, Altruist Financial LLC, Hazel AI, Shareholders Service Group
Report version
1.0
Timezone
America/Los_Angeles

Executive summary

Strengths

  • Public Series F materials state a $152M GIC-led round at approximately $1.9B valuation and over 4,700 advisors.
  • Altruist’s homepage publicly positions the company as an integrated wealth platform for independent advisors with 6,000+ advisors and 25+ integrations.
  • Official and company sources support that Altruist operates regulated broker-dealer/adviser entities, though controls and remediation require private review.

Risks

  • Regulatory/compliance risk is high because Altruist operates broker-dealer/custody infrastructure and has a public BrokerCheck disclosure plus a reported FINRA fine/restitution item.
  • Financial opacity is high: consolidated financials, revenue mix, unit economics, cash burn, runway and capital structure are not public.
  • AI/privacy risk is high because Hazel and the platform process sensitive financial, identity, tax and communications data.

Gaps

  • Audited consolidated financials, monthly KPI pack, cap table, cash runway, debt, tax and accounting-policy documents.
  • Customer revenue/AUC concentration, retention, churn, NRR, top customers, major contracts and direct reference calls.
  • FINRA AWC/exam letters/remediation, SOC 2 report, incident history, insurance policies and customer-facing protection disclosures.
  • Hazel AI data maps, model evaluations, vendor contracts, privacy impact assessments and AI governance artifacts.
  • Sales productivity, pipeline conversion, CAC/payback, quota attainment, marketing budget and competitive win/loss data.

Recommended next steps

  • Open finance, legal/regulatory, customer and technical data-room workstreams before any valuation underwriting.
  • Prioritize primary regulatory-document review and remediation testing for the FINRA disclosure/fine item.
  • Run customer-reference calls with named and randomly sampled advisors, including SSG-migrated cohorts.
  • Conduct technical/security diligence on custody platform reliability, SOC 2 exceptions, AI data flows and vendor controls.
  • Benchmark pricing and win/loss against Schwab, Fidelity, Pershing, Orion, Tamarac and Betterment Advisor Solutions.

Risk register

high high likelihood

R-002: Regulatory/compliance supervision risk in broker-dealer/custody operations

Altruist operates regulated broker-dealer/adviser infrastructure and has at least one public FINRA disclosure event plus a reported FINRA fine/restitution item.

Diligence request: Obtain FINRA AWC, exam letters, remediation evidence, compliance staffing model, supervision testing, customer notices and board compliance reporting.

high medium likelihood

R-001: Consolidated financial opacity and valuation-quality risk

Public sources disclose financing and valuation anchors but not consolidated revenue, margin, burn, cash, debt, cohort retention or cap-table preference economics.

Diligence request: Require audited consolidated financials, monthly KPI pack, cash runway, revenue bridge, cap table, liquidation preferences and debt/off-balance-sheet schedules.

high medium likelihood

R-003: Customer/AUC concentration, retention and economics unknown

Public advisor counts and named relationships do not reveal paying customer concentration, active usage, AUC quality, churn, NRR, pipeline or profitability.

Diligence request: Request top-customer schedules, cohort retention, revenue/AUC concentration, customer references, lost deals and pipeline conversion data.

high medium likelihood

R-004: Incumbent and software-platform competitive pressure

Altruist competes with scaled custodians and advisor-software incumbents that have brand, balance-sheet, product breadth and distribution advantages.

Diligence request: Perform win/loss calls, RIA segment analysis, competitive pricing review and migration-cost/customer-switching diligence.

high medium likelihood

R-005: Monetization and unit-economics uncertainty behind low-friction pricing

No-platform-fee and low software-fee positioning can be compelling but requires custody economics, cash sweep, trading/order-routing, service-cost and AI/product-margin validation.

Diligence request: Build revenue/gross-margin bridge by product/account cohort and validate fee schedule, payment for order flow, sweep economics, support costs and software attach rates.

high medium likelihood

R-006: AI, privacy and sensitive-data governance risk

Hazel and the platform process sensitive financial, identity, communications and tax data; public controls need technical and legal verification.

Diligence request: Review data maps, subprocessor/vendor contracts, AI evaluations, SOC 2 report, incident history, retention schedules, model-risk governance and privacy impact assessments.

medium medium likelihood

R-007: SSG acquisition integration and custody migration risk

The SSG acquisition added a legacy RIA brokerage/custodial platform and thousands of advisors, creating integration, retention and operational-conversion risk.

Diligence request: Request acquisition agreement, migration plan, churn/retention analysis, operational incident log and synergy/cost integration tracking.

medium medium likelihood

R-008: Scaling organization and executive retention risk

Public leadership hires strengthen capability, but headcount plans, turnover, founder dependency and compensation obligations are not public.

Diligence request: Obtain org chart, employment agreements, turnover data, hiring plan, compensation bands, equity plan, employee-relations logs and executive references.

Chapter 01

01Financial Information

Altruist has strong public financing and valuation signals, but consolidated operating financials, revenue mix, unit economics, cash runway and capital structure are not public. Broker-dealer financial-condition statements and SEC/FINRA filings help validate regulated-entity facts but do not replace private financial diligence.

I.A Annual and quarterly financial information for the past three years

not publicly verifiable confidence: medium

No public consolidated income statements, balance sheets, cash flows, backlog, AR aging or management financial reports were found. Public sources provide broker-dealer financial-condition statement listings, financing claims and regulatory facts only.

Evidence gaps

  • Audited consolidated financial statements for the past three years.
  • Monthly management accounts, ARR/revenue bridge, gross margin by stream, backlog, AR aging, cash/debt and budget-to-actuals.

Hidden risks

  • Revenue concentration, cash burn, debt, margin pressure and AR quality may be hidden by public growth narratives.
  • Broker-dealer financial-condition statements may not reflect parent-company burn or software/AI economics.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide audited consolidated financial statements and monthly KPI/financial packs for the last 36 months.
  • Reconcile broker-dealer regulatory financial statements to consolidated parent-company accounts.
Financial-information coverage matrix
financial requestpublic evidence foundstatuswhy it matters
Consolidated income statements, balance sheets, cash flows and footnotesNo consolidated company financial statements found; only broker-dealer financial-condition statement listing.Not publicCannot underwrite ARR, gross margin, burn, cash runway, debt or solvency.
Planned versus actual results and management reportsNo public board/KPI pack; public releases only claim triple-digit growth and AUM/advisor scale.Not publicGrowth consistency and forecast credibility remain unknown.
Sales/gross profit by product, channel and geographyProduct and pricing pages show modules and some fee terms; no revenue mix or gross margin.Partial product visibilityLow-fee positioning can hide reliance on spread, custody or transaction economics.
Accounts receivable, backlog and current liquidityNo AR aging/backlog/cash schedule; ADV provides an adviser employee-count anchor only.Not publicWorking-capital needs and billing quality are not visible.

This table intentionally separates regulated-entity filings from consolidated venture-company financials.

I.B Financial Projections

not publicly verifiable confidence: medium

Public sources support growth drivers—advisor growth, AUM growth, product breadth and low-friction pricing—but do not disclose projections, assumptions, capital expenditures, working capital or external-financing needs.

Evidence gaps

  • Three-year quarterly projections by product/channel/customer and assumptions.
  • CAC, LTV, AUC/AUM growth, cash sweep assumptions, support cost, capex/working-capital and financing plan.

Hidden risks

  • A growth plan may depend on continued venture funding, spread economics, advisor migration rates or compliance spending not visible publicly.
  • Low software fees could pressure gross margin unless offset by custody or cash economics.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide board-approved financial plan with downside/base/upside scenarios and variance history.
  • Provide revenue/gross-margin bridge by custody, software, AI, cash sweep, trading/order and other streams.
Revenue-model hypotheses and required proof
revenue or cost driverpublic signalprojection dependencyprivate evidence needed
Custody / brokerage / account economicsRegulated broker-dealer/adviser and custody platform positioning.AUC growth, cash balances, transaction activity, spread/order economics and service cost.Revenue by stream, account-level gross margin, sweep-bank terms, order-routing economics and support cost.
Portfolio accounting / reporting / billing softwareNo platform fees for Altruist accounts; $1/month external-account fee above first 100.Advisor migration to Altruist custody, external-account usage and enterprise contracts.Fee schedule, ARR by product, attach rates, churn and grandfathering commitments.
AI and automation productsHazel public ROI/time-savings claims and data-processing functionality.Adoption, accuracy, liability controls and willingness to pay.AI product P&L, usage cohorts, incident/escalation logs, model evaluations and vendor costs.
Capital needs and external financingSeries E and F raises, valuation around $1.9B, no public burn/cash runway.Runway, compliance investment, product hiring and acquisition integration costs.Cash bridge, debt, monthly burn, budget-to-actuals and next financing assumptions.

These are underwriting hypotheses, not confirmed revenue streams.

Publicly announced late-stage funding amounts Bar chart of public Series E and Series F amounts.

Funding amounts are gross announced amounts, not net proceeds or remaining cash.

I.C Capital Structure

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Public financing announcements reveal round amounts and selected investors but not shares outstanding, option pool, warrants, notes, debt, preferences, investor ownership or off-balance-sheet obligations.

Evidence gaps

  • Current cap table, fully diluted shares, option/warrant/note schedule, debt instruments, SAFEs/convertibles and off-balance-sheet liabilities.

Hidden risks

  • Late-stage preference stack, participating preferred, debt covenants, secondary transactions or unallocated option pool could materially alter economics.
  • Flat-looking valuation markers may mask investor-friendly terms.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide post-Series F pro forma cap table, financing documents, preference stack, debt schedule and option-pool plan.

I.D Other financial information

partially verified confidence: medium

Public sources provide financing-history anchors but not tax positions, revenue-recognition policies, NOLs or full accounting policies. Public broker-dealer financial-condition statements should be reviewed, but consolidated accounting policy diligence is still needed.

Evidence gaps

  • Tax returns/NOL schedule, accounting policies, revenue-recognition memo, regulatory net capital details, financing history by investor and ownership percentage.

Hidden risks

  • Revenue-recognition, regulatory net-capital, tax, transfer-pricing, NOL and financing-term risks remain open.
  • Investor basis and ownership cannot be determined from press releases.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide tax/accounting policy memos, regulatory net capital computations and complete financing history including investor basis and ownership.
Public financing and valuation anchors
milestonedate or periodpublic amount or valuationnamed investors or contextdiligence readthrough
Series E announcementPublic note; date not independently extracted$169M raiseICONIQ Growth, Granite Capital Management, Adams Street Partners, Sound VenturesLarge growth-financing signal; terms, preferences and use of proceeds remain private.
CB Insights unicorn list2024-04-16 row date$1.9B valuation listingVenrock, Endeavor, Adams Street PartnersIndependent valuation/status screen; not a substitute for cap-table diligence.
Series F announcement2025-04-22$152M at approximately $1.9B valuationGIC led; Salesforce Ventures, Geodesic Capital, Baillie Gifford, Carson Family Office, ICONIQ Growth and select partners participatedConfirms continued access to late-stage capital; flat/near-flat valuation versus CB marker should be reconciled to terms and dilution.

Public financing evidence does not reveal liquidation preferences, option pool, debt, secondary sales or post-money ownership.

Altruist public financing and regulatory timeline Chronology of public financing, acquisition and regulatory/legal milestones found in standard diligence.

Series E date is shown at year precision because a reliable exact publication date was not extracted.

Chapter 02

02Products

Altruist publicly offers an integrated RIA wealth platform spanning account opening, custody/trading, portfolio management, billing, reporting, client portal and Hazel AI. Public pricing and security claims are visible, but adoption depth, uptime, unit economics and AI/control evidence require private diligence.

II.A Description of each product

partially verified confidence: medium

The public product surface is substantial and coherent for RIAs, with integrated custody/software workflows and AI automation. Major customers/applications and product costs are partially visible; growth rates, market share and profitability require private data.

Evidence gaps

  • Product usage by module, reliability/SLOs, support tickets, product-level gross margin, roadmap and AI evaluation results.
  • Technical architecture, SOC report, penetration-test summaries and customer implementation metrics.

Hidden risks

  • Product breadth can increase operational complexity, cyber surface area and compliance burden.
  • No-platform-fee positioning may obscure unit-economics pressure.
  • AI outputs may create suitability, privacy and model-risk exposures.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide product analytics, uptime/incident history, roadmap, gross margin by product, AI governance and architecture documents.
  • Provide pricing realization and full fee schedule by customer cohort.
Product-surface map
modulepublic descriptionevidence statusdiligence focus
Account opening and custody workflowPart of the integrated wealth platform for independent advisors.Company-verified product claimTime-to-open, rejection rates, custody migration, account errors and support burden.
Trading and rebalancingHomepage lists trading; Series F cites T3 all-star recognition in trading/rebalancing.Company/press-release claimOrder quality, controls, best execution, uptime and regulatory supervision.
Portfolio management, billing, reporting and client portalProduct pages state PAS/reporting/fee billing/client portal at no additional cost for Altruist accounts.Company-verified public pricing claimAttach rates, reliability, cost to serve and monetization.
Hazel AIAI assistant using documents, CRM, custodial, email, meeting and tax data.Company/Hazel claimAccuracy, privacy, model-risk controls and advisor adoption.

Public product descriptions do not establish product-level profitability or uptime.

Public pricing terms and hidden economics
pricing itempublic termpossible hidden or adjacent economicsrequired diligence
Platform / PAS for Altruist-custodied accountsNo platform fees / no additional cost for Altruist accounts.Custody economics, cash sweep, transaction economics, support load and account minimums.Full revenue by stream and account cohort gross margin.
Connected non-Altruist accountsFirst 100 free; then $1 per account per month.Enterprise discounts, usage limits, data aggregation/vendor costs.Contracts, grandfathering, external-account count distribution and margin.
AI automationHazel pages emphasize ROI/time savings; public standalone pricing not verified.AI vendor costs, compliance review, support and liability reserves.Pricing, vendor contracts, COGS and usage-based cost curves.

No public source confirmed all possible charges, enterprise pricing or pass-through fees.

Security, data and control dependencies by product area
areapublic control claim or policyrisk if control failsprivate artifact needed
Custody/brokerage platformSEC/FINRA registered broker-dealer; SOC 2 Type 2; annual third-party pentesting.Operational outage, client asset/accounting error, regulatory sanction or loss of advisor trust.SOC report, incident logs, BCP/DR tests, best-execution and supervision reports.
Hazel AINo model training on customer data and zero data retention with core AI model providers.Sensitive data leakage, unsuitable advice workflow, privacy breach or regulatory action.AI architecture, vendor DPAs, evaluations, red-team results and access logs.
Client/advisor dataPrivacy policy discloses collection of SSN/TIN, DOB, account activity, bank data and communications.Identity theft, privacy claims, customer churn and regulatory reporting obligations.Data map, retention schedule, subprocessor list, incident history and privacy impact assessments.

This is a risk-control map, not a completed security audit.

Altruist platform and data-flow architecture from public descriptions Publicly inferred architecture of advisor workflows, custody/brokerage, reporting/billing and Hazel AI data dependencies.

Diagram is derived from public descriptions and must be replaced by actual architecture in technical diligence.

Chapter 03

03Customer Information

Public evidence shows meaningful advisor scale signals and named relationships, including Sowell, Lifeworks and the SSG acquisition. However, top-customer schedules, revenue concentration, churn, retention, supplier spend and severed relationships are not public.

III.A Top customers by application

partially verified confidence: medium

Aggregate advisor counts are public, but the top 15 customers by application, product ownership and timing of purchases are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Top 15 customers/firms by revenue/AUC/application for past two fiscal years and YTD.
  • Active advisor definitions, account-level usage and cohort retention.

Hidden risks

  • Customer concentration could be hidden beneath aggregate advisor numbers.
  • SSG-acquired customers may have different retention/economics than organically acquired advisors.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide top-customer schedule by application, advisor count, AUC, revenue and purchase/onboarding timing.
  • Define advisor, active advisor, funded account and firm metrics used in public claims.
Public advisor and adoption scale claims
metric or signaldate or contextvaluesource qualitydiligence caveat
Advisor countSeries F release, 2025-04-22Over 4,700 advisorsPress-release claimDefinition of advisor, active status and paid relationship unknown.
Advisor countHomepage accessed 2026-05-216,000+ advisorsCompany homepage claimNeeds monthly cohort reconciliation and churn/activation definitions.
AUM growthSeries F releaseTripled AUM for two consecutive yearsPress-release claimAUM/AUC methodology, net flows and account concentration not public.
Survey recognitionT3 survey cited in Series F releaseShare rose from 2.85% to 6.25%Press-release citation of surveyNeed underlying survey base, categories, time periods and independent copy.

Advisor count is not equivalent to revenue, active accounts or profitable relationships.

Public advisor scale claims over time Line chart of publicly cited advisor-count claims.

The second x-value uses report accessed date because the homepage claim was not separately dated.

III.B Strategic relationships

partially verified confidence: medium

Public relationship evidence includes SSG, Sowell and Lifeworks. Relationship existence is supported, but revenue contribution, marketing agreements and expansion economics are private.

Evidence gaps

  • Relationship contracts, revenue contribution, marketing agreements, renewal terms and customer reference checks.

Hidden risks

  • Acquired or enterprise relationships may require service-level commitments or pricing concessions.
  • Customer-quoted ROI could be non-representative.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide all strategic partnership/customer contracts and permission for reference calls with Sowell, Lifeworks and migrated SSG advisors.
Named strategic relationships and customer references
relationshippublic signalpotential valueopen diligence questions
Shareholders Service Group acquisitionBrokerage/custodial platform for RIAs with >20 years and thousands of advisors.Scale, legacy advisor base, custody operations and migration opportunity.Purchase terms, attrition, migration issues, retained assets and integration costs.
Sowell ManagementAdded Altruist as enterprise custodial partner.Enterprise RIA/custodial validation.Contract economics, onboarding status, asset migration and satisfaction.
Lifeworks Advisors$900M firm, >2,000 households, selected Altruist as custodial partner.Named customer reference and automation ROI narrative.Actual revenue/AUC contribution, reference call, retention obligations and ROI methodology.

Public customer pages are useful starting points for direct reference calls.

III.C Revenue by customer

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No public revenue-by-customer schedule or >5% customer concentration data was found. Aggregate advisor/AUM metrics must be reconciled to revenue, AUC and gross margin.

Evidence gaps

  • Customer revenue/AUC concentration, NRR/churn, gross margin by customer cohort and customer-level profitability.

Hidden risks

  • A small number of enterprise RIAs, acquired relationships or custody/sweep balances could drive disproportionate economics.
  • Revenue may lag advisor counts if accounts are unfunded or free/discounted.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide revenue by customer/firm, any >5% customers, AUC/account balances, gross margin and NRR/churn cohorts.

III.D Significant relationships severed within the last two years

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No reliable public schedule of severed customer, partner or supplier relationships was found.

Evidence gaps

  • Lost customer/partner/supplier schedule with reasons, revenue/AUC impact and remedial actions.

Hidden risks

  • Failed migrations, lost enterprise RIAs, terminated data vendors or bank/sweep relationships could materially affect growth and reputation.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide schedule of significant relationships severed, downgraded or under dispute in the last two years.

III.E Top suppliers

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Top supplier names, spend and agreements are not public. Likely critical categories include cloud, AI model providers, market-data/integration vendors, sweep banks and regulatory/compliance service providers.

Evidence gaps

  • Top supplier spend for past two fiscal years and current YTD; AI/cloud/bank/data vendor agreements.

Hidden risks

  • Vendor concentration, unfavorable termination rights, AI/cloud cost spikes or bank-program constraints could pressure margins and operations.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide top-supplier schedule, material vendor contracts, subprocessor list and sweep-bank program agreements.
Customer, revenue and supplier concentration gap map
checklist areapublic statusrisk createdrequested artifact
Top 15 customers by applicationNo public top-15 list; only selected named relationships and aggregate advisor claims.Concentration, churn and product-fit risk cannot be assessed.Top customer list by revenue/AUC/application for past two fiscal years and current YTD.
Revenue by customer, >5% customersNo customer revenue schedule found.Potential enterprise/customer concentration hidden by advisor-count metric.Revenue by customer/firm, AUC, funded accounts, gross margin and NRR.
Severed relationshipsNo reliable public severed-customer/supplier schedule found.Lost enterprise relationships or failed migrations could be invisible.Lost customers, terminated partnerships, reasons, churn cohorts and complaint log.
Top suppliersNo top-supplier purchase amounts or agreements found; AI, cloud, market-data and sweep-bank suppliers are likely critical categories.Vendor concentration, margin and compliance dependencies unknown.Supplier spend by vendor, cloud/AI contracts, sweep-bank agreements, data vendors and termination rights.

This table is gap-focused because the requested schedules are not public.

Chapter 04

04Competition

Altruist’s integrated RIA custody/software positioning is differentiated publicly, but the market includes scaled custodians and advisor-technology incumbents. Competitive strength must be validated through win/loss, buyer interviews and segment-level market-share data.

IV.A Competitive landscape by market segment

partially verified confidence: medium

Public competitor pages show Altruist faces custody/advisor-services incumbents and advisor-software platforms. Altruist competes on integration, price, technology, service and regulated custody trust.

Evidence gaps

  • Market share by RIA segment, win/loss data, churn by competitor, migration costs and independent customer interviews.

Hidden risks

  • Incumbents can match pricing, bundle services or exploit advisor trust and switching costs.
  • Software incumbents can deepen integrations and neutralize product-feature gaps.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide competitive win/loss reports, migration analysis, price benchmarking and third-party market-share data by RIA segment.
Competitive landscape by segment
segmentrepresentative competitorscompetitor public positioningaltruist implication
Custody / advisor servicesCharles Schwab Advisor Services; Fidelity Institutional; BNY PershingRIA/advisor solutions, wealth-management firms and advisor infrastructure.Altruist must overcome incumbent trust, breadth, balance sheet and advisor switching costs.
Advisor technology / portfolio managementOrion; Envestnet TamaracWealthTech and wealth-management platform for advisors/RIAs.Software incumbents compete on workflow depth, integrations and installed base.
Digital-advice / model marketplacesBetterment Advisor SolutionsPortfolio construction and model marketplace for advisors.Altruist’s integrated custody-plus-software must differentiate against narrower or adjacent platforms.

Competitor-owned pages validate market presence, not market share.

Basis-of-competition scorecard
basisaltruist public signalcompetitive counterpressureproof needed
Price / total costNo platform fees and low external-account fees.Incumbents can bundle, discount or subsidize with scale.Net price comparisons, hidden charges, margin by cohort and win/loss economics.
Technology integrationIntegrated account opening, trading, billing, reporting and 25+ integrations.Advisor software suites and custodians have deep installed bases.Usage depth, integration uptime, NPS, implementation time and migration outcomes.
Regulatory trust and custody safetyRegistered entities, SIPC disclosures and SOC/pentest claims.Large incumbents have long operating records and brand trust.Regulatory record, exam history, control testing, insurance and customer reference checks.
AI/product innovationHazel AI and automation claims.AI features can be copied; privacy/regulatory risk may slow adoption.Differentiated data access, accuracy, liability controls, retention and willingness-to-pay.

Scores are not assigned because independent buyer interviews were not performed.

RIA/advisor infrastructure competitive map Map Altruist and selected public competitors by integrated custody orientation and advisor-software breadth.

Coordinates are analyst judgments based on public positioning, not measured market share.

Chapter 05

05Marketing, Sales, and Distribution

Altruist has a focused independent-advisor/RIA GTM story, public growth/awareness signals and named enterprise references. Sales productivity, pipeline conversion, CAC/payback, quotas, marketing budget and geographic/channel mix are not public.

V.A Strategy and implementation

partially verified confidence: medium

Public positioning targets independent advisors/growth-oriented RIAs and emphasizes integrated workflow, pricing and product innovation. Public GTM evidence includes financing releases, product updates, customer announcements and T3 survey recognition.

Evidence gaps

  • Marketing calendar, spend, CAC/payback, channel mix, campaign attribution, compliance review process and T3 survey source data.

Hidden risks

  • Marketing claims may outrun compliance controls in regulated products.
  • Awareness metrics may not translate to pipeline conversion or profitable accounts.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide GTM plan, campaign performance, compliance approval workflow and source data for survey/recognition claims.
Public GTM and distribution signals
signalpublic evidencereadthroughdiligence needed
Clear target buyerHomepage targets independent advisors; Series F targets growth-oriented RIAs.Focused ICP can improve messaging and product fit.Segment-level pipeline, buyer personas and retention by advisor size.
Industry recognitionT3 survey share cited as rising from 2.85% to 6.25%; all-star in multiple categories.Marketing/awareness signal among advisor-tech buyers.Underlying survey, category definitions and correlation to pipeline/win rates.
Acquisition-led distributionSSG acquisition brought a platform used by thousands of advisors.Potential installed-base expansion and migration channel.Retention, migration, revenue and integration KPIs.
Named enterprise referencesSowell and Lifeworks announcements.Proof points for enterprise custody and automation stories.Contract terms, references and expansion pipeline.

Public GTM evidence is directional and should be tested against CRM data.

T3 survey-share signal cited in Series F release Bar chart of T3 survey share increase cited by Altruist’s Series F release.

Survey percentages are cited from the release and were not independently recomputed.

V.B Major Customers

partially verified confidence: medium

Named public customer/partner announcements suggest enterprise traction, but status/trends, future growth and pipeline are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Pipeline by stage, committed AUC/revenue, customer health, renewal/expansion status and reference feedback.

Hidden risks

  • Customer announcements may precede full asset migration or material revenue.
  • Pipeline could be concentrated in a few enterprise transitions.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide major-customer health and pipeline report, including implementation status and expected asset/revenue ramp.

V.C Principal avenues for generating new business

partially verified confidence: medium

Public evidence suggests new business may come from direct RIA marketing, enterprise custody relationships, product-led pricing, acquired SSG advisors and industry recognition, but channel contribution is not public.

Evidence gaps

  • New bookings by channel, source attribution, SSG migration conversion and partner economics.

Hidden risks

  • Acquisition-led growth may produce lower-quality or lower-retention customers than organic growth.
  • Partner/channel economics could dilute margins.

Follow-up questions

  • Break out new customers/bookings/AUC by direct, partner, SSG/acquisition, referral and product-led channels.

V.D Sales force productivity model

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Sales compensation, quotas, sales cycle, ramp and hiring plan are not publicly disclosed.

Evidence gaps

  • Sales headcount, quota, attainment, ramp, compensation, sales-cycle length, pipeline conversion and CAC/payback.

Hidden risks

  • Rapid growth may require heavy sales/support headcount, long implementation cycles or expensive enterprise onboarding.
  • Quota/ramp assumptions may be aggressive after large funding rounds.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide sales productivity model, CRM export, quota attainment, sales-cycle history and planned sales hires.
Sales productivity and budget evidence gaps
sales model itempublic evidencestatusrequested data
Sales compensation and quotaNo public sales compensation or quota model found.Not publicQuota by role, compensation plans, attainment distribution and ramp time.
Sales cycle and pipelinePublic customer announcements identify wins but not pipeline conversion or cycle time.Not publicCRM funnel, stage conversion, win/loss, cycle length and partner-channel contribution.
Marketing budget sufficiencyLarge financing rounds imply growth capacity but no marketing budget or CAC/payback is public.Not publicMarketing plan, CAC by channel, payback, sales capacity, hiring plan and budget-to-actuals.
Domestic/international distributionPublic evidence focuses U.S. RIA/advisor market; no material foreign-operations evidence found.PartialGeographic revenue, licensing footprint, international plans and regulatory requirements.

Sales productivity is one of the largest public-data gaps.

V.E Ability to implement marketing plan with current and projected budgets

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Large late-stage financing suggests resources for growth, but marketing budget, headcount plan, compliance review capacity and ROI are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Budget-to-actuals, marketing plan, compliance review staffing, CAC/payback and hiring plan.

Hidden risks

  • Budget may be consumed by compliance, support, engineering or integration rather than efficient customer acquisition.
  • Marketing in regulated financial services requires review controls that can slow execution.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide current and projected GTM budget with CAC/payback, compliance review capacity and sensitivity to slower advisor migration.
Chapter 06

06Research and Development

Altruist’s R&D narrative centers on integrated custody/software workflows, Hazel AI and leadership investment. Public evidence is promising but technical architecture, engineering allocation, roadmap cost, model-risk controls and reliability metrics are private.

VI.A Description of R&D organization

partially verified confidence: medium

Public sources identify product/R&D focus areas and a CTO appointment, but the engineering organization, budget, staffing by function and development process are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Engineering org chart, roadmap, R&D budget, sprint/velocity metrics, incident history, technical debt and build-vs-buy decisions.

Hidden risks

  • Engineering hiring may lag product ambition; regulated custody and AI require specialized controls.
  • Technical debt from acquisition integration could slow roadmap execution.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide R&D org chart, roadmap, budget, major engineering initiatives, security ownership and technical-debt register.
R&D and product-launch evidence
rd signalpublic evidencestrategic valueprivate validation needed
Integrated custody and software platformAccount opening, trading, portfolio management, billing and reporting in one place.Potential workflow consolidation and switching-cost creation.Architecture diagrams, roadmap, uptime, engineering velocity and product analytics.
Hazel AI launch/expansionHazel pages describe advisor AI workflows and savings claims.Potential differentiation and advisor productivity gains.Model evaluations, hallucination/error rates, adoption cohorts, vendor costs and compliance review.
Senior technical leadershipSumanth Sukumar joined as CTO with Coinbase/Uber/Facebook background.May improve execution capability for scaling custody and AI platform.Org chart, engineering hiring plan, attrition, technical debt and security roadmap.

R&D costs and engineering allocation are not public.

VI.B New Product Pipeline

partially verified confidence: medium

Public product pipeline signals include Hazel AI and ongoing platform/pricing enhancements. Timing, cost of development, critical technology, adoption and new-product risk require private validation.

Evidence gaps

  • Product roadmap, release gates, AI accuracy/evaluation data, vendor contracts, development cost and customer adoption cohorts.

Hidden risks

  • AI outputs could be inaccurate, non-compliant or privacy-invasive.
  • Usage-based AI/vendor costs could pressure margins if pricing does not track usage.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide Hazel roadmap, AI evaluations, model/vendor contracts, data-retention evidence, release risk assessments and product-level economics.
AI/data product risk-control matrix
technology dependencypublic claimfailure modetest or artifact
AI model providersZero data retention with core AI model providers; no model training on customer data.Vendor retention/training breach, data leakage, contractual non-compliance.Vendor contracts, DPAs, subprocessor list, logs and architecture evidence.
Advisor/client data ingestionHazel analyzes tax forms, paystubs, statements, notes, emails, custodial and CRM data.Incorrect ingestion, stale data, privacy breach or unsuitable output.Data lineage, permission model, QA harness, incident logs and opt-out controls.
Custody/trading platform reliabilitySOC 2 Type 2 and annual third-party penetration testing.Outage, security vulnerability, account/trade error, regulatory breach.SOC report, uptime/SLOs, DR tests, pentest findings and vulnerability remediation SLA.

New-product benefits should be weighted against compliance and model-risk burden.

Public R&D and product-pipeline timeline Timeline of public product/R&D signals: integrated platform, SSG, AI/security claims and senior technical leadership.

Hazel point uses accessed date because precise product launch date was not verified.

Chapter 07

07Management and Personnel

Public evidence verifies founder/CEO Jason Wenk, senior 2025 executive hires and an ADV employee-count anchor for Altruist LLC, plus public benefits positioning. Full org chart, headcount plan, compensation, turnover, employee relations and incentive-stock plan details are private.

VII.A Organization Chart

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

A complete public organization chart was not found. Public roles can be mapped at a high level, but actual reporting lines, board structure and regulated-entity control functions require company disclosure.

Evidence gaps

  • Full org chart, board composition, regulated-entity governance, compliance/security reporting lines and succession plan.

Hidden risks

  • Control functions may be understaffed relative to regulated custody and AI/data obligations.
  • Founder dependency or unclear regulated-entity governance could create execution risk.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide current and projected org chart, board/committee structure and control-function staffing model.
Public management and control org view Publicly visible leadership/control roles relevant to execution and regulated operations.

Reporting lines are diligence placeholders based on public roles; request actual org chart.

VII.B Historical and projected headcount by function and location

partially verified confidence: medium

ADV reports approximately 348 employees for the adviser entity, but historical/projected consolidated headcount by function and location is not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Historical and projected headcount by function/location, recruiting plan, open roles, attrition and facilities commitments.

Hidden risks

  • Headcount may be concentrated in expensive engineering/compliance/support functions.
  • Hiring plans may exceed budget or lag regulatory/product needs.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide monthly headcount by function/location for two years, planned hires and budgeted personnel cost.
Personnel, headcount and compensation public evidence
areapublic evidencestatusprivate request
HeadcountADV reports approximately 348 employees for Altruist LLC adviser entity.Official adviser-entity anchor onlyConsolidated headcount by function/location, historical and projected for two years.
Compensation/benefitsCareers page advertises competitive compensation, equity for all team members and health/dental/vision day one.Public benefits positioningCompensation bands, employment agreements, bonus plans, equity pool and benefits cost.
Locations / work modelCareers page references collaboration in one of three offices; homepage/legal evidence includes Culver City and Dallas entity records.PartialEmployee distribution by office/remote status and facilities obligations.
Turnover / employee relationsNo public turnover or employee-relations schedule found.Not publicVoluntary/involuntary turnover, regretted attrition, complaints, litigation, engagement survey and retention plan.

ADV employee count should not be treated as total consolidated company headcount without confirmation.

VII.C Senior management biographies

partially verified confidence: medium

Public materials identify Jason Wenk and 2025 CTO/CBO hires with relevant technology and business backgrounds. Ages, tenure details, references and complete executive roster are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Full executive biographies, references, tenure, employment terms, separation history and succession plans.

Hidden risks

  • Recent executive hires may not yet be integrated or retained.
  • Founder dependency may be material.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide executive bios, employment agreements, reference access and retention/succession plans.
Public senior leadership roster
personpublic rolepublic background signaldiligence questions
Jason WenkFounder / CEOFounder-authored Series E note and company narrative.Founder dependency, board governance, succession, references and ownership.
Sumanth SukumarChief Technology OfficerFormer Coinbase/Uber/Facebook engineering leader per BusinessWire release.Scope, engineering org health, security accountability, retention terms and references.
Rich RaoChief Business OfficerFormer Google/Meta/Intuit executive per BusinessWire release.GTM ownership, sales productivity targets, enterprise pipeline and retention terms.

This roster includes only public names surfaced during standard research; request full management/org chart.

VII.D Compensation arrangements

partially verified confidence: medium

Careers page discloses broad compensation/benefit positioning but not key employment agreements, bonus plans, salary bands or benefit costs.

Evidence gaps

  • Employment agreements, compensation bands, bonus plans, severance/change-of-control terms and benefits cost.

Hidden risks

  • Late-stage hiring and equity refresh needs may pressure cash burn and dilution.
  • Executive agreements may include change-of-control or severance obligations.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide key employment agreements, compensation philosophy, salary/bonus/equity bands and benefit-cost schedule.

VII.E Incentive stock plans

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Careers page states equity for all team members, but the incentive stock plan, option pool, refresh grants, vesting and dilution are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Stock plan, option pool, vesting schedules, grants by employee, exercise prices and refresh policy.

Hidden risks

  • Insufficient option pool or retention refresh grants could require dilution after investment.
  • Underwater options may affect retention.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide equity incentive plan, grant schedule, option pool, vesting and refresh requirements.

VII.F Significant employee relations problems, past or present

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No public schedule of employee-relations issues was found in standard research.

Evidence gaps

  • Employee-relations claims, HR investigations, whistleblower complaints, workplace litigation and settlement history.

Hidden risks

  • Unreported employee disputes, compliance whistleblower complaints or culture issues could affect regulated operations and retention.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide employee-relations/litigation schedule, HR complaint log and whistleblower/compliance escalation summary.

VII.G Personnel Turnover

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Turnover data for the last two years and retention-related benefits data are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Voluntary/involuntary turnover, regretted attrition, offer acceptance, retention programs and engagement surveys.

Hidden risks

  • High turnover in engineering, compliance, operations or customer support could impair product quality and regulatory controls.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide turnover by function/location, regretted attrition, hiring funnel and retention plan for the last two years.
Chapter 08

08Legal and Related Matters

Altruist’s legal/regulatory profile is central to diligence because it operates broker-dealer, adviser, custody, data and AI workflows. Official records verify regulated entities; public sources also show a regulatory event/fine report, trademark suit and broad privacy/data obligations.

VIII.A Pending lawsuits against the Company

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No public schedule of lawsuits against Altruist was established in standard research. This is not a clean legal opinion; company counsel must provide a complete litigation schedule.

Evidence gaps

  • Counsel-prepared litigation schedule and docket searches across relevant jurisdictions/arbitration forums.

Hidden risks

  • Private arbitration, customer complaints, employment claims or sealed/non-indexed disputes may not be visible.
  • Regulated financial-services disputes may sit in arbitration or regulatory processes rather than court dockets.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide litigation, arbitration, demand-letter and threatened-claim schedule with counsel assessment and reserves.

VIII.B Pending lawsuits initiated by Company

partially verified confidence: medium

Bloomberg Law reported Altruist Corp initiated a trademark suit in W.D. Michigan over continued use of the Altruist mark after a settlement.

Evidence gaps

  • Docket, pleadings, settlement agreement, current status, claimed damages/remedies and legal budget.

Hidden risks

  • Settlement enforcement may distract management or create uncertain legal expenses.
  • Trademark confusion risk could affect financial-services brand trust.

Follow-up questions

  • Pull and review W.D. Mich. docket 1:24-cv-00753 and request counsel status memo.
Public legal and regulatory chronology Chronology of public legal/regulatory markers requiring legal diligence.

Order reflects event dates where known; publication date and filing date may differ from conduct date.

VIII.C Environmental and employee safety issues and liabilities

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

No public material environmental or employee-safety issue was found. Given Altruist’s software/financial-services profile, risk appears lower but still requires lease, insurance and employee-claims review.

Evidence gaps

  • Facilities leases, OSHA/workplace claims, workers compensation/loss runs and employee-relations schedule.

Hidden risks

  • Office leases, workplace claims or employee safety incidents could be non-public.
  • New workplace or data/security regulations could impose compliance costs.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide facilities, insurance loss runs and workplace-safety/employee-claims schedule.
Privacy, contracts and material exposure matrix
exposure areapublic evidencewhy materialprivate request
Sensitive personal/financial dataPrivacy policy lists SSN/TIN, DOB, assets, income, account balances/activity and bank/account data.High-value data increases breach, privacy and regulatory exposure.Data inventory, retention/deletion policy, incidents, insurance, vendor list and privacy impact assessments.
AI processing of communications and recordingsPrivacy policy and Hazel pages reference message content, metadata, meeting recordings and tax/CRM/custodial inputs.AI features can create confidentiality, suitability, retention and discoverability risk.AI governance policy, user consents, model logs, vendor DPAs, evaluation results and opt-out process.
Material customer/supplier contractsNamed customer pages and SSG acquisition are public; terms and supplier agreements are not.Contract concentration, termination rights and vendor costs drive risk and value.Material contracts, top suppliers, enterprise customer agreements, acquisition agreement and change-of-control terms.
Environmental/employee safetyNo public material environmental or employee-safety liability found in standard research.Likely lower for software/financial-services office footprint, but not cleared.Facilities leases, workplace safety claims, insurance loss runs and employee-relations/legal schedule.

No material-contract schedule was public.

VIII.D Material patents, copyrights, licenses, and trademarks

partially verified confidence: medium

The public trademark suit indicates brand/IP enforcement activity, but a complete IP portfolio, open-source obligations, software licenses and third-party data/AI licenses are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • IP portfolio, registered marks, patents, copyrights, open-source SBOM, software/data/AI licenses and infringement claims.

Hidden risks

  • Open-source, data, AI model, market-data or integration licenses may impose restrictions or costs.
  • Brand dispute could require monitoring or settlement obligations.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide IP schedule, trademark docket, open-source policy/SBOM and all material software/data/AI licenses.

VIII.E Insurance coverage and material exposures

partially verified confidence: medium

SIPC coverage and Altruist security-page protection claims are public, but actual insurance policies, excess coverage, E&O/cyber coverage and exclusions are not public.

Evidence gaps

  • Insurance policies, excess SIPC details, E&O/cyber/fidelity bond coverage, exclusions, loss runs and coverage opinions.

Hidden risks

  • Coverage gaps or exclusions could leave losses from cyber, operational errors, securities lending or AI advice workflows.
  • Advisor/client misunderstanding of protections could create complaints or reputational harm.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide all insurance policies, excess coverage terms, loss runs and customer-facing protection disclosures.
Registrations, protections and coverage caveats
topicpublic evidencecoverage or statusdiligence caveat
Broker-dealer registrationAltruist Financial LLC CRD 299274 / SEC 8-70244; FINRA Dallas district.Official FINRA record.Review registrations, states, exam history, net capital and disclosure details.
Investment adviser registrationAltruist LLC CRD 299398; SEC ADV annual amendment filed 2026-03-24.Official SEC/IAPD record.Review Form ADV Part 2, client types, assets, conflicts and compliance history.
SIPC protectionSIPC investor guidance: up to $500,000 including $250,000 cash for customer cash/securities at financially troubled member.Statutory investor protection with limits.Not investment-loss insurance; confirm excess policy terms and client communications.
FDIC sweep / excess coverage / SOC 2Altruist security page references FDIC-insured bank deposit sweep, SIPC/excess and SOC 2 Type 2.Company disclosure.Obtain program bank list, excess-insurance policy, SOC report and exceptions.

Use careful language: protections have limits and do not eliminate operating or market risk.

VIII.F Material contracts

not publicly verifiable confidence: low

Material customer, supplier, AI, data, sweep-bank, acquisition and enterprise custody contracts are not public, but public privacy/Hazel/customer evidence shows these contracts are material to risk.

Evidence gaps

  • Material customer/supplier contracts, AI/vendor DPAs, sweep-bank agreements, data licenses, acquisition agreement and change-of-control provisions.

Hidden risks

  • Termination rights, exclusivity, minimums, indemnities, data restrictions or change-of-control clauses could impair value.
  • AI/cloud/vendor costs may scale unexpectedly.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide material-contract schedule with revenue/spend, term, termination, exclusivity, indemnity and change-of-control terms.

VIII.G Regulatory agency problems

partially verified confidence: medium

Official FINRA/SEC records verify regulated entities and at least one BrokerCheck disclosure event; an independent report describes a FINRA fine/restitution matter involving fully paid securities lending supervision and communications.

Evidence gaps

  • FINRA AWC, exam letters, remediation evidence, compliance staffing, surveillance reports, complaints and regulatory correspondence.

Hidden risks

  • Regulatory remediation may require systems, staffing or customer communication changes.
  • Future exams may focus on securities lending, marketing, AI/data controls and custody operations.

Follow-up questions

  • Provide all regulatory correspondence, FINRA/SEC exam findings, AWCs, remediation plans, complaints and compliance testing results for the last five years.
Regulatory and legal matter register
matterpublic statuspotential exposurenext step
FINRA disclosure event / reported securities-lending supervision matterBrokerCheck flags one regulatory event; FX News reports $150,000 fine and $142,851.22 restitution plus interest.Compliance remediation, customer restitution, communications controls, exam scrutiny and reputational impact.Retrieve FINRA AWC, board reporting, remediation evidence and customer notices.
Trademark enforcement suitBloomberg Law reported Altruist Corp sued a similarly named financial-services company in W.D. Mich. docket 1:24-cv-00753.Legal expense, settlement enforcement and brand-confusion management.Pull docket, pleadings, settlement agreement and current status.
Pending lawsuits against AltruistNo public lawsuit-against-company schedule found in standard research beyond regulatory/trademark sources.Unknown; absence of public evidence is not clearance.Request counsel litigation schedule and run docket searches in all relevant jurisdictions.

Primary legal documents should supersede news summaries.

Legal, regulatory and control risk heatmap Heatmap of key diligence risks concentrated in regulated custody, AI/data, financial opacity and competition.

Heatmap is an analyst prioritization based on public evidence, not a quantified loss model.

Evidence

Evidence claims
IDClaimStatusSources
EC-001 CB Insights lists Altruist as a U.S. financial-services unicorn valued at $1.9B with an April 16, 2024 date. verified medium SRC-001
EC-002 Altruist announced a $152M Series F led by GIC at an approximately $1.9B valuation. partially verified medium SRC-003SRC-004
EC-003 Altruist publicly announced a $169M Series E and described itself as a modern custodian built exclusively for RIAs. partially verified medium SRC-005
EC-004 Altruist positions itself as an integrated wealth platform for independent advisors with 6,000+ advisors and 25+ integrations. partially verified medium SRC-002
EC-005 The Series F release claims over 4,700 advisors, two consecutive years of tripled AUM and T3 survey share rising from 2.85% to 6.25%. partially verified medium SRC-003SRC-004
EC-006 Public product pages state no platform/PAS fees for Altruist accounts and a $1 monthly fee for connected non-Altruist accounts above the first 100. partially verified medium SRC-013SRC-014
EC-007 Altruist discloses regulated broker-dealer/RIA entities, SIPC/FDIC-sweep protections, SOC 2 Type 2 and recurring third-party penetration testing. partially verified medium SRC-006
EC-008 FINRA BrokerCheck identifies Altruist Financial LLC as CRD 299274 / SEC 8-70244 and shows one regulatory disclosure event. verified high SRC-008
EC-009 SEC IAPD/ADV identifies Altruist LLC as an SEC-registered adviser with CRD 299398, an annual amendment filed March 24, 2026, about 348 employees, and Altruist Financial LLC as a related broker-dealer. verified high SRC-009
EC-010 Altruist lists public broker-dealer financial condition statements for 2022 through 2025 periods. verified medium SRC-010
EC-011 SIPC protection is limited to customer cash/securities at a financially troubled SIPC member and is not protection against investment losses. verified high SRC-011
EC-012 Altruist acquired Shareholders Service Group, an RIA brokerage/custodial platform with more than 20 years of operating history and thousands of advisors. partially verified medium SRC-012
EC-013 Public customer/partner pages identify Sowell and Lifeworks as custodial partners and cite Lifeworks’ $900M size, 2,000+ households and claimed $1,800 annual manual-effort savings per client. partially verified medium SRC-015SRC-016
EC-014 Hazel AI public pages claim advisors save an average of 20 hours per month and $5,900 in client taxes, while security pages state no model training on customer data and zero data retention with core AI model providers. partially verified low SRC-017SRC-018
EC-015 Altruist announced senior leadership additions: Sumanth Sukumar as CTO and Rich Rao as Chief Business Officer. partially verified medium SRC-019SRC-020
EC-016 Altruist careers materials advertise competitive compensation, equity for all team members, health benefits from day one and collaboration from three offices. partially verified medium SRC-021
EC-017 Altruist competes against large custodians and advisor-technology platforms including Schwab, Fidelity, BNY Pershing/Wove, Orion, Envestnet Tamarac and Betterment Advisor Solutions. verified medium SRC-024SRC-025SRC-026SRC-027SRC-028SRC-029
EC-018 An independent trade-news report says FINRA fined Altruist Financial $150,000 and required $142,851.22 restitution plus interest for alleged fully paid securities-lending supervision and communication violations from March 2020 to April 2023. partially verified medium SRC-022
EC-019 Bloomberg Law reported that Altruist Corp sued to block a similarly named financial-services company’s continued trademark use after a settlement. partially verified medium SRC-023
EC-020 Altruist privacy disclosures cover sensitive adviser/client data collection and Hazel AI processing of messages, metadata and recordings. verified medium SRC-007
EC-021 Public records do not disclose Altruist’s consolidated audited P&L, balance sheet, cash burn, ARR, gross margin, retention or customer concentration. not publicly verifiable medium SRC-001SRC-002SRC-003SRC-010SRC-009
EC-022 Altruist’s public customer traction is credible enough to justify deeper diligence but insufficient to underwrite revenue quality or concentration. partially verified medium SRC-002SRC-003SRC-012SRC-015SRC-016
Sources
IDPublisherTitleAccessed
SRC-001 CB Insights The Complete List Of Unicorn Companies 2026-05-21
SRC-002 Altruist Altruist homepage 2026-05-21
SRC-003 GIC Altruist Raises $152M Series F Led by GIC to Accelerate Innovation for Growth-Oriented RIAs 2026-05-21
SRC-004 BusinessWire Altruist Raises $152M Series F Led by GIC to Accelerate Innovation for Growth-Oriented RIAs 2026-05-21
SRC-005 Altruist A note from Jason Wenk regarding Altruist’s $169M Series E raise 2026-05-21
SRC-006 Altruist Security and protection disclosures 2026-05-21
SRC-007 Altruist Privacy Policy 2026-05-21
SRC-008 FINRA BrokerCheck FINRA BrokerCheck Firm Summary: Altruist Financial LLC CRD 299274 2026-05-21
SRC-009 SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure: Altruist LLC CRD 299398 / ADV PDF 2026-05-21
SRC-010 Altruist Financial condition statements 2026-05-21
SRC-011 Securities Investor Protection Corporation What SIPC Protects 2026-05-21
SRC-012 Altruist Altruist acquires Shareholders Service Group 2026-05-21
SRC-013 Altruist Eliminating portfolio accounting software fees 2026-05-21
SRC-014 Altruist April 2024 product update 2026-05-21
SRC-015 Altruist Sowell Management adds Altruist as enterprise custodial partner 2026-05-21
SRC-016 Altruist Altruist named custodial partner for $900M Lifeworks Advisors 2026-05-21
SRC-017 Hazel AI Hazel AI homepage 2026-05-21
SRC-018 Hazel AI Hazel AI security 2026-05-21
SRC-019 BusinessWire Former Coinbase and Uber Executive Joins Altruist as CTO to Cement Tech Advantage 2026-05-21
SRC-020 BusinessWire Altruist Expands Leadership Team with New Chief Business Officer to Drive Growth and Industry Presence 2026-05-21
SRC-021 Altruist Careers at Altruist 2026-05-21
SRC-022 FX News Group FINRA fines Altruist Financial for alleged rule violations 2026-05-21
SRC-023 Bloomberg Law Firm’s Use of Altruist Trademark After Settlement Draws Suit 2026-05-21
SRC-024 Charles Schwab Schwab Advisor Services 2026-05-21
SRC-025 Fidelity Institutional Fidelity Institutional 2026-05-21
SRC-026 BNY Pershing Wove by BNY Pershing 2026-05-21
SRC-027 Orion Orion WealthTech for Advisors 2026-05-21
SRC-028 Envestnet Envestnet Tamarac 2026-05-21
SRC-029 Betterment Betterment Advisor Solutions 2026-05-21

Disclaimer

This report is a public-evidence diligence snapshot, not investment advice. Important financial, legal, technical, and contractual facts remain non-public and should be verified directly with management and primary documents before any investment decision.